Scarlatinal arthritis: a clinical and statistical study

Abstract

It is one of the compensations of work in a fever¡ hospital, that, although dealing with a comparatively limited number of diseases, in addition to various conditions which may be beset by an infectious disease, the scope of our observations in the field of medicine is considerably widened by the incidence of the complications which are a more or less constant feature of the exanthems and the other infectious fevers. Scarlet fever provides a rich selection of such complications and of these none is more interesting than Scarlatinal rheumatism or arthritis. This complication has an interest for its own sake in view of the marked attention paid at the present day to the generals question of rheumatism, and the prevention of heart disease associated therewith. From another point of view even the most modern and complete text -books show a certain amount of divergency of opinion in regard to certain clinical points that could be fairly easily cleared up by a little careful observation, and certain gaps in know - ledge, especially from the statistical standpoint, that could be filled in after a little consideration of the abundant records available in the Edinburgh City Hospital. The writer also originally set out with the intention of completing the work by making some bacteriological researches into the condition, but this was prevented by various circumstances, the main difficulty being that it was almost impossible to carry out this part of the work when not actually resident in the hospital. Most modern fever experts have adopted the term "arthritis" in place of the old "rheumatism's and although this may have something to commend it from a scientific point of view, in so far as the modern term denotes a certain condition in certain tissues, the old term had its conveniences, for it could be held to include associated inflammations in tendon sheaths and muscular tissues as well as in joints - so obviously manifestations of the same process that the new habit of separating them into arthritis, tondo-synovitis, and myositis, seems clumsy by comparison. Reference to this point is rendered necessary by the fact that in all statistical considerations the use of the term arthritis is held to include these other manifestations as well

    Similar works