The ‘‘framing effect’’ is observed when the description of options in terms of gains (positive
frame) rather than losses (negative frame) elicits systematically different choices. Few theories
explain the framing effect by using cognitive information-processing principles. In this paper
we present an explanatory theory based on the cost–benefit tradeoffs described in contingent
behavior. This theory proposes that individuals examining various alternatives try to determine
how to make a good decision while expending minimal cognitive effort. For this study,
we used brain activation functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to evaluate individuals
that we asked to choose between one certain alternative and one risky alternative in
response to problems framed as gains or losses. Our results indicate that the cognitive effort
required to select a sure gain was considerably lower than the cognitive effort required to
choose a risky gain. Conversely,the cognitive effort expended in choosing a sure loss was equal
to the cognitive effort expended in choosing a risky loss. fMRI revealed that the cognitive
functions used by the decision makers in this study were localized in the prefrontal and
parietal cortices of the brain,a finding that suggests the involvement of working memory
and imagery in the selection process