CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Pharmacovigilance in hospice/palliative care: Net effect of haloperidol for delirium
Authors
GB Crawford
DC Currow
+7 more
M Doogue
C Litster
M Meera Agar
N Michael
J Phillips
SJ Quinn
D Rowett
Publication date
1 January 2013
Publisher
'Mary Ann Liebert Inc'
Doi
Cite
View
on
PubMed
Abstract
Introduction: Prescribing practice in hospice/palliative care is largely extrapolated from other areas of clinical practice, with few studies of net medication effects (benefits and harms) in hospice/palliative care to guide prescribing decisions. Hospice/palliative care patients differ in multiple ways from better studied participant groups, hence the applicability of studies in other participant groups is uncertain. Haloperidol, a butyrophenone derivative and dopamine antagonist, is commonly prescribed for nausea, vomiting, and delirium in hospice/palliative care. Its frequent use in delirium occurs despite little evidence of the effect of antipsychotics on the untreated course of delirium. The aim of this study was to examine the immediate and short-term clinical benefits and harms of haloperidol for delirium in hospice/palliative care patients. Method: A consecutive cohort of participants from 14 centers across four countries who had haloperidol commenced for delirium were recruited. Data were collected at three time points: baseline, 48 hours (clinical benefits), and day 10 (clinical harms). Investigators were also able to report clinical harms at any time up to 14 days after it was commenced. Results: Of the 119 participants included, the average dose was 2.1 mg per 24 hours; 42 of 106 (35.2%) reported benefit at 48 hours. Harm was reported in 14 of 119 (12%) at 10 days, the most frequent being somnolence (n=11) and urinary retention (n=6). Seven participants had their medication ceased due to harms (2 for somnolence and 2 for rigidity). Approximately half (55/119) were still being treated with haloperidol after 10 days. Conclusion: Overall, 1 in 3 participants gained net clinical benefit at 10 days. © Copyright 2013, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2013
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Adelaide Research & Scholarship
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:digital.library.adelaide.e...
Last time updated on 25/02/2014
University of Queensland eSpace
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:espace.library.uq.edu.au:U...
Last time updated on 01/01/2018
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1089%2Fjpm.2013.02...
Last time updated on 25/03/2019
ResearchOnline@ND (University of Notre Dame)
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:researchonline.nd.edu.au:n...
Last time updated on 17/11/2016
OPUS - University of Technology Sydney
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:opus.lib.uts.edu.au:10453/...
Last time updated on 13/02/2017