It is common to estimate black hole abundances by using a measured
correlation between black hole mass and another more easily measured observable
such as the velocity dispersion or luminosity of the surrounding bulge. The
correlation is used to transform the distribution of the observable into an
estimate of the distribution of black hole masses. However, different
observables provide different estimates: the Mbh-sigma relation predicts fewer
massive black holes than does the Mbh-L relation. This is because the sigma-L
relation in black hole samples currently available is inconsistent with that in
the SDSS sample, from which the distributions of L or sigma are based: the
black hole samples have smaller L for a given sigma or have larger sigma for a
given L. This is true whether L is estimated in the optical or in the NIR. If
this is a selection rather than physical effect, then the Mbh-sigma and Mbh-L
relations currently in the literature are also biased from their true values.
We provide a framework for describing the effect of this bias. We then combine
it with a model of the bias to make an estimate of the true intrinsic
relations. While we do not claim to have understood the source of the bias, our
simple model is able to reproduce the observed trends. If we have correctly
modeled the selection effect, then our analysis suggests that the bias in the
relation is likely to be small, whereas the relation is
biased towards predicting more massive black holes for a given luminosity. In
addition, it is likely that the Mbh-L relation is entirely a consequence of
more fundamental relations between Mbh and sigma, and between sigma and L. The
intrinsic relation we find suggests that at fixed luminosity, older galaxies
tend to host more massive black holes.Comment: 12 pages, 7 figures. Accepted by ApJ. We have added a figure showing
that a similar bias is also seen in the K-band. A new appendix describes the
BH samples as well as the fits used in the main tex