Garibaldi, A

Gilardi, G

Gullino, Ml

Pintore, I

English

Institutional Research Information System University of Turin

Short CommuniCationOCCURENCE OF FUSARIUM EQUISETI AS A CONTAMINANT  OF DIPLOTAXIS TENUIFOLIA SEEDSG. Gilardi1, I. Pintore1, M.L. Gullino1, 2 and A. Garibaldi11 AGROINNOVA, Centre of Competence for the Innovation in the Agro-Environmental Sector,  University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy2 DI.S.A.F.A., Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences and Technologies,  University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), ItalySUMMARYFusarium equiseti, the causal agent of leaf spot of both wild [Diplotaxis tenuifolia (L.) DC] and cultivated [Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav.] rocket, is a new pathogen on these crops, which has increasingly been found on several com-mercial farms in Italy. In order to investigate the possible transmission of this pathogen through infested seeds, both wild and cultivated rocket seeds, from eight commercially available seed lots, have been collected from four farms suffering from severe field losses. F. equiseti was identified through morphological observations and molecular analy-sis based on the elongation factor 1 alpha gene (EF-1α). Four out of six seed lot samples of wild rocket were found to be contaminated, while the pathogen was not isolated from the two tested seed lots of E. vesicaria. The high-est level of detected infestation was 5 out of 800 non-dis-infected Diplotaxis sp. seeds. F. equiseti was not isolated from disinfected seeds. Nine of eleven isolates of F. equi-seti obtained from seeds were pathogenic on wild rocket. This work demonstrates that F. equiseti can be transmit-ted by Diplotaxis tenuifolia seeds. The external nature of seed contamination of Diplotaxis sp. by F. equiseti has been proved. More extensive essays on seed lots of cultivated rocket are needed in order to have a better understanding of the seed transmissibility of the pathogen on such a host.Keywords: seed-borne pathogens, leaf spot, seed health, leafy vegetables.Wild [Diplotaxis tenuifolia (L.) DC] and cultivated [Eruca vesicaria (L.)Cav.] rocket are increasingly grown in many countries, because of their extensive use as salad and/or as a garnish. In Italy, these leafy vegetables are cul-tivated in intensive cropping systems in open fields and under greenhouses over an area of approximately 3,600 hectares, with up to five successive crops per year on the same soil. Moreover, rocket seed production in Italy covers an area of about 500 hectares (Anonymous, 2012, 2014).In recent years, several diseases caused by soil-borne and foliar pathogens have been observed for the first time on wild and cultivated rocket in Italy (Gilardi et al., 2013; Garibaldi et al., 2015). Many of these diseases have been shown to be seed-borne, and their transmission through infected seeds has been demonstrated (Gullino et al., 2014; Gilardi et al., 2015).The leaf spot of wild and cultivated rocket, caused by Fusarium equiseti, is an increasingly important disease that affects many production areas in both Southern and Northern Italy. Yield losses of about 10% have been ob-served at temperatures between 15 and 28°C and under high relative humidity (Garibaldi et al., 2011, 2015). Black-brown and greasy lesions with a well-defined border, sur-rounded by a violet-brown halo, have been observed on plants at the cotyledon stage and after 20 to 25 days from sowing. The same pathogen is associated with leaf spot, root and crown rot and fruit rot, which result in seed de-cay and seedling infection on different crops, such as cere-als, ginseng, cumin, hibiscus, cyperus, corn, watermelon and aleppo pine (Adams et al., 1987; Rai, 1979; Reuveni, 1982; Correll et al., 1991; Kosiak et al., 2003; Goswami et al., 2008; Punja et al., 2008; Hassan et al., 2014; Gupta et al., 2013; Lazreg et al., 2014; Li et al., 2014, 2015). Such a broad host range increases the risk caused by the recent introduction of F. equiseti into Italy. Its sudden appearance in different cultivation areas could be explained due to its spread through contaminated seeds.In order to investigate the possible contamination of commercial seed lots of wild and cultivated rocket, a seed test was conducted on two seed samples of E. sativa and six of Diplotaxis spp. collected from commercial farms in Journal of Plant Pathology (2017), 99 (1), 245-248  245 Edizioni ETS Pisa, 2017Corresponding author: G. Gilardi Fax: +39.011.67098540 E-mail: giovanna.gilardi@unito.it246 Wild rocket seeds contaminated by F. equiseti Journal of Plant Pathology (2017), 99 (1), 245-248Veneto, Piedmont, Lombardy and Campania that have suf-fered severe losses in the field.Eight seed lots (Table 1) were assayed for the presence of F. equiseti on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA, Merck, Ger-many), amended with 25 mg l−1 of streptomycin sulphate, as described by Mathur and Kongsdal (2003). Isolations were carried out on seeds that had only been washed in distilled water (not disinfected) or disinfected by soak-ing for 1 min in 1% sodium hypochloride, rinsed in ster-ile distilled water and dried on filter paper. Fifteen seeds were placed in each Petri plate, which was then sealed with parafilm and incubated at 25°C for a 12 h photope-riod for 7 days. The Petri plates were checked regularly for the development of fungal orange-brown colonies, with the typical morphological characteristics of F. equiseti (Leslie and Summerell, 2006). Any suspected colony of F. equiseti was purified, subcultured on PDA as a single-spore culture, coded and stored at 4°C. Genomic DNA of the isolates obtained from the seeds was extracted from a pure culture of selected isolates grown on PDA in order to confirm the morphological identification. After 7 days of incubation, macroconidia and microconidia of F. equi-seti were produced in abundance on the PDA cultures and were accompanied by the presence of chlamydo-spores produced in chains. Four out of six wild rocket seed-lots were contaminated by the pathogen. A total of 11 isolates were obtained from the 6, 400 non-disinfected seeds (Tables 2 and 3), with infected seed percentage rang-ing from 0.125 (1 isolate out of 800 seeds) to 0.625% (5 isolates out of 800 seeds). Amplification of the elongation factor 1 alpha gene (EF-1α) was carried out for five isolates coded Rs1Feq, Rs5Feq, Rs6Feq, Rs7Feq and Rs9Feq with EF1/EF2 primers (O’Donnell et al., 1998) and deposited at GenBank with accession Nos. KX272609, KX272610, KX272613, KX272611, KX272612. BLAST analysis on EF 1-α sequences from all of the isolates showed a homol-ogy of 98 to 100% with the Fusariun incarnatum - equiseti species complex (FIESC). F. equiseti was not isolated from the tested lots of disinfected seeds.The pathogenicity of the 11 isolates obtained from the seeds was tested on 30-day-old wild rocket plants, trans-planted into 2-l pots, filled with a steamed peat substrate and maintained/kept in a greenhouse at 24-27°C. Four pots/treatment with 5 plants/pot were used. The artificial inoculation with the pathogen was carried out by spraying leaves with a spore suspension of 5 × 104 conidia/ml (1 ml per pot) prepared from 15-day-old cultures of each isolate on PDA. One strain of Fusarium equiseti obtained from infected leaves of wild rocket (coded Feq1/14, GenBank Accession No. KM583445) was used as a reference. Plants maintained in the same conditions, sprayed with distilled water, served as healthy controls. The inoculated plants showed the typical symptoms caused by the pathogen 7-10 days after the artificial inoculation, while the non-inocu-lated plants stayed healthy. The plants were checked for disease development, and the percentage of infected leaves and affected leaf area was evaluated 21 days after the arti-ficial inoculation (Table 3). The data were statistically pro-cessed by means of variance analysis, that is, by ANOVA and the Tukey test (p < 0.05). F. equiseti was consistently re-isolated from the affected leaves. The virulence of the F. equiseti isolates from the seeds was similar to that of F. equiseti isolated from symptomatic leaves of D. tenuifolia, and ranged from 38.7% to 61.3% of affected leaves with 5.1 to 30.6% of affected leaf area. Two out of nine isolates from the seeds were not pathogenic (Table 3).F. equiseti is a member of the FIESC, a genetically high-ly diverse group, with 30 phylogenetically distinct species (O’ Donnell et al., 2009, 2012), divided into two clades designated as F. incarnatum and F. equiseti (Castella and Cabañes, 2014). Differences in pathogenicity among the tested isolates obtained from wild rocket seeds observed in the present study could be correlated with phyloge-netic species known within the FIESC, as reported also in other pathosystem (Castella and Cabañes, 2014; Villani et al., 2016).The external nature of seed contamination of Diplotaxis sp. by F. equiseti has been proved in the present study. This result is in agreement with similar results pertain-ing to other plant species, such as cowpea (Aigbe et al., 1999), ginseng (Punja et al., 2008) and Carya illinoinen-sis (Lazarotto et al., 2014). The pathogen was not isolated from seeds of two tested seed lot samples of E. vesicaria. Other assessments should be made in which the evaluation should be extended to new seed lots of cultivated rocket. The occurrence of F. equiseti on wild rocket seeds repre-sents a potential source of inoculum, and favours the long distance spread of the pathogen. Alternaria sp. was also constantly isolated from the rocket seeds, thus confirm-ing that the quick spread of this pathogen in Italy and in Table 1. List of the samples of seed lots tested for the presence of Fusarium equiseti.Host Cultivar Seed lot Seed company Harvesting Year Origin of the sampleEruca vesicaria Rucola coltivata 1 La Semiorto, Sarno, (Salerno), Italy 2014 PiedmontE. vesicaria Rucola coltivata 2 Franchi Sementi, Grassobbio (Bergamo), Italy 2015 PiedmontD. tenuifolia Extrema 3 Ortis, Cesena (Forlì-Cesena), Italy 2015 VenetoDiplotaxis tenuifolia Summer 4 Orosem, Azzano, San Paolo (Bergamo), Italy 2014 LombardyD. tenuifolia Luna 5 T&T Vegetable seeds, Chioggia (Venezia), Italy 2014 VenetoD. tenuifolia Giove 6 T&T Vegetable seeds, Chioggia (Venezia), Italy 2014 VenetoD. muralis Rucola selvatica 7 Suba seed, Longiano (Forlì-Cesena), Italy 2014 CampaniaD. muralis Rucola selvatica 8 Suba seed, Longiano (Forlì-Cesena), Italy 2015 CampaniaJournal of Plant Pathology (2017), 99 (1), 245-248 Gilardi et al. 247other countries could, at least partially, be explained by the use of contaminated seeds (Tidwell et al., 2014; Gilardi et al., 2015). Previous studies provided evidence that Plec-tosphaerella cucumerina, a pathogen of wild rocket that has frequently been detected on several farms that grow this crop for the ready to eat sector, is also a seed contaminant (Gilardi et al., 2013).Owing to the extensive host range of F. equiseti and the economic value of rocket, this pathogen could also be a threat to this crop in other production areas, and the present results suggests that seeds may be important in disseminating different pathogens. Considering the ex-ternal nature of the contamination of wild rocket seeds a conventional treatment of the seeds might eliminate the risk of infection in contrast with a more problematic en-dophytic contamination.Identifying the primary source of inoculum is of critical importance for an effective disease management. Quick and reliable diagnostic tools and seed dressing methods need to be investigated and made available to seed compa-nies and growers. Among the tested fungicides, benomyl, thiophanate-methyl, propiconazole and fludioxonil have been shown to be able to reduce the mycelial growth of F. equiseti from ginseng in vitro at 10 mg/l, while fludioxonil is already effective at 1 mg/l (Punja et al., 2008). Informa-tion regarding the chemical management of this pathogen is very scarce, especially in relation to the very limited availability of registered fungicides for rocket.Moreover, disease management should rely above all on preventative methods, such as early diagnosis of the pathogen and seed dressing.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe research leading to these results has received fund-ing from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 634179 “Effective Management of Pests and Harmful Alien Spe-cies - Integrated Solutions” (EMPHASIS). The authors thank Dr. Marguerite Jones for language revision. The tech-nical support of Giuseppe Ortu is kindly acknowledged.REFERENCESAdams Jr. G.C., Gubler W.D., Grogan R.G., 1987. Seedling dis-eases of muskmelon and mixed melons in California caused by Fusarium equiseti. Plant Disease 71: 370-374.Aigbe S.O., Fawole B., Berner D.K., 1999. Cowpea seed rot disease caused by Fusarium equiseti identified in Nigeria. Plant Disease 83: 964.Table 2. Number of Fusarium equiseti colonies detected on the tested wild and cultivated rocket seed lot samples.Host and Cultivar Seed lotTotal number of isolates on 800 seeds/sampleNon-disinfected (Isolate code) DisinfectedE. sativa cv. Rucola coltivata 1 0 0E. sativa cv. Rucola coltivata 2 0 0Diplotaxis sp. cv. Extrema 3 0 0Diplotaxis sp. cv. Summer 4 3(Rs1Feq; Rs2Feq;Rs3Feq) 0Diplotaxis sp. cv. Luna 5 1(Rs5Feq) 0Diplotaxis sp. cv. Giove 6 0 0Diplotaxis sp. cv. Rucola Selvatica 7 5(Rs4Feq; Rs6Feq RS7Feq; RS8Feq;Rs10Feq) 0Diplotaxis sp. cv. Rucola Selvatica 8 2 (Rs9Feq; Rs11Feq) 0Total 11 out of 6,400 0 out of 6,400Table 3. Pathogenicity of different isolates of Fusarium equiseti obtained from wild rocket seeds, 21 days after the artificial inocu-lation, evaluated under growth chamber conditions at 25°C. Isolate code Obtained from Infected leaves [%] Affected leaf area [%]Feq 1-14 Infected wild rocket leaves 46.7 ±1.3 ba 23.3 ±1.2 bc Rs1Feq Non-disinfected seed 46.7 ±9.6 b 22.9 ±6.5 bcRs2Feq Non-disinfected seed 41.3 ±3.5 b 14.0 ±3.1 a-cRs3Feq Non-disinfected seed 0.0 ±0.0 a 0.0 ±0.0 aRs4Feq Non-disinfected seed 38.7 ±7.1 b 19.2 ±4.7 a-cRs5Feq Non-disinfected seed 42.7 ±5.8 b 17.1 ±2.8 a-cRs6Feq Non-disinfected seed 60.0 ±4.0 b 29.9 ±6.8 cRs7Feq Non-disinfected seed 41.3 ±3.5 b 5.1 ±1.4 abRs8Feq Non-disinfected seed 53.3 ±5.8 b 18.1 ±4.1 a-cRs9Feq Non-disinfected seed 61.3 ±4.8 b 30.6 ±5.2 cRs10Feq Non-disinfected seed 0.0 ±0.0 a 0.0 ±0.0 aRs11Feq Non-disinfected seed 44.0 ±10.6 b 13.7 ±6.0 a-cNon inoculated control − 0.0 ±0.0 a 0.0 ±0.0 a aMeans in the same column, followed by the same letter, do not differ significantly according to Tukey’s test (P < 0.05).248 Wild rocket seeds contaminated by F. equiseti Journal of Plant Pathology (2017), 99 (1), 245-248Anonymous, 2012. Italy rocket exports valued at 30-40 million Euro. News article. Fresh Plaza: http://www.freshplaza.com/article/98430.Anonymous, 2014. Indagine superfici sementi da orto, cam-pagna 2014 Assosementi. http://www.sementi.it/statis-tiche/377/indagine-moltiplicazione-orticola-campagna-2014, 15 March 2015.Castellá G., Cabañes F.J., 2014. Phylogenetic diversity of Fu-sarium incarnatum-equiseti species complex isolated from Spanish wheat. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 106: 309-317.Correll J.C., Mitchel J.K., Andersen C.R., 1991. Fruit rot of pumpkin in Arkansas caused by Fusarium equiseti. Plant Dis-ease 75: 751.Garibaldi A., Gilardi G., Bertoldo C., Gullino M.L., 2011. First report of leaf spot of Rocket (Eruca sativa) caused by Fusar-ium equiseti in Italy. Plant Disease 95: 1315.Garibaldi A., Gilardi G., Ortu G., Gullino M.L., 2015. First report of leaf spot of Wild Rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia) caused by Fusarium equiseti in Italy. Plant Disease 99: 1183.Gilardi G., Gullino M.L., Garibaldi A., 2013. New diseases of wild and cultivated rocket in Italy. Acta Horticolturae 1005: 569-572.Gilardi G., Demarchi S., Ortu G., Gullino M.L., Garibaldi A., 2015. Occurrence of Alternaria japonica on seeds of wild and cultivated rocket. Journal of Phytopathology 163: 419-422.Goswami R.S., Dong Y., Punja Z.K., 2008. Host range and my-cotoxin production by Fusarium equiseti isolates originating from ginseng fields. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 30: 155-160.Gullino M.L., Gilardi G., Garibaldi A., 2014. Seed-borne pathogens of leafy vegetable crops. In: Gullino M.L., Munkvold G. (eds). Global Perspectives on the Health of Seeds and Plant Propagation Material, pp. 47-58. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Gupta V., Razdan V.K., John D., Sharma B.C., 2013. First report of leaf blight of Cyperus iria caused by Fusarium equiseti in India. Plant Disease 97: 838.Hassan N., Shimizu M., Hyakumachi M., 2014. Occurrence of root rot and vascular wilt diseases in roselle (Hibiscus sab-dariffa L.) in Upper Egypt. Mycobiology 42: 66-72.Kosiak E.B., Holst-Jensen A., Rundberget T., Jaen M.T.G., Torp M., 2003. Morphological, chemical and molecular differen-tiation of Fusarium equiseti isolated from Norwegian cereals. International Journal Food Microbiology 99: 195-206.Lazarotto M., Muniz M.F.B., dos Santos R.F., Blume E., Hara-kawa R., Hamann F.A., 2014. First report of Fusarium equi-seti associated on pecan (Carya illinoinensis) seeds in Brazil. Plant Disease 98: 847.Lazreg F., Belabid L., Sanchez J., Gallego E., Garrido-Cardenas J.A., Elhaitoum A., 2014. First report of Fusarium equiseti causing damping-off disease on Aleppo pine in Algeria. Plant Disease 98: 1268.Leslie J.F., Summerell B.A., 2006. The Fusarium Laboratory Manual. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, Iowa, 388 pages.Li P.P., Cao Z.Y., Wang K., Zhai H., Jia H., Liu N., Li S.H., Hao Z.M., Gu S.Q., Dong J.G., 2014. First report of Fusarium equi-seti causing a sheath rot of corn in China. Plant Disease 98: 998.Li Y., Ji, P., 2015. First report of fruit rot of watermelon caused by Fusarium equiseti in Georgia in the United States. Plant Disease 99: 1272-1273.Mathur S.B., Kongsdal O., 2003. Common laboratory seed health testing methods for detecting fungi (1st, revised ed.). Ch-Switzerland: International Seed Testing Association.O’Donnell K., Kistler H.C., Cigelnik E., Ploetz R.C., 1998. Multiple evolutionary origins of the fungus causing Panama disease of banana: concordant evidence from nuclear and mitochondrial gene genealogies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 2044-2449.O’Donnell K., Sutton D.A., Rinaldi M.G., Gueidan C., Crous P.W., Geiser D.M., 2009. A novel multi-locus sequence typ-ing scheme reveals high genetic diversity of human patho-genic members of the Fusarium incarnatum-F. equiseti and F. chlamydosporum species complexes within the U.S. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 47: 3851-3861.O’Donnell K., Humber R.A., Geiser D.M., Kang S., Park B., Robert V.A., Crous P.W., Johnston P.R., Aoki T., Rooney A.P., Rehner S.A., 2012. Phylogenetic diversity of insectico-lous fusaria inferred from multilocus DNA sequence data and their molecular identification via FUSARIUM-ID and FUSARIUM MLST. Mycologia 104: 427e445.Punja Z.K., Wan A., Rahman M., Goswami R.S., Barasubiye T., Seifert K.A., Lévesque C.A., 2008. Growth, population dy-namics, and diversity of Fusarium equiseti in ginseng fields. European Journal of Plant Pathology 121: 173-184.Rai R.P., 1979. Fusarium equiseti (Corda) Sacc. causing dry rot of potato tubers – New report. Current Science 48: 1043-1045.Reuveni R., 1982. Fusarium equiseti – A new cause of cumin spice plant wilt in Israel. Plant Disease 66: 498-49.Tidwell T.E, Blomquist C.L. Rooney-Latham S., Scheck H.J., 2014. Leaf spot of Arugula, caused by Alternaria japonica, in California. Plant Disease 98: 1272.Villani A., Moretti A., De Saeger S., Han Z., Di Mavungu J.D., Soares C.M.G., Proctor R.H., Venâncio A., Lima N., Stea G., Paciolla C., Logrieco A.F., Susca A., 2016. A polyphasic ap-proach for characterization of a collection of cereal isolates of the Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti species complex. Inter-national Journal of Food Microbiology 234: 24-35.Received October 18, 2016 Accepted January 3, 2017

OCCURENCE OF FUSARIUM EQUISETI AS A CONTAMINANT OF DIPLOTAXIS TENUIFOLIA SEEDS

https://iris.unito.it/bitstream/2318/1664968/2/fusarium%20equiseti%20rocket%20seeds.pdf

OCCURENCE OF FUSARIUM EQUISETI AS A CONTAMINANT OF DIPLOTAXIS TENUIFOLIA SEEDS

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Institutional Research Information System University of Turin