slides

Redshift Filtering by Swift Apparent X-ray Column Density

Abstract

We remark on the utility of an observational relation between the absorption column density in excess of the Galactic absorption column density, Ξ”NH=NH,fitβˆ’NH,gal\Delta N_{\rm H} = N_{\rm H, fit} - N_{\rm H, gal}, and redshift, z, determined from all 55 Swift-observed long bursts with spectroscopic redshifts as of 2006 December. The absorption column densities, NH,fitN_{\rm H, fit}, are determined from powerlaw fits to the X-ray spectra with the absorption column density left as a free parameter. We find that higher excess absorption column densities with Ξ”NH>2Γ—1021\Delta N_{\rm H} > 2\times 10^{21} cmβˆ’2^{-2} are only present in bursts with redshifts z<<2. Low absorption column densities with Ξ”NH<1Γ—1021\Delta N_{\rm H} < 1\times 10^{21} cmβˆ’2^{-2} appear preferentially in high-redshift bursts. Our interpretation is that this relation between redshift and excess column density is an observational effect resulting from the shift of the source rest-frame energy range below 1 keV out of the XRT observable energy range for high redshift bursts. We found a clear anti-correlation between Ξ”NH\Delta N_{\rm H} and z that can be used to estimate the range of the maximum redshift of an afterglow. A critical application of our finding is that rapid X-ray observations can be used to optimize the instrumentation used for ground-based optical/NIR follow-up observations. Ground-based spectroscopic redshift measurements of as many bursts as possible are crucial for GRB science.Comment: revised version including updates and the referee's comments, accepted for publication in the Astronomical Journal, 12 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables - v3 contains an update on the reference lis

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions

    Last time updated on 01/04/2019