https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/encountering_hopewell/1009/thumbnail.jp

Redmond, Brian

English

The University of Akron

The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Encountering Hopewell in the Twenty-first Century, Ohio and Beyond The University of Akron Press 2020 Vol. 1 Ch. a Index Brian Redmond Cleveland Museum of Natural History, bredmond@cmnh.org Follow this and additional works at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/encountering_hopewell Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Recommended Citation Redmond, Brian, "Vol. 1 Ch. a Index" (2020). Encountering Hopewell in the Twenty-first Century, Ohio and Beyond. 10. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/encountering_hopewell/10 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by The University of Akron Press at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The University of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Encountering Hopewell in the Twenty-first Century, Ohio and Beyond by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact mjon@uakron.edu, uapress@uakron.edu. 265IndexAdena: 7, 10, 104, 106; Adena Culture, 104; Adena Mound, 151, 236; Adena Pipe, 251Albany Mounds (Illinois), 216alignment: lunar, 105, 117, 132–51; principles of, 118; solar, 105, 117; solstice, 102, 108, 140–42; stellar, 147–48; topographical, 117–18. See also TAG Hypothesisaltar: crypt, 202; scaffold, 202Anderson Earthworks (Ohio), 80Anderson Mounds (Indiana), 2, 4–9, 20–21; Mounds State Park, 4Angel site (Indiana), 151ArcGIS, 4avian surrounds, 231–64Baby, Raymond, 221Baum Earthworks (Ohio), 91, 151, 157Bertsch site (Indiana), 2, 4, 12–16, 20–21 Big House (stomp ground, Square Ground), 172Birdman, 234, 251–52, 258; Birdman Tablet, 249 Blackwater Group (Ohio), 2bladelet, lamellar, 70, 71, 85, 86, 90, 95, 97, 98; blade core, 71Blue River (Indiana), 9borrow pit, 55, 63, 66–67, 80, 88–93, 107 botanical remains: chenopodium, 95; Eastern Agricultural Complex, 95; little barley (Hordeum pusillum), 98; maygrass (Phalaris caroliniana), 95Bourneville Circle (Ohio), 28–29Brain-Taker, 183Breastplate. See copperbundle, 6, 169, 171, 197, 202, 212–18, 253–54Burks, Jarrod, 87Cahokia (Illinois), 101, 105, 151, 236, 249, 251–52Caldwell, Joseph, 83, 209–12Carr, Christopher, 209–11, 213–17ceramics: grit-tempered, 90, 95, 97; Hopewell Cross-hatched rim, 90, 239; New Castle Incised, 9; simple stamped, 71; tetrapodal, 86; zoned rocker stamped, 10, 71ceremony. See ritualChapel Hill site (Illinois), 236; copper plates, 254, 257charnel facilities, 154, 156, 158–61, 164–65, 167, 169–73, 183, 186–87, 202–3, 209, 238chenopodium, 95. See also botanical remainsCherokee Foundation of Life Ceremony. See ritualCherry Valley Oval. See Newark Earthworkschert: Flint Ridge, 90, 95, 97–98Chicoma Mountain (New Mexico), 106–7. See also World Center Shrinecircle-squaring algorithm, 123–26Circleville Earthwork (Ohio), 29, 102, 176Clay, R. Berle, 104Coffman Knob (Ohio), 141266 IndexCollective Burial Locale (CBL), 195–220; different kinds (cemetery vs. world renewal), 196; world renewal CBLs, 198Community Organization, 156, 203; Community Polity Model, 203–4, 210; Dual Heterarchy Model (Dual Comple-mentary Heterarchical Community/Cult Sodality Heterarchy Model), 205, 209, 213, 215, 217–18; Multiple Commu-nity Model 207–9; Vacant Center-Dis-persed Hamlet Model, 207–9configurational analyses, 233Conjoined Mound (Ohio). See Seip Earthworkscopper, 10, 17, 20, 82, 169, 178–81, 184, 234; copper cutouts, 235, 243, 248; copper earspool, 22, 65, 169, 178, 184, 227, 235, 237, 258; copper panpipe, 9; copper plate (breastplate), 7, 22, 175–76, 227, 235, 242, 244–45, 252–55, 257–58; copper plate (coronal), 237, 241–43, 246, 252–53; copper strips, 221–30; Cresap Mound (West Virginia), 236, 253cross-in-circle motif. See quartered circlecrystal quartz. See quartzCummings-McCarthy site (Illinois), 236, 254, 257Dancey, William, 84, 156, 207Datum H site (Ohio). See Hopewell Mound Groupdecommissioning. See termination ritesDigital Elevation Model (DEM), 2–3, 20; hillshade renderings, 2, 4, 7–8, 10, 12Digital Surface Model (DSM), 3dot-within-circle motif: representing souls, 174–75earspool. See copperearthwork form: circle, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 28–31, 101–2, 117–53; circle-square pairing, 9; circle-octagon, 119–32, 136, 148; geometry, 119–31; panduriform, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 15, 20; quatrefoil, 22; square/rectangu-lar, 1, 6, 10, 12, 15–17, 19, 30, 54, 60, 62–63, 66, 71, 81, 85, 88–89, 102, 118–50, 160; squircle (square with rounded corners, superellipse), 17, 19–20, 22, 63, 66, 68, 72; tripartite, 62, 91, 154, 158, 160–61, 164 earth oven, 31, 69, 71, 80, 86, 98, 106, 108; archaeological signature of, 98–101Eastern Agricultural Complex, 95. See also botanical remainselectrical resistivity. See geoelectric surveyEntrepreneurial/Funerary Model, 209–18Etowah site (Georgia), 234, 236, 250–52. See also Rogan Copper PlatesEuropean Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage, 52Fairfield-style gorgets, 235, 249Fairgrounds Circle (Great Circle). See Newark EarthworksFeast of the Dead. See ritualfeasting, 41, 86, 100–101, 104, 106–8forked eye motif. See avian surroundsFort Ancient Earthwork (Ohio): 26–49, 88, 90–92, 102–3; Moorehead Circle, 27–48, 88, 90, 102–3, 106; North Fort, 28Fort Hill Earthwork (Ohio), 30; William Reynolds Enclosure, 30franchising, custodial, 213–18Frankfort Earthworks/Works/Old Town (Ohio), 29, 80, 91, 130, 157, 177; Porter Mounds, 160Fudge Enclosure/Works (Indiana), 2, 4, 16–20 Funerary or Cemetery model, 199–200galena, 178, 184geoelectric survey, 8, 28, 55, 84Gilbert site (Indiana), 2, 22Gobëkli Tepe (Turkey), 50Gottschall Rockshelter (Wisconsin), 234, 236, 249, 255, 258Graves Enclosure/Works (Indiana), 2, 4, 16–20Great Circle (Fairgrounds Circle). See Newark EarthworksGreat Circle (Hopewell Mound Group). See Hopewell Mound GroupGreat Post Circle. See Stubbs EarthworkGreat Enclosure. See Hopewell Mound GroupGreber, N’omi, 30, 55, 63, 65, 71–73, 87, 103, 221–22, 227–28Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), 32, 36, 50, 54–55, 103, 222Index 267Hall, Robert L., 105–7, 175, 197–99Harness Mound (Edwin Harness Mound, Ohio). See Liberty EarthworksHavana site (Illinois), 234, 236High Bank Works (Ohio), 29–30, 34, 53, 87, 91, 102, 126–50Hopeton Earthworks (Ohio), 29, 53, 70, 87, 91, 102, 176Hopewell Culture National Historical Park (Ohio), 50, 53, 58, 71Hopewell Interaction Sphere, 83, 209–18Hopewell Measurement Unit (HMU), 30, 102, 125Hopewell Mound Group (Ohio), 7, 53, 79–108, 141, 157, 160, 175, 208, 216–18, 235–36, 257; Datum H, 86; Great Circle, 30–31, 34, 80–81, 85, 93–106; Great Enclosure, 81; Mound 25, 81, 88, 160–62, 167, 169, 173, 175–76, 183, 186, 216, 227–28, 234, 243, 248; North Gate Borrow Pits, 88–93, 107Horned Serpent, 178human sacrifice: lethal and postmortem, 196, 201–3Jemez Mountains (New Mexico), 107Jester Hill (Ohio), 135, 138, 142–44Junction Group (Ohio), 2, 22, 80Kanawha Co. Works (West Virginia), 2Key Marco site (Florida), 236, 256landscape-scale geophysics, 22, 50–73, 79–108Larimore Group (Ohio), 2Liberty (Harness) Earthworks (Ohio), 29, 70, 91, 126–27, 129–30, 132–41, 145–47, 157–58, 160–61, 176, 236, 238, 246–47, 257; Edwin Harness Mound, 160–61, 167, 173, 236, 238, 243, 246–47, 251–52LiDAR: method described, 2–4; potential, 51, 130Lilly, Eli, 8–9little barley (Hordeum pusillum), 98. See also botanical remainsLittle Miami River (Ohio), 26, 28, 33, 43, 102Liverpool Lake (Illinois) pendant, 257Logan Range. See Mount LoganLow site (West Virginia), 236, 257; Low Tablet, 248Lynott, Mark, 87magnetometry, 1–23, 28, 30, 36, 50–73; method described, 55–58Mann site (Indiana), 151mantling. See termination ritesMaumee River (Ohio), 171maygrass (Phalaris caroliniana), 95. See also botanical remainsmica, 6, 9, 40, 71, 82, 85–87, 169, 178, 183–84, 234–35, 243, 247–49, 258; mirrors 169, 178, 184Middleton, James, 119–30, 141Midewiwin, 158, 183mirrors. See micaMoorehead Circle. See Fort AncientMoorehead, Warren K., 26, 28, 82Morning Star, 252, 254, 258mortuary treatments: bundling, 6, 171, 197, 202, 212–16, 218; charring, 176; crema-tion, 6, 9, 170–71, 173, 176–77, 180, 203; inhumation, 41, 176–82, 185–86Mound 25. See Hopewell Mound GroupMound City Group (Ohio), 7, 91–92, 135, 137, 141, 176, 235–37, 239–41, 244, 248–51, 254, 257; Mound 8 pipe cache, 256Mount Logan, 135, 138, 142, 144, 151Mourning/World Renewal Mortuary model, 200, 213mtDNA, 216–17Mt. Horeb Earthworks (Kentucky), 2Muller, Jon, 234–35, 254, 257Newark Earthworks, 2, 117–50; Cherry Valley Oval, 121, 123–24, 141; Great Circle (Fairgrounds Circle), 29, 120, 122–25; Observatory Circle, 102, 119–25, 127, 130; Octagon Earthwork, 29, 119–25, 127, 129, 136; Salisbury Square, 120–21; Wright Square, 120–25, 145–47New Castle site (Indiana), 2, 4, 9–13, 20–21 Newlove Group (Ohio), 12North Fork (Ohio). See Paint Creekobsidian, 82, 84–86, 169, 181Octagon Earthwork. See Newark Earthworks268 IndexOhio Valley, 1–2, 9, 20, 79, 101, 197; Central Ohio River Valley (CORV), 239, 242–43, 246, 249, 253Old Town Earthworks. See Frankfort EarthworksPaint Creek (Ohio), 58, 71, 80–81, 85, 117–118, 126, 131, 141–45, 148, 154, 156–58, 160, 164, 171, 176–78, 181, 221; North Fork, 80–81, 85, 156–58, 160, 164Pete Klunk site (Illinois), 216Picture Cave (Missouri), 234, 236, 249, 255, 258pipe (platform), 6–7, 9, 22, 236–50, 256Plains, The (Ohio), 2, 22 platform pipe. See pipe (platform)Porter Mounds. See Frankfort EarthworksPortsmouth Group, 2, 22post circle. See woodhengePoverty Point, 101, 104, 106Pricer Mound (Seip–Pricer Mound). See Seip Earthworksprojectile points: Cresap, 17, 20; Snyders, 7, 17, 20Prufer, Olaf, 83quartered circle, 98, 106–7; cross-in-circle motif, 235, 254, 258quartz, 84–85, 178, 180Queen Mound (Florida), 236, 249Raccoon Creek (Ohio), 117Rattlesnake Knob (Ohio), 135, 137–41, 144–47Renewal Lodge. See charnel facilitiesRio Grande Valley (New Mexico), 107ritual (ceremony): diversity in, 155, 161–63; Cherokee Foundation of Life Ceremony, 163–64, 167, 171, 187; Feast of the Dead, 165–67, 170, 187; non-mortuary deposits, 83, 162, 176, 221, 227–28; rite of reincorpo-ration, 166; rites of passage: 104, 106, 162, 166, 178, 184, 196–97; rite of separation (funeral), 166, 196–97; ritual prerogative, 214; ritual usufruct copyright, 214; spirit release rite, 197. See also termination rites; World Renewal ritesRiverbank site (Ohio; 33Ro1059), 85Rogan Copper Plates (Etowah, Georgia), 250–51Romain, William, 30–31, 102, 118, 125Ross Township No. 1 Earthwork (Ohio), 28Ruby, Bret J., 30–31, 207Sacred Circles, 101–2Sacred Games Tournées, 211–12, 215–18Salisbury Square. See Newark EarthworksScioto Hopewell, 92, 131; community organization, 156–61; soul concepts, 154–87Scioto River (Ohio), 80–81, 117–18, 132–41, 147, 236–38, 244–45Seal Township Works (Ohio), 2, 22, 29, 91, 102Seeman, Mark, 84Seip Earthworks, 29, 31, 34, 50–78, 84, 87, 91, 103, 141–45, 157–61, 172, 176, 221–30; Seip-Conjoined Mound (Conjoined Mound), 54, 62–65, 67, 72, 160; Seip-Pricer Mound (Pricer Mound), 160–62, 167, 169, 173, 177, 186Seip-Conjoined Mound (Conjoined Mound). See Seip EarthworksSeip-Pricer Mound (Pricer Mound). See Seip Earthworksshamanic practices, 155, 163–64, 168–69, 176–77, 181, 187, 209, 213–15, 234 Sharon Valley (Ohio), 141Shriver Circle (Ohio), 28, 92, 151silver, 178, 184sodality, 161–62, 169, 198–218soul concepts, 154–94; body soul, 166–67, 174; dual personal and living soul, belief in, 198–200; free soul, 166–67, 174; living soul, 197; multiple souls, 183, personal soul, 197; Soul Keepers, 212, 216, 218Spiro Mound (Oklahoma), 236, 252. See also Wehrle copper platesSpruce Hill Works (Ohio), 53, 135–44, 161Square Ground. See Big HouseSquircle. See earthwork formSteel Group (Ohio), 2, 22–23, 80Sterling Pipestone Quarry, 236, 246stomp ground. See Big HouseIndex 269Stonehenge and Avebury (United Kingdom), 51–52strontium-isotope analysis, 216–17Stubbs Earthwork (Ohio): Great Post Circle, 29, 31, 34, 102Sun Dance, 101; Sun Dance Lodge, 105Surfer (software), 4sweat lodge, 106swirl-cross, 238, 243, 246–48, 252TAG (Topography, Astronomy, and Geometry) Hypothesis, 118–19, 131, 143–45, 150. See also alignmentTeays Valley, 131, 137termination rites, 45, 101, 168, 187; by mantling, 103–4, 161, 226–28territorialism: inclusive, 206; exclusive, 206–10Tremper Mound (Ohio), 5, 170–71, 235–37, 239–40, 244, 249–50, 256–57; Great Cache, 170Turner Earthworks (Ohio), 236, 247–48, 257–58Utica Mounds (Illinois), 216Wehrle copper plates (Spiro site, Okla-homa), 252Weymouth, John, 87White River (Indiana), 4, 12, 17William Reynolds Enclosure. See Fort HillWilliams Cemetery (Ohio), 171Wilson Mounds (Illinois), 236, 238, 249–50, 257woodhenge (post circle), 20, 29–31, 34, 48, 54–55, 66–70, 72–73, 79–80, 101–6, 222; paired post circles, 104Works East Earthworks(Ohio), 29, 127, 130, 132–38, 141, 145, 151, 157–58, 161World Center Shrine, 80, 106–7World Heritage List, 50–53 World Renewal rites, 86, 104, 106, 155, 196–201, 204–5, 211–13; and postmortem human sacrifice, 211. See also ritual (ceremony)Wright Square. See Newark EarthworksEditorsBrian G. Redmond is Curator and John Otis Hower Chair of Archaeology at the Cleve-land Museum of Natural History. He received a PhD in Anthropology from Indiana Uni-versity and conducted field research at numerous Precontact Native American sites in the lower Ohio Valley and Lake Erie region. His major research interests include pottery analysis, Paleoindian bone modification, the development of settled village life and com-munity organization, and Woodland ceremonialism in the lower Great Lakes region.Bret J. Ruby holds a PhD from Indiana University and is a National Park Service archae-ologist at Hopewell Culture National Historical Park. He has a keen interest in the ancient and modern histories of American Indian peoples. His primary research interests focus on Hopewellian ritual landscapes, community organization, earthwork construction, and interregional interaction.Jarrod Burks is the Director of Archaeological Geophysics at Ohio Valley Archaeology, Inc., a cultural resource management firm in Columbus, Ohio. He also is president of Heartland Earthworks Conservancy, an organization working to study and save Ohio earthworks. In addition to his earthwork research, Jarrod codirects a long-term Hopewell settlement research project with Drs. Paul Pacheco (SUNY Geneseo) and DeeAnne Wymer (Bloomsburg University) that has intensively investigated several Ohio Hopewell settlements.

Vol. 1 Ch. a Index

https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=encountering_hopewell

Vol. 1 Ch. a Index

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

The University of Akron