Capability machines such as CHERI provide memory capabilities that can be
used by compilers to provide security benefits for compiled code (e.g., memory
safety). The C to CHERI compiler, for example, achieves memory safety by
following a principle called "pointers as capabilities" (PAC). Informally, PAC
says that a compiler should represent a source language pointer as a machine
code capability. But the security properties of PAC compilers are not yet well
understood. We show that memory safety is only one aspect, and that PAC
compilers can provide significant additional security guarantees for partial
programs: the compiler can provide guarantees for a compilation unit, even if
that compilation unit is later linked to attacker-controlled machine code. This
paper is the first to study the security of PAC compilers for partial programs
formally. We prove for a model of such a compiler that it is fully abstract.
The proof uses a novel proof technique (dubbed TrICL, read trickle), which is
of broad interest because it reuses and extends the compiler correctness
relation in a natural way, as we demonstrate. We implement our compiler on top
of the CHERI platform and show that it can compile legacy C code with minimal
code changes. We provide performance benchmarks that show how performance
overhead is proportional to the number of cross-compilation-unit function
calls
