Despite great advances in our understanding of the formation of the Solar
System, the evolution of the Earth, and the chemical basis for life, we are not
much closer than the ancient Greeks to an answer of whether life has arisen and
persisted on any other planet. The origin of life as a planetary phenomenon
will probably resist successful explanation as long as we lack an early record
of its evolution and additional examples. It is widely thought that the
geologic record shows that life emerged quickly after the end of prolonged
bombardment of the Earth. New data and simulations contradict that view and
suggest that more than half a billion years of unrecorded Earth history may
have elapsed between the origin of life and LUCA. The impact-driven exchange of
material between the inner planets may have allowed earliest life to be more
cosmopolitan. Indeed, terrestrial life may not have originated on the Earth, or
even on any planet. Smaller bodies, e.g. the parent bodies of primitive
meteorites, offer alternative environments for the origin of life in our Solar
System. The search for past or present life on Mars is an obvious path to
greater enlightenment. The subsurface oceans of some icy satellites of the
outer planets represent the best locales to search for an independent origin of
life in the Solar System because of the high dynamical barriers for transfer,
intense radiation at their surfaces, and thick ice crusts. The ``ultimate''
answer to the abundance of life in the Cosmos will remain the domain of
speculation until we develop observatories capable of detecting habitable
planets - and signs of life - around the nearest million or so stars.Comment: Protostars and Planets V Conference, Hawai