Alford, Ross A.

Brunner, Jesse L.

Cashins, Scott D.

Collins, James P.

Greer, Amy L.

Johnson, Rebecca A.

Picco, Angela M.

Schock, Danna M.

Skerratt, Lee F.

English

ResearchOnline at James Cook University

ARTICLES Herpe/o[ogical Re"icw, 2009, 40(2), 145-/47. © 2009 by Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Guidelines for the Safe Use of Disposable Gloves with Amphibian Larvae in Light of Pathogens and Possible Toxic Effects AMY L. GREER* Child Health Evaluative Sciences The Research Institute oJthe HospitalJor Sick Children, 123 Edward Street Suite 420, Toronto, ON M5G 1E2, Canada e-mail: amy.greer@sickkids.ca DANNA M. SCHOCK Faculty oJ Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary Calgary, AB, T2N 4Nl, Canada JESSE L. BRUNNER State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse, New York 13210, USA REBECCAA.JOHNSON Detroit Zoological Society, Royal Oak, Michigan 48067, USA ANGELA M. PICCO United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, California 95825, USA SCOTT D. CASHINS School of Marine and Tropical Biology and Amphibian Disease Ecology Group James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia and School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences and Amphibian Disease Ecology Group James Cook University, lk>wnsville 4811, Australia ROSS A. ALFORD School of Marine and Tropical Biology and Amphibian Disease Ecology Group James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia LEE F. SKERRATT School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences and Amphibian Disease Ecology Group James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia and JAMES P. COLLINS School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University Tempe, AriZona 85287-4501, USA Prior to the discovery and widespread recognition that pathogens such as Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd.) and ranaviruses can lead to the decline and even extinction of amphibian populations around the world, few herpetologists used gloves when handling amphibians. Disposable gloves, along with disinfection protocols (Webb et al. 2007), quarantine (Young et al. 2007), and reports by Daszak et al. (2001) and Lynch (2001) have since become an important tool in our arsenal for preventing the spread of pathogens between individuals and among populations or habitats. Cashins et al. (2008) recently reported that latex, vinyl, and nitrile gloves can be lethal to tadpoles of several species (Litoria genimaculata, L. nannotis, and Buio marinus), even after short-term exposures during routine handling. Two previous studies had also found that latex and nitrile gloves (or water in which gloves had been soaked) could be lethal to Xenopus laevis and Rana tem· poraria tadpoles (Sobotka and Rahwan 1994, Gutleb et al. 2001). In an unrelated study aimed at developing hygiene protocols to prevent the spread of Bd among animals, Mendez et al. (2008) reported that bare hands that are washed between animals may be :; w co z Herpetological Review 40(2), 2009 145 146 o '" '" z preferable to repeatedly using the same pair of gloves in some situations. Although both Mendez et al. (2008) and Cashins et al. (2008) conclude that using new pairs of gloves for each handled animal is important for preventing the inadvertent transmission of pathogens, we have become aware that some organizations and researchers are interpreting these studies as cause, or even justification, for not using gloves. We wish to emphasize that discontinuing glove use may unnecessarily lead to increased spread of harmful pathogens. Although these studies indicate limitations and potential pitfalls of disposable gloves, their safe use remains an essential component of amphibian care and research. A variety of dis-posable gloves have been used extensively in the handling and care of larval amphibians in laboratory experiments (Table 1), in the field (Table 2), and in zoo settings (Table 3) without any adverse effects under conditions where morbidity or mortality would have been noticed. Additional examples documenting the non-injurious use of gloves appear in Cashins et al. (2008). These results make it clear that many glove types do not nega-tively affect many species of amphibian larvae. Given that the use of a new pair of gloves to handle each individual is a good method for preventing the transmission of pathogens, best practice should clearly be to handle larval amphibians using a new pair of gloves for each individual, of a type known to have no negative effects on that species. This can easily be done by initially determining which species are susceptible to which types or brands (or even batches) of gloves. Researchers can take a few simple steps to ensure that the gloves they use are not toxic to the amphibians they handle. We recommend a two-phase approach. If researchers have been handling larvae with disposable gloves in captivity or in a situation where individual larvae have been observed for 24 hours following contact and no adverse effects have been seen. then researchers should continue using those same gloves. However, they should remain vigilant for any unusual mortality by following the second phase of the following protocol. First, researchers should conduct a simple experiment in which tadpoles or salamander larvae of a given species arc handled using the gloves in question and then observed for 24 h for signs of morbidity Or mOltality. Sample sizes do not need to be especially large. Cashins et al. (2008) found that when gloves are toxic, <: 40% of the individuals were affected. Using 10% as a more conservative figure for the maximum number of individuals that may experience negative effects, a sample size of 29 provides a 95% probability of observing at least onc morbid or dead animal if the gloves under examination have deleterious effects on the species being tested. For rare and endangered species, replicate individuals could be handled and observed sequentially so that individuals are not unnecessarily killed; a single death would suggest a problem with the gloves. It is important that each animal be handled with new gloves and housed in a separate container so that individuals are independ-ent replicates. Note that plastic containers can leach bioactive contaminants (McDonald 2008), so it is worth scrutinizing containers too. Researchers should also use controls, in this case individuals handled with clean bare hands or with gloves that have been demonstrated to be safe with the species in question. Since there is no way to predict a priori which species will be affected Herpetological Review 40(2), 2009 by which gloves, this experiment should be conducted with every species to be handled using each type (e.g., latex, nitrile, or vinyl) and brand of glove that will be used. If it is impossible to hold individuals of a given species for 24 h, a sister species may be used. Given the potential for batch-to-batch variation in the manufacturing process, it may be preferable to order large batches of gloves after finding one that does not seem to cause mortality. Second, once a suitable type and brand of glove are identified, experiments should be used intermittently to test new batches of these gloves for safety. As confidence in the safety and quality control of the product is established then the testing could be less frequent. There are several other simple steps that researchers should take to minimize the risk to amphibians. Cashins et a!. (2008) found that rinsing vinyl gloves in water reduced their toxicity, so any protocol should include rinsing gloves in fresh water prior to handling animals. The water used for this purpose could be collected on site but should be discarded terrestrially. We also recommend researchers pay attention to where gloves are stored to avoid unnec-essary risks of gloves coming within close proximity of volatile toxic substances. While we cannot control how and where gloves are stored before we receive them, we can avoid storing them near disinfectants, insecticides, or laboratory chemicals. Lastly, we as a community should watch for and report morbidity and mortality associated with handling tadpoles and larvae in the lab or field. These findings should be openly shared with others who work on amphibians in order to avoid unnecessary morbidity and mortality. Disposable gloves are an essential component of any animal hygiene protocol and by taking these simple steps researchers can ensure that they help, rather than harm, the animals we study. LITERATURE CiTED TABLE 3. Amphibian species at the Detroit Zoo that have been repeatedly han-dled using gloved hands and otherwise exposed to gloves during husbandry and veterinalY care while in the larvallifestage. All animals are checked daily as part of routine care and hUSbandry. For several years, powdered latex gloves have been primarily used although infrequently non-powdered nitrile gloves are used. In no instance has glove-related morbidity or mortality as described by Cashins et al. (2008) ever been detected. Reference for all information in Table 3 is R. Johnson and D. Schock, personal observations. Species Origin I N' Puerto Rican Crested Toad (Bufo lemur) CAPT-DZ TENS Wyoming Toad (Bufo baxteri) CAPT-DZ TENS Panamanian Golden Frog (Atelopus varius zeteki) CAPT-DZ TENS Vietnamese Mossy Frog (Theloderma corticale) CAPT-DZ TENS Hourglass Treefrog (Hyla ebraccata) CAPT-DZ TENS Red-eyed Treefrog (Agalychnis callidryas) CAPT-DZ TENS African Clawed Frog (Xenopus laevis) CAPT-DZ TENS Golfodulcean Dart Frog (Phyllobates vittatus) CAPT-DZ ONES Green and Black Dart Frog (Dendrobates auratus) CAPT-DZ ONES Blue Dart Frog (Dendrobates azureus) CAPT-DZ ONES Emperor Newt (Tylototrition shanjing) CAPT-DZ TENS Anderson's Newt (Echinotrition andersoni) CAPT-DZ TENS Axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) CAPT-DZ TENS Marbled Salamander (Ambystoma opacum) CAPT-DZ TENS Texas Blind Salamander (Eurycea rathbuni) CAPT-DZ TENS Texas Salamander (Eurycea neotenes) CAPT-DZ TENS Red-spotted Newt (Notophthalmus v. viridescens) CAPT-DZ TENS 'CAPT~DZ = captive bred at the Detroit Zoo 2Dependent upon the breeding biology of the species. TENS = lO's to 100's of tadpoles surviving through metamOIphosis and beyond per breeding event for multiple years, ONES = 1-2 eggs laid per animal's breeding event with several adults producing tadpoles that survive beyond metamorphosis for multiple years. icity assays with tadpoles. Environ. Toxico!. Pharmacol. 10:119-121. BRUNNER, J. L., K. RICHARDS, AND 1. P. COLLINS. 2005. Dose and host characteristics influence virulence of ranavirus infections. Oecologia 144:399-406. LYNCH, M. 2001. Amphibian quarantine protocols Melbourne Zoo. At-tachment 6.In R. Speare and Steering Committee of Getting the Jump on Amphibian Disease. Developing management strategies to control amphibian diseases: Decreasing the risks due to communicable diseases, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville. 2001: 157-161.Available for download at: http://www.jell. edu.au/sehooliphtmIPHTM/frogs/adms/attach6.pdf. CASHINS, S. D.,R. A.ALFORD, AND L. F. SKERRATI. 2008. Lethal effects ofla-tex, nitrile, and vinyl gloves on tadpoles. Herpeto!. Rev. 39:298-301. DASZAK P., A. A. CUNNINGHAM, AND A. D. HYATI. 2001. Draft guidelines for international translocation of amphibians with respect to infectious diseases. Attachment 6. In R. Speare and Steering Committee of Getting the Jump on Amphibian Disease. Developing management strategies to control amphibian diseases: Decreasing the risks due to communicable diseases. School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville. 2001:150-156. Available for download at: http://www.jeu.edu.au/sehool/phtmIPHTM/frogs/adms/attach6.pdf. GREER,A. L., M. BERRILL, AND P. J. WILSON. 2005. Five amphibian mortal-ity events associated with ranavirus infection in south central Ontario, Canada. Dis. Aquat. Org. 67:9-14. --, C J. BRIGGS, AND J. P. COLLINS. 2008. Testing a key assumption of host-pathogen theory: Density and disease transmission. Oikos 117:1667-1673. --,J. L BRUNNER, AND J. P. COLLINS. 2009. Spatial and temporal patterns of Ambystoma tigrinum virus (ATV) prevalance in tiger salamanders, Ambytoma tirgrinum nebulosum. Dis. Aquat. Org. 85: 1-6. GUTLEB,A. C, M. BRONKHORsT,J. H. J. VAN DEN BERG,ANDA. J. MURK. 2001. Latex laboratory-gloves: An unexpected pitfall in amphibians tox-McDONALD, G, R.,A. L. HUDSON, S. M. J. DUNN, ET At. 2008. Bioactive contaminants leach from disposable laboratory plasticware. Science 322:917. MENDEZ, D., R. WEBB, L. BERGER, AND R. SPEARE. 2008. Survival of the amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis on bare hands and gloves: Hygiene implications for amphibian handling. Dis. Aquat. Org. 83:97-104. SOBOTKA, J. M., AND R. G. RAHWAN. 1994. Lethal effect of latex gloves on Xenopus laevis tadpoles. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 32:59. WEBB, R., D. MENDEZ, L. BERGER, AND R. SPEARE. 2007. Additional disinfectants effective against the amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Dis. Aquat. Org. 74:13-16. YOUNG, S., L. BERGER, AND R. SPEARE. 2007. Amphibian chytridiomy-cosis: Strategies for captive management and conservation. Int. Zoo. Yearbook 41: I-II. Herpetological Review 40(2), 2009 147 

Guidelines for the safe use of disposable gloves with amphibian larvae in light of pathogens and possible toxic effects

https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/10603/1/10603_Greer_et_al_2009.pdf

Guidelines for the safe use of disposable gloves with amphibian larvae in light of pathogens and possible toxic effects

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

ResearchOnline at James Cook University