Abstract

We compare the rise times of nearby and distant Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) as a test for evolution using 73 high-redshift spectroscopically-confirmed SNe Ia from the first two years of the five year Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS) and published observations of nearby SN. Because of the ``rolling'' search nature of the SNLS, our measurement is approximately 6 times more precise than previous studies, allowing for a more sensitive test of evolution between nearby and distant supernovae. Adopting a simple t2t^2 early-time model (as in previous studies), we find that the rest-frame BB rise times for a fiducial SN Ia at high and low redshift are consistent, with values 19.100.17+0.18(stat)±0.2(syst)19.10^{+0.18}_{-0.17}({stat}) \pm 0.2 ({syst}) and 19.580.19+0.2219.58^{+0.22}_{-0.19} days, respectively; the statistical significance of this difference is only 1.4 \sg . The errors represent the uncertainty in the mean rather than any variation between individual SN. We also compare subsets of our high-redshift data set based on decline rate, host galaxy star formation rate, and redshift, finding no substantive evidence for any subsample dependence.Comment: Accepted for publication in AJ; minor changes (spelling and grammatical) to conform with published versio

    Similar works