Bailey, Michael J

Beasley, Richard W

Bellomo, Rinaldo

Bennett, Victoria

Carpenter, Maude

Closey, David

Deane, Adam M

Doherty, Sarah

Eastwood, Glenn M

Finfer, Simon

Freebairn, Ross C

Glasby, Kathleen

Hacking, Danielle

Henderson, Seton

Hunt, Anna

Hurford, Sally

Lawrey, Ywain

Linke, Natalie

Litton, Edward

Mackle, Diane M

McArthur, Colin J

McGuinness, Shay P

Mehrtens, Jan

Minto, Emmeline

Morris, Anna

Navarra, Leanlove

Noble, Sascha

Palermo, Annamaria

Panwar, Rakshit

Parker, Kim

Peck, Leah

Pellicano, Susan

Poole, Alex

Rivett, Justine

Sol Cruz, Raulle

Young, Helen

Young, Paul J

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the intensive care unit randomised trial comparing two approaches to oxygen therapy (ICU-ROX) pilot phase, which included the first 100 patients of an overall sample of 1000, was to examine feasibility. DESIGN: Investigator-initiated, prospective, parallel-group, pilot randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Six medical-surgical intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand, with participants recruited from September 2015 through June 2016. PARTICIPANTS: 100 patients ≥ 18 years of age who required invasive mechanical ventilation in the ICU and were expected to be receiving it beyond the next calendar day at the time of randomisation. INTERVENTIONS: Conservative oxygen therapy or standard care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eligibility, recruitment rate, and separation in oxygen exposure (fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2] and oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry [SpO2Z]). RESULTS: 94 of 99 participants (94.9%) were confirmed by study monitors to fulfil the study eligibility criteria. 3.6 patients per site per month were enrolled (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-4.7). Patients allocated to conservative oxygen therapy spent significantly more time on an FiO2 of 0.21 in the ICU; median, 31.5 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 7-63.5) for conservative oxygen therapy patients v 0 hours for standard oxygen therapy patients (IQR, 0-10; midpoint difference, 21.5 hours; 95% CI, 9-34; P &lt; 0.0001). Patients allocated to conservative oxygen therapy spent less time in the ICU with an SpO2Z of ≥ 97% than patients allocated to standard oxygen therapy; median, 18.5 hours (IQR, 5-46) for conservative oxygen therapy patients v 32 hours for standard oxygen therapy (IQR, 17-80; midpoint difference, 13.5 hours; 95% CI, 2-25; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm the feasibility of completing the ICU-ROX trial without the need for substantive changes to the study protocol for the remaining 900 trial participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTRN 12615000957594).</p

Monash University Research Portal

English

Intensive care unit randomised trial comparing two approaches to oxygen therapy (ICU-ROX):results of the pilot phase

Intensive care unit randomised trial comparing two approaches to oxygen therapy (ICU-ROX):results of the pilot phase

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Monash University Research Portal