Hughes, Donald A., Jr.

English

UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)

North Dakota Law Review Volume 60 Number 3 Article 8 1984 Selected Journal Articles concerning Agricultural Law and Debtor/Creditor Relations: 1970-1983 Donald A. Hughes Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr  Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Hughes, Donald A. Jr. (1984) "Selected Journal Articles concerning Agricultural Law and Debtor/Creditor Relations: 1970-1983," North Dakota Law Review: Vol. 60 : No. 3 , Article 8. Available at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr/vol60/iss3/8 This Index is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Dakota Law Review by an authorized editor of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact und.commons@library.und.edu. BIBLIOGRAPHYSELECTED JOURNAL ARTICLES CONCERNINGAGRICULTURAL LAW AND DEBTOR/CREDITORRELATIONS: 1970-1983COMPILED BY DONALD A. HUGHES, JR.*Alagia, Federal Milk Market Order Regulations: A Defense, 24 S.D.L.REV. 592 (1979).Alagia, Exempt or Non-Exempt Cooperatives - A Difficult Choice, 23S.D.L. REV. 547 (1978).Alagia, Federal Milk Marketing Orders: A Fair Return to the Dairy FarmerIs Not Undue Enhancement, 21 S.D.L. REV. 591 (1976).Baarda, Principles of Farm Enterprise Definition - Some Possible Factors,22 S.D.L. REV. 494 (1977).Barnes, An Alternative to Alternate Farm Valuation: The Conveyance ofConservation Easements to an Agricultural Land Trust, 1981-82AGRIC. L.J. 308.Berde, Overview of Legal Problems Affecting Cooperatives, 1980-81AGRIC. L.J. 40.M.A., University of Connecticut, 1978; M.L.S., Southern Connecticut State College, 1981;J.D., University of Connecticut, 1981; Public Service Librarian, Thorrnodsgard Law Library,University of North Dakota.NORTH DAKOTA LAW REVIEWBlack & Sufrin, Agricultural Cooperatives: Price-Fixing and the AntitrustExemption, 11 U.C.D. L. REV. 537 (1978).Bock, Farm Partnership Formation and Operation, 1981-82 AGRIC. L.J.504.Boehlje & Boehlje, Intergeneration Transfers: Is Agriculture Unique?, 112TR. & EST. 172 (1973).Brady, The Farmers Home Administration Community Facility Program: AMandate for Rural Development, 23 S.D.L. REV. 585 (1978).Brake, A Perspective on Federal Involvement in Agricultural CreditPrograms, 19 S.D.L. REV. 567 (1974).Childs, Valuation of Real Property Based on Farm or Other Business Use:How Well Do the Proposed Regulations Track with the InternalRevenue Code Provisions and Existing Case Law?, 25 S.D.L. REV.528 (1980).Clark, The Agricultural Transaction: Livestock Financing, 11 U.C.C.L.J. 106 (1978).Comment, Alien Ownership of South Dakota Farmland.: A Menace to theFamily Farm?, 23 S.D.L. REV. 735 (1978).Comment, Beyond Pesticides: Encouraging the Use of Integrated PestManagement in California, 11 U.C.D. L. REV. 301 (1978).Comment, Condemnation of Agricultural Property in California, 11U.C.D. L. REV. 555 (1978).Comment, Creditor Required to Furnish Debtor Notice of Repossession Saleof Livestock and Farm Machinery, 58 N.D.L. REV. 313 (1982).Comment, The Effect of Warranties on Seed Sales with an Eye to theU. C. C., Unconscionability and the California Agricultural Code, 11U.C.D. L. REV. 335 (1978).Comment, Frustration as an Agricultural Buyer's Excuse Under U. C. C.Section 2-615, 11 U.C.D. L. REV. 351 (1978).576 [VOL. 60:575BIBLIOGRAPHYComment, Grading for Quality and Quantity: Commodity RegulationUnder § 1622 of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, 7 U. TOL.L. REV. 1107 (1976).Comment, Liability In Crop Dusting: A Survey, 42 Miss. L.J. 104(1971).Comment, The Nebraska Farmer and U. C. C. Section 2-201(2): TheMerchant Exception to the Statute of Frauds, 13 CREIGHTON L. REV.325 (1979).Comment, North Dakota's Corporate Farming Statute: An Analysis ofRecent Change in the Law, 58 N.D.L. REV. 283 (1982).Comment, Oral Contracts for the Sale ofAgricultural Products, 22 S.D.L.REV. 619 (1977).Comment, Reclamation Law in Litigation: Acreage and ResidencyLimitations on Private Lands, 21 S.D.L. REV. 695 (1976).Comment, The South Dakota Family Farm Act of 1974: Salvation orFrustrationfor the Family Farmer?, 20 S.D.L. REV. 575 (1975).Comment, South Dakota's Article Nine: A Time for Change, 28 S.D.L.REV. 413 (1983).Comment, Strict Liability and U. C. C. Warranties Down on the Farm, 21S.D.L. REV. 669 (1976).Comment, Tort Liability of Agricultural Landowners to RecreationalEntrants: A CriticalAnalysis, 11 U.C.D. L. REV. 367 (1978).Dewey, Cooperatives: Identifying and Clarifying the Responsibilities, 23S.D.L. REV. 536 (1978).Dronet, Federal Preemption of State Food Standards: The Egg ProductsInspection Act as a Case in Point, 11 U.C.D. L. REV. 511 (1978).Dunford & O'Neill, An Analysis of Alternative Approaches to EstimatingAgricultural Use- Values, 1981-82 AGRIC. L.J. 285.Durham, Farms and Farming: Gentlemen Farmers, New Hobby LossRules; Holding Period, Etc., 29 INST. ON FED. TAX'N 1527(1971).1984]NORTH DAKOTA LAW REVIEWEstes, How Cash Basis Farmer Patrons May Avoid the Constructive Receiptof Crop Proceeds and Defer Recognition of Farm Income, 1979-80AGRIC. L.J. 552.Falk, Crop Failures and Section 2-615 of the Uniform Commercial Code, 22S.D.L. REV. 529 (1977).Falls, Farmworker Production Cooperatives: The Property Interests ofMembers, 11 U.C.D. L. REV. 661 (1978).Fishman, Revised Installment Provisions Breathe New Life Into Farmer'sDeferred-Payment Contracts, 54 J. TAX. 94 (1981).Flavin, The Functions of the Judicial Officer, United States Department ofAgriculture, 26 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 277 (1958).Fraas, Federal Assistance Programs for Farmers: An Outline for Lawyers,1981-82 AGRIC. L.J. 405.Fuller, Farm-LaborRelations, 8 IDAHO L. REV. 66 (1971).Furvseth, The Oregon Agricultural Protection Program: A Review andAssessment, 20 NAT. RESOURCESJ. 603 (1980).Geske, Deferral of Income from Crop Sales Under the New Installment SalesRevision Act, 1981-82 AGRIC. L.J. 13.Gilbertson, Condemnation ofAgricultural Land in South Dakota, 20 S.D.L. REV. 623 (1975).Grossman & Fisher, Protecting the Right to Farm: Statutory Limits onNuisance Actions Against the Farmer, 1983 Wis. L. REV. 95.Guenzel, The Relationship Between Cooperatives and Their Members inLitigation, 21 S.D.L. REv. 628 (1976).Hamilton, Freedom to Farm! Understanding the Agricultural Exemption toCounty Zoning in Iowa, 31 DRAKE L. REV. 565 (1981).Hanna, "Right to Farm" Statutes- The Newest Tool in Agricultural LandPreservation, 10 FLA. ST. U.L. REV. 415 (1982).578 [VOL. 60:575BIBLIOGRAPHYHannah, Trespassers, Licensees, and Invitees on Illinois Farm Land forRecreation, S. ILL. U.L.J. 369 (1980).Harkin & Harkin, "Roosevelt to Reagan" Commodity Programs and theAgriculture andFoodAct of 1981, 31 DRAKE L. REV. 499 (1981).Harl, Special Use Valuation: The Standout from TRA '76, 122 TR. &EST. 12 (Apr. 1983).Harrison, Parity, Politics and Procedures - A Proposal for Reform inDetermining Parity for Dairy Industry, 21 S.D.L. REV. 617(1976).Heady, Public Policies in Relation in Farm Size and Structure, 23 S.D.L.REV. 608 (1978).Heady, Externalities ofAmerican Agricultural Policy, 7 U. TOL. L. REV.795 (1976).Healy & Short, The Market for Rural Land: Trends, Issues, Policies,ENVTL. L. NEWSLETTER 3 (Summer 1981).Henkel & Shedd, Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code: Is a Farmera "Merchant" or a "Tiller of the Soil"?, 18 AM. Bus. L.J. 323(1980).Heron & Hayes, Reparations Proceedings Under the PerishableAgricultural Commodities Act- Valuable Tool in Need of Change, 22S.D.L. REV. 519 (1977).Hess, State and Local Measures for Preserving Illinois Farmland: AnAssessment and Proposal, 1982 S. ILL. U.L.J. 403 (1982).Hjorth, Farm Losses and Related Provisions, 25 TAX. L. REV. 581(1970).Hoff, Foreign Investments in U.S. Farmland - The Facts and the Law, 31DRAKE L. REV. 547 (1981-82).Hoffman, The FmHA Security Interest: Are Remedies Divisablefrom Perfection and Priority, 24 S.D.L. REV. 753 (1979).1984]NORTH DAKOTA LAW REVIEWHopkinson, State Regulation of Milk Producer Pricing and Sales inCalifornia, 11 U.C.D.L. REV. 491 (1978).Huffaker, The Regulation of Pesticide Use in California, 11 U.C.D. L.REV. 273 (1978).Huntington, Limited Partnerships: Estate Planning Vehicle for the FamilyFarm, 59 NEB. L. REV. 55 (1980).Juergensmeyer, Farmland Preservation: A Vital Agricultural Law Issue.for the 1980's, 21 WASHBURN L.J. 443 (1981-82).Juergensmeyer, Introduction: State and Local Land Use Planning andControl in the Agricultural Context, 25 S.D.L. REV. 463 (1980).Kelley, The Farm Corporation as an Estate Planning Device, 54 NEB. L.REV. 217 (1975).Knobbe & Ridenour, Midstream Incorporation in Agriculture: Deflectionof 'Income' to Corporate Transferee, 7 U. TOL. L. REV. 863 (1975-76).Levi & Rogers, Keogh Investment Funding Choices by Farmers and OtherSelf- Employed Persons, 54 NEB. L. REV. 315 (1975).Looney, Legal and Economic Considerations in Drafting Arkansas FarmLeases, 35 ARK. L. REV. 395 (1981-82).Looney & Byrd, Protecting the Farmer in Grain Marketing Transactions,31 DRAKE L. REV. 519 (1981-82).Looney, Hamilton & Culver, Marketing Farm Products: The Farmer asCreditor and Related Problems of Bankruptcy, 1982-83 AGRIC. L.J.565.Masson & Eisenstat, The Pricing Policies and Goals of Federal MilkOrder Regulations: Time for Reevaluation, 23 S.D.L. REV. 662(1978).Matthews, Agricultural Law, 49 UMKC L. REV. 405 (1981).McClaughry, Farmers, Freedom and Feudalism: How to Avoid theComing Serfdom, 21 S.D.L. REV. 486 (1976).[VOL. 60:575BIBLIOGRAPHYMegysey, Governmental Authority to Regulate the Use and Application ofPesticides: State vs. Federal, 21 S.D.L. REV. 652 (1976).Meth, Guidelines for Sustaining the Special Use Valuation of Property, 8EST. PLAN. 30 (1981).Meyer, Marketing Farm Products: The Farmer as Debtor and RelatedProblems of the Buyers of Farm Products, 1982-83 AGRIC. L.J. 542.Mogel, Food, Fuel, and Federal Curtailment Regulations, 56 CHI.-KENTL. REV. 789 (1980).Mohn, Recent Cooperative Developments - Implications for the Future, 23S.D.L. REV. 524 (1978).Morrison, State Corporate Farm Legislation, 7 U. TOL. L. REV. 961(1976).Morrison & Vacovsky, Estate and Income Tax Treatment of a Decedent'sFarm Crops and Rents, 4 CREIGHTON L. REV. 67 (1971).Note, Agricultural Financing under the U. C. C., 12 ARIZ. L. REV. 391(1970).Note, Agricultural Law: Suburban Sprawl and the Right to Farm, 22WASHBURN L.J. 448 (1983).Note, Debtor Exemption Laws and the Farmer. Suggestions for JudicialReform, 11 U.C.D. L. REV. 573 (1978).Note, The Family Farm Protection Act: What Does It Accomplish?, 36SASK. L. REV. 169 (1971-72).Note, Implied Warranties in the Sale of Diseased Livestock in Iowa; AReturn to Caveat Emptor?, 31 DRAKE L. REV. 637 (1981).Note, Severance Taxes and Soil Depletion: Is Grain a Natural ResourceAmenable to Severance Taxation?, 31 DRAKE L. REV. 621 (1981).Note, Tax: Accounting and Inventory Valuation Methods for Farmers, 22WASHBURN L.J. 513 (1983).Phelps, Corporate Farming Statutes, 2 WHITTIER L. REV. 441 (1980).19841582 NORTH DAKOTA LAW REVIEW [VOL. 60:575Pinney, Agricultural Tax Problems, Including the 'Prepaid Feed'Controversy, 25 MAJOR TAX. PLAN. 477 (1973).Pinney & Olson, Farmers' Prepaid Feed Expenses, 25 TAX. LAW. 537(1972).Rowley & Beshore, Chicken Integrators' Price Fixing: A Fox in theCapper- Volstead Coop, 24 S.D.L. REV. 564 (1979).Scher, Catz & Mathews, USDA: Agriculture at the Expense of SmallFarmers and Farmworkers, 7 U. TOL. L. REV. 837 (1976).Schumann, Farm Sales: Tax Considerations, 1979-80 AGRIC. L.J. 629.Smith, Sorenson & Rappaport, The Successorship Issue - SpecialConsiderations in California, 9 PEPPERDINE L. REV. 1041 (1982).Studenberg, Acreage Limitation and the Applicability of the ReclamationExtension Act of 1914, 21 S.D.L. REV. 737 (1976).Taylor, Public Policy and the Shaping of Rural Society, 20 S.D.L. REV.475(1975).Thompson, Farm Financial Distress: Nature, Scope, and Measurementof the Problem, 1982-83 AGRIC. L.J. 450.Thompson, Defining and Protecting the Right to Farm, 5 ZONING &PLAN. L. REP. 65 (1982).Todd, The Right to Farm in Oregon, 18 WILLIAMETTE L.J. 153 (1982).Tomain, Compensable Regulations and an Alternative CompensationSystem, 21 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 89 (1981).Torgerson, Cooperative Forms of Agribusiness for Use in Indian Country,26 S.D.L. REV. 564 (1981).Trotzig, Express and Implied Warranties of the Uniform Commercial Codezn Seed Sales: Agricultural Services Association, Inc. v. Ferry-MorseSeed Co., 23 S.D.L. REV. 786 (1978).Vanberg, Price Supports, Parity and Peanuts, 1980-81 AGRIC. L.J.362.1984] BIBLIOGRAPHY 583Warlich & Brill, Cooperatives vis-a-vis Corporations: Size, Antitrust, andImmunity, 23 S.D.L. REV. 561 (1978).Warren, Agricultural Land: Ownership in Fee Simple or Held in Trust, 11U.C.D. L. REV. 65 (1978).Watson, Preferential Assessment of Agricultural Property in South Dakota,22 S.D.L. REV. 632 (1977).Weiss, Reasons for and Costs of Registration of Agricultural CooperativeSecurities, 1981-82 AGRIC. L.J. 201.Wershow, Agriculture and the Law, 54 FLA. B.J. 29 (1980).Williams, Alien Ownership of Kansas Farmland: Can It Be Prohibited?,20 WASHBURN L.J. 514 (1981).Wright, Markets, Time, and Damages: Some Unsolved Problems in theField of Crops, 14 IND. L. REV. 647 (1981).Yiannopoulos, Standing Crops: Movables or Immovables?, 17 Loy. L.REV. 323 (1971).Zedalis, Agricultural Trade and Section 22, 31 DRAKE L. REV. 587(1981).

Selected Journal Articles concerning Agricultural Law and Debtor/Creditor Relations: 1970-1983

https://commons.und.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2135&amp;context=ndlr

Selected Journal Articles concerning Agricultural Law and Debtor/Creditor Relations: 1970-1983

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)