Bandholm, Thomas Quaade

Clausen, Mikkel Bek

Grønlykke, Thor Buch

Kersting, Uwe Gustav

Lysdal, Filip Gertz

Nielsen, Theodor Ken

Petersen, Kasper

Thorborg, Kristian

Østergaard, Steffen Bunjko

English

Ankle sprain injuries account for up to 30% of all sport-related injuries80-90% are of a lateral nature caused by a sudden excessiveinversion of the footAnkle sprains are extremely common in indoor sportsAthletes with a previous ankle sprain are 4.9 to 8.2 times more likely to sustain another ankle sprain injuryCurrent best practice prescribes a combined use of an externalmeasure and neuromuscular training for 1-2 year

    Aalborg UniversitetRoutine Use and Satisfaction of Measures for the Prevention of Ankle Sprain Injuries inIndoor SportsØstergaard, Steffen Bunjko; Nielsen, Theodor Ken; Petersen, Kasper; Grønlykke, Thor Buch;Kersting, Uwe Gustav; Clausen, Mikkel Bek; Bandholm, Thomas Quaade; Thorborg, Kristian;Lysdal, Filip GertzPublication date:2019Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of recordLink to publication from Aalborg UniversityCitation for published version (APA):Østergaard, S. B., Nielsen, T. K., Petersen, K., Grønlykke, T. B., Kersting, U. G., Clausen, M. B., Bandholm, T.Q., Thorborg, K., & Lysdal, F. G. (2019). Routine Use and Satisfaction of Measures for the Prevention of AnkleSprain Injuries in Indoor Sports. Poster presented at 15th Scandinavian Congress on Medicine and Science inSports, Copenhagen, Denmark.General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright ownersand it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.            ? Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.            ? You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain            ? You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ?Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at vbn@aub.aau.dk providing details, and we will remove access tothe work immediately and investigate your claim.Downloaded from vbn.aau.dk on: November 25, 2020Routine Use and Satisfaction of Measures for the Prevention of Ankle Sprain Injuries in Indoor SportsSteffen Bunjko Østergaard1, Theodor Ken Nielsen1, Kasper Petersen1, Thor Buch Grønlykke2, Uwe Kersting1,3, Mikkel Bek Clausen4,6, Thomas Bandholm5, Kristian Thorborg4,5 & Filip Gertz Lysdal1,21HST, Aalborg University (Denmark), 2Spraino ApS (Denmark), 3German Sport University Cologne (Germany) 4SORC-C, Amager-Hvidovre Hospital (Denmark), 5PMR-C, Amager-Hvidovre Hospital (Denmark), 6University College Copenhagen (Denmark)INTRODUCTION• Ankle sprain injuries account for up to 30% of all sport-related injuries[1]• 80-90% are of a lateral nature caused by a sudden excessive inversion of the foot[2]• Ankle sprains are extremely common in indoor sports[1,3]• Athletes with a previous ankle sprain are 4.9[3] to 8.2[4] times more likely to sustain another ankle sprain injury• Current best practice prescribes a combined use of an external measure and neuromuscular training for 1-2 years[5]REFERENCES & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS[1] Fong DT, Hong Y, Chan L, et al. A Systematic Review on Ankle Injury and Ankle Sprain in Sports. Sports Med 2007;37:73-94[2] Khor YP, Tan KJ. The Anatomic Pattern of Injuries in Acute Inversion Ankle Sprains. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2013;1[3] McKay GD, Goldie PA, Payne WR, et al. Ankle injuries in basketball: injury rate and risk factors. Br. J. Sports Med. 2001;35:103-108[4] Pourkazemi, Fereshteh, et al. Predictors of recurrent sprains after an index lateral ankle sprain: a longitudinal study. Physiotherapy, 2018, 104.4: 430-437.[5] Verhagen, E. A. L. M, Bay K. Optimising ankle sprain prevention: a critical review and practical appraisal of the literature. Br. J. Sports Med. 2010;44:1082-1088OBJECTIVESTo identify the use of, and satisfaction with, measures for preventing ankle sprain injuries in indoor sportsCONCLUSIONS• Almost all players (90.7%) have used a measure to prevent ankle sprains• Players were most satisfied with rigid braces• Players do not follow current best practiceMETHODS• 398 Players with a recent ankle sprain• Handball, Basketball and Badminton• Elite/sub-elite level (league, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd division)• Questionnaire regarding use of and satisfaction with preventive measures• Sports tape• Kinesio tape• Rigid brace• Support bandage• Neuromuscular training• Level of satisfaction rated using a Likert scale• Differences analyzed using a Mixed-design analysis of varianceRESULTS• 90.7% of all players have used at least one preventive measure since their most recent ankle sprain • 77.6% have used sports tape• 14.3% have combined neuromuscular training with rigid bracing and/or sports tape• Rigid bracing was superior in adherence (56.1% continued use)• Players were significantly more satisfied with:• Rigid bracing vs. any other preventive measure (P < 0.001)• Neuromuscular training vs. Kinesio tape (P < 0.001) • Neuromuscular training vs. support bandage (P < 0.001)• Sports tape vs. Kinesio tape (P = 0.003)• 72.8% with a very recent ankle sprain (≤ 3 months) had stopped using preventive measures• “I did not feel the need anymore”12345Sports tape Kinesio tape SupportbandageRigid brace NeuromusculartrainingSATISFACTION

Routine Use and Satisfaction of Measures for the Prevention of Ankle Sprain Injuries in Indoor Sports

https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/files/318800672/_stergaard_2019_1.1.pdf

Routine Use and Satisfaction of Measures for the Prevention of Ankle Sprain Injuries in Indoor Sports

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

VBN