International Association for Translation and Intercultural Studies
Abstract
Post-editing (PE) of machine translation (MT) is becoming more and more common in the
professional translation setting. However, many users refuse to employ MT due to bad quality
of the output it provides and even reject post-editing job offers. This can change by improving
MT quality from the point of view of the PE process. This article investigates different types of
MT errors and the difficulties they pose for PE in terms of post-editing time and technical effort.
For the experiment we used English to German translations performed by MT engines. The
errors were previously annotated using the MQM scheme for error annotation. The sentences
were post-edited by students in translation. The experiment allowed us to make observations
about the relation between technical and temporal PE effort, as well as to discover the types of
errors that are more challenging for PE
