The somatic chromosome numbers are presented of 90 Begonia spp. of African, Asian and American origin, including a few of those previously listed [see H.A., 40: 1600] whose nomenclature or chromosome numbers are reconsidered. Sixteen different numbers were found, ranging between 16 and 76. The most common were 28 (26 species), 38 (10 species) and 56 (15 species). [For related work see H.A., 41: 7120.]. (Abstract retrieved from CAB Abstracts by CABI’s permission

Doorenbos, J.

Legro, R.A.H.

English

NARCIS 

Chromosome numbers in. Begonia. 2.

Wageningen UR (University & Research Centre): Publication System

Neth. J. agric. Sei. 19 (1971) 176—183 
Chromosome numbers in Begonia 2* 
R. A. H. Legro 1 and J. Doorenbos 2 
1 Laboratory of Plant Taxonomy, Agricultural University, Wageningen, the Netherlands 
2 Laboratory of Horticulture, Agricultural University, Wageningen, the Netherlands 
Received: 7 May 1971 
Summary 
The somatic chromosome numbers of 90 species of Begonia were established. The fol­
lowing numbers were found: 16, 22, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64 
and 76. B. gigantea Wall. (2n = 16) has the lowest chromosome number reported so 
far in Begonia. The conclusion of a previous paper that 22, 28 and 56 are the most 
common numbers within the genus was confirmed, but it was found that there is also 
a considerable number of species with 2n = 38. 
Introduction 
At the conclusion of a previous publication (Legro and Doorenbos, 1969) in which the 
chromosome numbers of 100 species of Begonia were given, the prospect was held out 
that shortly the chromosome numbers of another 100 species would be made known. 
The present article only partly fulfils this promise. In many species, the cytological 
observations presented more difficulties than expected. Other plants have not yet been 
identified with certainty. As a result, only ninety chromosome counts, not all of them 
conclusive, can be added to those of our previous paper. 
In the course of the present study, a few imperfections of the first paper have come 
to light, viz a few cases of incorrect nomenclature and one case of an incorrect chromo­
some number. The species concerned have been listed again and are mentioned sepa­
rately in the discussion. 
Material and methods 
Much of the plant material came from the sources mentioned in the first paper. 
An important contribution, mainly of Mexican species, was made by R. Ziesenhenne 
of Santa Barbara, California. Mrs. J. Neal of Worthing, Surrey, England, sent us several 
species, such as B. prismatocarpa, B. venusta and B. pavonina, the latter two collected 
in the Cameron mountains in Malaya. J. J. Bos gave us a number of species collected 
in the Cameroons, such as B. elatostemmoides, B. mannii and B. quadrialata, and in 
Natal, such as B. princeae. B. ficicola was brought by M. C. G. Middelburg from the 
type locality (Ekumbe) in the Cameroons. B. keniensis was collected by J. J. F. E. de 
* Publication 356, Laboratorium voor Tuinbouwplantenteelt, Landbouwhogeschool, Wageningen, the 
Netherlands. 
176 
CHROMOSOME NUMBERS IN BEGONIA. 2 
Wilde in Ethiopia. J. F. M. Zieck sent us several species from New Guinea, such as 
B. physandra. 
Correct identification is a perennial problem in this genus, of which no modern 
monograph exists. The species have been compared with all available descriptions, but 
not with type material. Of the plants studied, voucher specimens have been deposited 
in WAG, the Herbarium of the Department of Plant Taxonomy of the Agricultural 
University at Wageningen. 
Some authors have used a wider species concept than is used in the present study. 
Smith and Schubert in particular consider several of the specific names used here to 
be synonymous with others. In many cases the present authors agree with them, but 
nevertheless it seemed advisable to use a narrow species concept in this study, as cyto-
logical differences between morphologically related plants might well have come to light. 
The chromosomes were studied in squash preparations of root tips according to the 
methods described in the previous paper. 
Results 
The results are presented in Table 1, which is set up in the same way as Table 1 of 
the previous article. Species marked with an asterisk have been mentioned already in the 
Table 1. Survey of somatic chromosome numbers in Begonia species in comparison with numbers 
mentioned by previous authors. 
Literature data 
2n 2n authors1 year 
African species 
Squamibegonia 
B. haulevilleana De Wild. 38 
Augustia 
B. caffra Meissn. 26 
B. princeae Gilg 26 
B. suffruticosa Meissn. 26 
Scutobegonia 
B. ficicola Irmsch. 34 -1- + + 
B. elatostemmiodes Hook. f. (38) 
Loasibegonia 
B. prismatocarpa Hook. f. 32 
Tetraphila (Fusibegonia) 
B. mannii Hook. f. 38 
B. polygonoides Hook. f. 36 + + 
*B. spraguei C. M. Weber (B. parva Sprague) 36+ + 
Rostrobegonia 
B. johnstonii Oliv. 26 
B. keniensis Gilg (38) 
Asiatic species 
Haagea 
B. dipetala Grah. 33 ca. 28 
Reichenheimia 
B. floccifera Bedd. 28+ + + + or 32 30 
B. rajah Ridl. 30+ + 
Heitz 1927 
S. & B. 1957 
Nelh. J. agric. Sei. 19 (1971) 177 
R. A. H. LEGRO AND J. DOORENBOS 
Table 1 (Continued) 
Literature data 
2n 2n authors1 year 
Spenanthera 
B. roxburghii A.DC. 22 
Monopteron 
B. gigantea Wall. 16 28, 32, 34, S. & B. 1961 
40, 42 
B. griffithiana (A.DC.) Warb. 22 
Platycentrum 
B. pavonina Ridl. 22 
B. tenuifolia Dryand. 22 
B. venusta Ridl. 44 
B. versicolor Irmsch. 22 
Diploclinium 
B. subnummularifolia Mer. (32) 
Parvibegonia 
B. crenata Dryand. 56 
Petermannia 
B. brevirimosa Irmsch. 44 
B. sp. New Guinea 30 
Knesebeckia 
B. cyclophylla Hook. f. 22 
Section unknown 
B. physandra Merr. & Perry 28 
American species 
Doratometra 
B. franconis Liebm. 26 
Scheidweileria 
B. luxurians Scheidw. 56 
Steineria 
B. hookeriana Gard. (56) 
B. oxyphylla A.DC. (56) 
Pritzelia 
B. crispula Brade (38) 
B. epipsila Brade (56) 
B. hispida Schott var. cucullifera Irmsch. 56 
B. hugelii A.DC. 56 
B. itaguassiensis Brade 38 + + 
B. listida hort. (76) 
B. olsoniae Sm. & Schub, (vellozoana Brade) 56 
B. paleata A.DC. (38) 
B. paranaensis Brade (56) 
B. princeps (Kl.) A.DC. (48) 48 Piton 1962 
B. pulchella Raddi (56) 
B. sarmentacea hort. (38) 
B. scabrida A.DC. 48 
B. scharffiana Regel (56) 
B. tomentosa Schott (56) 
B. valida Goebel (38) 36, 38 Heitz 1927 
B. vitifolia Schott 38 
(acerfolia hort. non HBK) 
B. vitifolia Schott 38 36 Hamel 1937 
(reniformis Hook. f. non Dry.) 
Solananthera 
B. solananthera A.DC. 56 
Weilbachia 
B. purpusii Zies. 28 
178 Neth. J. agric. Sei. 19 (1971) 
CHROMOSOME NUMBERS IN BEGONIA. 2 
Table 1 (Continued) 
B. pustulata Liebm. 
Huszia 
*B. micranthera Griseb. 
var. hieronymii (Lind.) Sm. & Schub, 
var. fimbriata hort. 
var. foliosa Sm. & Schub, 
var. venturia hort. 
Giroudia 
B. barkeri Knowles & Westc. 
B. chivatoa Zies. 
B. cobana C.DC. 
B. daedalea Lemoine 
B. kortsae Zies. 
B. hypolipara Sandw. 
B. lindleyana Walp. 
B. megaphylla A.DC. 
B. plebeja Liebm. 
B. pringlei S. Watson 
B. sericoneura Liebm. 
B. squamosa C.DC. 
B. squarrosa Liebm. 
(hepaticamaculata Zies.) 
B. villipetiola C.DC. 
Latistigma 
B. aconitifolia A.DC. 
B. platanifolia Schott 
Begoniastrum 
B. crinita Oliv. 
B. cucullata Willd. 
B. cucullata var. hookeri 
(A.DC.) Sm. & Schub. 
B. fischeri Schrank var. tovarensis Irmsch. 
B. hirtella Willd. 
B. leptotricha C.DC. 
B. leptotricha 'Woolly-bear' 
B. mollicaulis Irmsch. 
(subvillosa hort. non Klotzsch) 
B. parvifolia Schott 
B. porteriana Fisch. 
B. rotundifolia Lam. 
B. semperflorens Link & Otto 
Knesebeckia 
B. bulbillifera Link & Otto 
B. biserrata Lindl, (palmaris A.DC.) 
B. cavum Zies. 
*B. ignea Warsz. (palmaris hort. non A.DC.) 
B. kellermannii C.DC. 
B. martiana Link & Otto 
B. uniflora S. Watson (taylori hort.) 
B. viscida Zies. 
B. wollnyi Herzog 
Tetrachia 
B. egregia N. E. Br. 
Literature data 
2n authors1 year 
56 Bowden 
36 Piton 
34 Zeilinga 1962 
+  + +  
2n 
38 
28 
27 
28 
27 
28 
28 
28 
28 
28 
28 
28 
28 
28 
28 
28 
28 
28 
28 
60 
60 
(34) 
(64) 
34 
34 
34 
34 
34 
34 
32 
60 
52 
(34) 
28 
28 
28 
56 
28 + 
56 
28 
28 
28 
(52) 
1 S. & B. = Sharma and Bhattacharyya, 1961. 
Neth. J. agric. Sei. 19 (1971) 179 
R. A. H. LEGRO AND J. DOORENBOS 
latter, but are repeated here because it appeared necessary to reconsider nomenclature 
or chromosome number. 
Some results have been included here that are not yet fully conclusive. These tenta­
tive chromosome counts appear in the Table between brackets. The authors are fairly 
certain that they are correct, but have not been able to find sufficient cells showing 
distinct metaphase chromosomes which could be counted without any doubt. 
Discussion 
To the 18 different chromosome numbers listed in our previous article, the present 
results add only four new ones : 16, 32, 64 and 76, the last two being tentative counts. 
The recurrence of the same numbers and the fact that some appear to be characteristic 
of certain sections lead to the emergence of a pattern; the cytology of this genus 
may not be so complicated after all. 
The chromosome numbers of West African species studied so far lie between 32 
and 38. The determination of the exact number is hampered by the occurrence of bits 
of chromatin smaller than regular chromosomes. If these are not fragments, as has 
been assumed here, but chromosomes, the prevalent chromosome number among West 
African species would appear to be 38, at least within the large sections Scutobegonia 
and Tetraphila. The dainty B. prismatocarpa, however, which belongs to Loasibegonia, 
has 32 chromosomes. 
In East Africa the number 26 is prevalent among the sections Augustia and Rostro-
begonia. So far, B. keniensis (2n = 38) is the only exception. As this is a typical re­
presentative of Rostrobegonia, it may be of triploid origin. It is to be regretted that 
none of the 20 Begonia species of Madagascar (sections Mezierea, Erminea, Quadrilo-
baria, etc.) was available for study. 
Among the Asiatic species studied, B. gigantea is the most interesting from a cyto-
logical point of view. Not only does it have the smallest number of chromosomes of 
all 190 species studied, but it is also the only species in which the individual chromo­
somes of the genome can be recognized (Fig. 1). The count of 2n = 16 for this species 
leads to the speculation that the number of 2n = 22, found in the Asiatic sections 
Platycentrum and Sphenanthera, may have arisen from a cross between a species with 
2n = 16 and one with 2n = 28. The fact that B. griffithiana, morphologically very 
similar to B. gigantea and belonging to the same section, has 22 chromosomes supports 
this theory. Sharma and Bhattacharyya (1961) counted between 28 and 42 chromo­
somes for B. gigantea. These counts are very tentative (one wonders why they were 
published at all) but nevertheless render it highly unlikely that these authors had the 
same material as used for the present study. 
B. dipetala of the small section Haagea is often treated as a subspecies of B. mala-
barica Lam. Irmscher (1961) however, considers it a species in its own right, and the 
present chromosome counts support this opinion. B. venusta, which has 3-5-fid placentae 
while those of the other species of Platycentrum are bifid, appears to be tetraploid 
in relation to these other species. 
Knowledge of the large Asiatic sections Reichenheimia, Diploclinium and Peterman-
nia remains scanty. Most species of Petermannia from New Guinea appear to have 44 
chromosomes, but one unidentified species was found to have 30. Perhaps the species 
with 44 chromosomes arose from triploids of species with 30, rather than as tetra-
ploids of species with 22 chromosomes. 
180 Neih. J. agric. Sei. 19 (1971) 
CHROMOSOME NUMBERS IN BEGONIA. 2 
Fig. 1. Mitotic metaphase of Begonia gigantea Wall. Note the two very large chromosomes. Magni­
fication X 3100. 
The tuberous B. physandra has never been cultivated before. The ovaries (not described 
previously) were found to be two-celled. This probably makes it necessary to erect a 
new section for this species. 
Among American sections, Pritzelia is one of the largest. Further study of the species 
of this section has confirmed that they can be divided into a group with 38 and a 
group with 56 chromosomes. So far, no correlation was found between these chromo­
some numbers and the morphological characteristics of the plants. The pretty B. listida, 
undoubtedly a true species but as far as we know not properly described yet, appears 
to have 76 chromosomes. This means it is tetraploid in relation to those species of 
Pritzelia which have 38. 
B. princeps (2n = 48) may have originated as a hybrid between a species with 38 
and one with 56 chromosomes. A plant grown as B. scabrida A.DC. in botanic gardens, 
and in fairly good agreement with A. de Candolle's description (although not all pla­
centae are entire, as they should be), was also found to have 48 chromosomes. 
B. vitifolia stands badly in need of taxonomie study. This species as interpreted by 
De Candolle, is grown in collections under the erroneous name B. acerifolia (non HBK). 
Although even Irmscher maintains that B. reniformis Hook, (non Dryander) is synony­
mous with B. vitifolia, it is a different species. B. valida, on the other hand, appears 
Neth. J. agric. Sei. 19 (1971) 181 
R. A. H. LEGRO AND J. DOORENBOS 
Fig. 2. Mitotic early metaphase of Begonia plumieri A. DC., demonstrating the difficulties (small, 
very numerous chromosomes in a granular protoplasm) which have made it impossible to arrive at a 
conclusive chromosome count for this species. Magnification X 3000. 
to be closely related to B. vitifolia (sensu A.DC.). It is, however, beyond the scope 
of this article to solve these taxonomie puzzles. 
The section Giroudia appears to be very homogeneous cytologically. The chromosomes 
of these species are relatively easy to count, with the exception of those of B. pringlei. 
In this species, one has to find exactly the right stage of the metaphase. Otherwise, one 
gets the impression that there are more than 28, possibly because of strong constric­
tions of the chromosomes. Within the related section Weilbachia, B. pustulata (2n = 
38) is a notable exception among species with 28 chromosomes. 
B. micranthera var. hieronymii is the same plant as B. micranthera of the previous 
publication. It is a dioecious plant with large pink flowers, and of much interest for 
hybridizing purposes. The var. foliosa is also dioecious, but the small white flowers have 
no ornamental value. From the USA we received two monoecious forms with showy, 
orange flowers, which are grown under the names B. micranthera var. fimbriata and 
B. micranthera var. venturia. Neither confirms to the original description of these varie­
ties. Both were found to have 27 chromosomes. We regard the 'var. fimbriata' as a hybrid 
between B. cinnaharina (2n = 26) and, presumably, a form of B. micranthera with 
2n = 28, and the 'var. venturia' as a similar hybrid, although its parentage is less clear. 
Further study of Begoniastrum has shown that 34 is a common chromosome number 
in this section. The material of B. leptotricha was imported from two sources in Brazil 
182 Neth. J. agric. Sei. 19 (1971) 
CHROMOSOME NUMBERS IN BEGONIA. 2 
as an unidentified species. The Begonia known among growers in the USA as 'Woolly-
bear' differs from these imports in a more compact habit, broader, larger leaves and 
a denser fulvous tomentum. 
B. cucullata was imported as an unidentified species from Venezuela. It has a stiff, 
erect and succulent stem, persistent foliaceous denticulate stipules and acute seeds. It 
agrees in all respects with the old picture of Loddiges' B. spathulata, reproduced by 
Smith and Schubert (1941, p. 102). It appears to be tetraploid, although 64 chromo­
somes were counted rather than the expected 68 (the number 56, given in the previous 
paper, was an administrative error). The plant called here B. cucullata var. hookeri has 
a much more spreading habit, stipules that are less broad and less persistent, and blunt 
seed. This may be the wild ancestor of B. semperflorens, although in the material stu­
died there were several differences between the two. 
There are still about 30 species in the collection of which the chromosome numbers 
could not yet be established with a reasonable degree of certainty. The reasons for this 
are threefold. In some species, the number of metaphase plates found is too small to 
permit definitive conclusions. Examples of such species are B. dietrichiana Irmsch., 
B. fernandoi-costae Irmsch., B. obscura Brade, B. inciso-serrata A.DC., B. venosa Skan 
and many others. Other species do yield sufficient metaphase plates, but the attainment 
of conclusive results is rendered very difficult because the chromosomes are very small, 
and the protoplasm is full of other granules, which are hard to distinguish from true 
chromosomes. This group includes species as B. quadrialata Warb., B. angularis Raddi 
and B. lindeniana A.DC. A third group comprises such species in which the sheer num­
ber of the very small chromosomes (well over 100) makes counting an almost impos­
sible task. Examples of this (often complicated by granular protoplasm) are B. conval-
lariodora C.DC., B. serratifolia C.DC. and B. plumieri A.DC. (Fig. 2). Presumably, these 
species have to be studied by more sophisticated methods than the ones used in the 
present study. 
Literature 
Bowden, W. M., 1945. A list of chromosome numbers in higher plants. I. Acanthaceae to Myrtaceae. 
Am. 1. Bot. 32: 81-92. 
Hamel, J. C., 1937. Etudes caryologiques sur quelques Begoniacées. Revue Cytol. Biol. vég. 2: 392-413. 
Heitz, E., 1927. Über multiple und aberrante Chromosomenzahlen. Abh. Naturw. Ver. Hamburg 21 : 
48-58. 
Irmscher, E., 1961. Begoniaceae, Schiefblattgewächse. Parey's Blumengärtnerei, 2nd ed., Vol. 2 
p. 67-98; 838-839. Parey, Berlin. 
Legro, R. A. H. & J. Doorenbos, 1969. Chromosome numbers in Begonia. Neth. J. agric. Sei. 17 : 
189-202. 
Piton, F., 1962. Contributions à l'étude cytologique des Begoniacées. Rev. Cyt. Biol. vég. 24: 165-216. 
Sharma, A. K. & U. C. Bhattacharyya, 1956-67. Cytological studies in Begonia. 1. Cellule 58: 307-330. 
Sharma, A. K. & U. C. Bhattacharyya, 1961. Cytological studies in Begonia. 2. Caryologia 14: 279-301. 
Smith, L. B. & B. G. Schubert, 1941. Revision de la especies Argentinas del genero Begonia. Darwinia 
5: 78-117. 
Zeilinga, A. E. 1962. Cytological investigations of hybrid varieties of Begonia semperflorens. Euphytica 
126-136. 
Neth. J. agric. Sei. 19 (1971) 183 


https://library.wur.nl/ojs/index.php/njas/article/download/17312/16726

Chromosome numbers in. Begonia. 2.

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

NARCIS

Wageningen UR (University & Research Centre): Publication System