Kravchenko, S.

English

Electronic Eastern European National University Institutional Repository

557 
 
 
потребують зміни культури підприємства, що стримує підвищення її 
ефективності, а згодом – підвищення ефективності діяльності підприємства. 
Культурні аспекти є важливим засобом, за допомогою якого організації 
можуть забезпечити собі стабільність і процвітання навіть в період кризи, 
залишаючись ще конкурентоспроможними.[7] 
Висновки та пропозиції. Отже, корпоративна культура є важливим 
чинником формування стабільної роботи персоналу та самої організації. Тому 
культура підприємства повинна формуватися в тісному зв’язку з цілями 
організації. Проблеми та питання культури організації повинні вирішуватися як 
одні із самих важливих. Бо корпоративна культура - це чинник від якого залежить 
ефективність діяльності організації. 
Використана література: 
1. https://xreferat.com/60/7369-1-korporativna-kul-tura.html 
2. Балабанова Л.В., Сардак О.В. Управління персоналом - Підручник. - К.: Центр 
учбової літератури, 2011. - 468 с. 
3. Ігнатьєва І.А., Гарафонова О.І. Корпоративне управління - Підручник - К.: Центр 
учбової літератури, 2013. — 600 с. 
4. Петрик В.І. Корпоративна культура та її роль в розвитку організації - 2018 
5. Тарасова О.В., Марінова С.С. Корпоративна культура як інструмент ефективного 
менеджменту підприємства - 2013 - №3(19)  
6. Фіщук Н.Ю., Ломачевська І.В. Корпоративна культура організації: сутність, види, 
принципи та вплив на розвиток організації. - 2012 - №1(56) - Том 4 
7. Чайка Г.Л. Культура ділового спілкування менеджера - Навчальний посібник / К.: 
Знання, 2005. - 442 c. 
8. Чернишова А.О., Немченко Т.А. Деякі аспекти корпоративної культури 
організації - Наукові праці КНТУ. Економічні науки. - 2010. - вип. 17. 
 
Kravchenko S., the professor 
The Kiev co-operative institute  
of business and the right,  
the city of Kiev, Ukraine 
 
FORMATION OF CULTURE OF ECONOMIC SAFETY AT CORPORATE 
LEVEL 
For maintenance of economic safety at corporate level creation of base conditions 
of its realisation is necessary. The following concerns that: development and 
distribution of innovative technologies as factor of maintenance of competitiveness of 
the economy promoting stability and absence of critical dependence of home market 
from import; creation of the institutional environment with the parametres, allowing to 
raise efficiency and to minimise risks of economic development; working out and 
constant perfection of ways and tools of management of increase of economic efficiency 
of activity of managing subjects on a basis transparenten; formation of mechanisms of 
minimisation of the risks connected with unfair behaviour of managing subjects - 
participants of transactions [1]. 
Last two conditions are based on a principle of culture of economic safety. This 
principle assumes: a high level of development of corporate values, absence of 
infringements of an internal order, achievement of unity of the private and corporate 
558 
 
 
purposes, maximum transparenten internal processes, mutual support and self-checking. 
Values, norms, representations reflect the methods acquired by the personnel and 
practice of performance of the professional problems and duties taking into account 
questions of economic efficiency and resursesavings. 
The culture of economic safety is a set of the valuable reference points making the 
general vector of development of economic system, directed on maintenance of its 
efficiency and safety by maintenance individual and a joint liability for result, high level 
of mutual trust of all economic subjects, sufficient for maintenance of public control and 
preservation of demanded level of safety transparenten economic processes. Its high 
level provides smoothing of threats and the risks formed owing to the inefficient 
institutional environment [2]. 
In the conditions of reduction of the state intervention in the economy, level of 
economic freedom necessary for increase, value of a private responsibility of citizens, 
their defined ability to self-restriction and self-regulation, and also corporate 
responsibility increases. High level of personal and corporate culture of economic safety 
allows to smooth imperfections of existing is standard-legal base, and also relieves of 
necessity of the maintenance of the scale mechanism of compulsion to performance of 
laws and rules. 
Level of culture of economic safety depends on that: how and how much 
effectively the factors promoting occurrence of threats and risks come to light; problems 
of supervision, audit, monitoring and an estimation of economic processes with a view 
of maintenance both intracorporate economic safety, and safety of counterparts, 
including the state are how much effectively realised; measures on a non-admission or 
minimisation of risk, correction of the revealed defects and deviations and so forth are 
how much in due time taken. 
As the carrier of cultural values is the person formation and development of the 
corporate human capital becomes pledge of efficiency and safety of development of 
economic subjects. Special value is got by the highly skilled experts who have been 
creatively adjusted, ready to the scientific researches, capable to put the received 
knowledge into practice, to broadcast experience to young experts, to fix results of the 
researches in various forms of scientific publications, to receive patents and so forth. 
As an example it is possible to consider algorithm of introduction of culture of 
economic safety at the enterprises of nuclear branch. Safety of operation of objects of 
atomic engineering depends not only on technical parametres, but also from quality of 
bought materials, timely and sufficient financing of productions, building of objects, 
control of target use of the means allocated for innovative development of branch [3].  
Ignoring of economic aspects in system of priorities of safety of operation of 
objects of atomic engineering threatens with an inefficiency of the end result of their 
activity. The considerable resources arriving on maintenance of steady and innovative 
development of the enterprises of atomic engineering from the state, are object of the 
corruption transaction as which initiators can act as insayders, and officials of the state 
and municipal authorities. 
High rates of modernisation and innovative development of domestic atomic 
engineering predetermine growth of volumes of financing, including, budgetary, and, 
559 
 
 
hence, complications of processes of monitoring and control of their target use. 
Problems of maintenance of economic safety of the managing subjects functioning in 
sphere of atomic engineering, deserve special attention as results of their activity not 
only essentially influence rates of economic development of the state, but also put 
public safety in dependence. In these conditions infringement of the established rules 
becomes the extremely dangerous and demands special attention and control and from 
the state (external control), and from the enterprise, its management and hired workers 
(self-checking, self-restriction, internal control). It is necessary to pay for safety, and for 
its absence - to pay off. 
The numerous researches devoted to global problems, connected with failures on 
Chernobyl nuclear electrostations, Three-mail-ajlend, Fukushima, have confirmed it. 
Safety of system is defined it in equal weight in the conditions of organizational three 
unities «things, people and ideas». Integration of these elements occurs within the limits 
of a control system where they take a certain place in its structure and as the subject, 
and object of management, and also the information mediating their interaction moving 
on channels of a straight line and feedback. 
The actions directed on formation and development of culture of economic safety 
should include working out of the is standard-legal base, special procedures, personnel 
development, control procedures and an efficiency estimation. As the project of 
introduction and development of culture of economic safety is the tool of strategic 
planning and contains a complex of actions, the mutual co-ordinated on problems, 
realisation terms, executors and resources and the purposes providing the most effective 
achievement and the decision of problems of economic development of the enterprises, 
it is necessary to spend an estimation of efficiency of its realisation constantly [4]. 
There is a number of indicators with which help it probably to carry out. For a 
basis it is possible it is accepted a technique of an estimation of efficiency of realisation 
of the state and municipal programs containing a complex of indicators. The efficiency 
estimation influences motivation of participants of the project and stimulates them to 
achievement of the planned results. As criteria of efficiency degree of achievement of 
the purposes, performance of actions and quality of results traditionally gets out. 
In the course of research the new scientific category «culture of economic safety», 
as set of the valuable reference points making the general vector of development of 
economic system, directed on maintenance of its efficiency and safety by maintenance 
individual and a joint liability for results of development and functioning of economy, 
high level of mutual trust between subjects of economic relations, sufficient public 
control for maintenance and preservation of demanded level of safety and transparenten 
economic processes is entered. Its value for maintenance of a sustainable development 
of national economy at the expense of smoothing of threats of safety of the institutional 
environment that allows to prove value of an informal ideological element in 
maintenance of efficiency of the measures directed on increase of level of economic 
safety is proved [5]. 
Modern institutional conditions are "unsafe" for business, their complexity and 
"unprofitability" regarding observance of formal rules provoke growth of scales of 
shadow economy that, in turn, forms new stimulus of corruption. Corruption is 
560 
 
 
considered by us not as independent threat of economic safety but as the catalyst of 
threats of economic safety of the institutional environment that allows to reveal among 
factors of preservation of an inefficiency of the institutional environment effect of 
blocking of institutional innovations and dependence on previous development and 
promotes working out of the effective mechanism of counteraction to these destructive 
factors focused on the resolution of conflict between objectivity of economic processes 
and their standard fastening within the limits of the corresponding state policy, the 
economic safety directed on maintenance. 
Thus, it is proved that as a result of complex realisation of the actions directed on 
increase of efficiency of an institutional and corporate business environment, based at 
the generated high level of economic ethics of individuals, achievement of the purpose 
of minimisation of shadow transaction in all forms and display spheres, at all levels of 
economy will be possible. 
The literature: 
1. Bodrunov S., Plotnikov V., Vertakova Y. Technological Development as a Factor of Ensuring 
the National Security // Proceedings of the 30th International Business Information Management 
Association Conference - Vision 2020: Sustainable Economic development, Innovation Management, 
and Global Growth, 8-9 November 2017, Madrid, Spain. рр. 2666-2674. 
2. Choi J.P., Thum М. Corruption And The Shadow Economy, International Economic Review. 
2005. № 46(3). pp. 817-836. 
3. Golovko M.V. Influence of institutional transformations on the choice of mechanisms for 
ensuring economic development and security of nuclear power engineering enterprises / M.V. 
Golovko, V.A. Rudenko, N.I. Krivoshlikov // Espacios. 2018. Т. 39. № 31. рр. 28-42. 
4. Golovko M.V. Social Entrepreneurship as A Promising Way to Economic Security / 
M.V.Golovko, S.P. Agapova, A.V. Antsibor // International journal of applied exercise physiology. 
2019. Т. 8. Vol 2.1. Special vol: SI. рр. 539-548. 
5. Plotnikov V., RodinaV. Approach to information support and ensure theimplementation of 
PR-activities of the state industrial policy // Proceedings of the 28th International Business Information 
Management Association Conference - Vision 2020: Innovation Management, Development  
ustainability, and Competitive Economic Growth, 2017. рр. 1124-1132. 
 
 
 
Крушельницький М., к.е.н, 
ННЦ «Інститут аграрної економіки», 
м. Київ, Україна 
 
РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ СОЦІАЛЬНО-ЕКОНОМІЧНОЇ 
ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНОСТІ В СИСТЕМІ ІНСТИТУЦІОНАЛЬНОГО 
ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ АГРАРНОЇ СФЕРИ ЕКОНОМІКИ 
Вступ. Розвинуті країни на сучасному етапі ринкових відносин 
використовують різноманітні методичні підходи до регулювання економіки, 
зокрема щодо соціально-економічної відповідальності в аграрній сфері, що є 
фундаментальною основою розвитку країн і підвищення рівня життя всіх верств 
населення. Держава повинна створити таке середовище для 
сільськогосподарських підприємств, при якому вони будуть зацікавленні у 
підвищенні рівня соціально-економічного становища села. 


Formation of culture of economic safety corporate level

http://esnuir.eenu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/17542/1/Kravchenko%20557-560.pdf

Formation of culture of economic safety corporate level

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Electronic Eastern European National University Institutional Repository