The issue of birth control has been a constant source of dissent between the Catholic Church and the secular world for much of history. However, the past year has seen an even more divisive conflict erupt over family planning in the United States, since the Affordable Care Act mandates that employers supply insurance coverage for birth control (Reuters, 2013). By contrast, China’s government continues to dictate how many children each family can have. The current political and social climate of the world has seriously called into question what should be proper family planning. For the Christian, this is extremely important, as the family unit is emphasized in Scripture. In this paper, I will argue that a Christian view of family planning sees children as gifts, not as unfortunate by-products of sex, and is needed to serve God well in one’s duty to his family

Newcomer, Elise

English

Digital Commons

CedarEthics: A Journal of CriticalThinking in BioethicsVolume 13Number 1 2013 Article 1December 2013To Conceive or Not Conceive: A ChristianPerspective on Family PlanningElise Newcomerenewcomer@cedarville.eduDigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, whichmeans that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication.However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journalsdo not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville,the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solelyresponsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to dc@cedarville.edu.Recommended CitationNewcomer, Elise (2013) "To Conceive or Not Conceive: A Christian Perspective on Family Planning," CedarEthics: A Journal ofCritical Thinking in Bioethics: Vol. 13 : No. 1 , Article 1.DOI: 10.15385/jce.2013.13.1.1Available at: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/cedarethics/vol13/iss1/1To Conceive or Not Conceive: A Christian Perspective on FamilyPlanningBrowse the contents of this issue of CedarEthics: A Journal of Critical Thinking in Bioethics.AbstractThe issue of birth control has been a constant source of dissent between the Catholic Church and the secularworld for much of history. However, the past year has seen an even more divisive conflict erupt over familyplanning in the United States, since the Affordable Care Act mandates that employers supply insurancecoverage for birth control (Reuters, 2013). By contrast, China’s government continues to dictate how manychildren each family can have. The current political and social climate of the world has seriously called intoquestion what should be proper family planning. For the Christian, this is extremely important, as the familyunit is emphasized in Scripture. In this paper, I will argue that a Christian view of family planning sees childrenas gifts, not as unfortunate by-products of sex, and is needed to serve God well in one’s duty to his family.KeywordsFamily planning, Christian perspectiveCreative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0License.Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/cedarethicsPart of the Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, and the Family, Life Course, and Society CommonsThis article is available in CedarEthics: A Journal of Critical Thinking in Bioethics: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/cedarethics/vol13/iss1/1CedarEthics ⦁ 2013 ⦁ Volume 13 ⦁ Number 1  1  CedarEthics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1-4. ISSN 2333-9713 © 2013, Elise Newcomer, licensed under CC BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) To Conceive or Not Conceive: A Christian Perspective on Family Planning  Elise Newcomer Cedarville University  he issue of birth control has been a constant source of dissent between the Catholic Church and the secular world for much of history. However, the past year has seen an even more divisive conflict erupt over family planning in the United States, since the Affordable Care Act mandates that employers supply insurance coverage for birth control (Reuters, 2013). By contrast, China’s government continues to dictate how many children each family can have. The current political and social climate of the world has seriously called into question what should be proper family planning. For the Christian, this is extremely important, as the family unit is emphasized in Scripture. In this paper, I will argue that a Christian view of family planning sees children as gifts, not as unfortunate by-products of sex, and is needed to serve God well in one’s duty to his family.  Before discussing the specifics of responsible family planning, we should understand the need for it. 1 Timothy 5:8 says, “But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever” (ESV). Scripture is clear that family is important and that we have a great responsibility to take care of family members.  The Bible also specifically extols the value of children. “Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward” (Psalm 127:3). Children should be highly valued, and should be seen as gifts to us. Seeing children as just the by-products of sex is very detrimental and violates the spirit of such biblical texts.  With all this in mind, it is also crucial to see that truly caring for a child means making wise decisions so that one has the means, including emotional investment, financial resources, and time, to give good care. This may mean that a couple limits the number of children they have in order to best provide for each child’s emotional, physical, and spiritual needs.  Of course, God is the ultimate Master; He can choose to bring a life into the world anytime He chooses, even if it defies human wisdom. It appears, however, that God has granted parents the responsibility for family planning. He has commanded His people, particularly in the books of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes, to make wise decisions, and this extends to building a family (Campbell, 1960). So we must decide what responsible family decision-making looks like.  The issue of birth control is controversial, inasmuch as hormonal methods might seem to deviate from the created plan as described in Scripture. The Catholic Church only condones natural family planning (NFP). Church father St. Augustine believed that sexuality is a sin and is only permitted for procreation (Campbell, 1960). However, we see in Scripture that there are more God-given purposes for sexual intimacy within a married couple than just T 2 Newcomer ⦁ To Conceive or Not Conceive procreation. Song of Solomon demonstrates this principle, as there are countless references to the unitive aspect of sex, with arguably little or no mention of the procreative aspect . For example, 4:9-11 says, “You have captivated my heart, my sister, my bride; you have captivated my heart with one glance of your eyes, with one jewel of your necklace. How beautiful is your love, my sister, my bride! How much better is your love than wine, and the fragrance of your oils than any spice! Your lips drip nectar, my bride; honey and milk are under your tongue; the fragrance of your garments is like the fragrance of Lebanon.” This is one example of the goodness and joy of sexual intimacy between a man and his wife on its own merits. Such intimacy stands on its own in marriage, and is not merely for producing children.  Just as childbearing is not the only purpose for sex, having children is not the defining feature of a marriage. God commands his people to “Be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:28), and procreation is an important part of humans’ mandate. However, “the idea that Christian hope is in eternal life rather than in many generations of their own genetic offspring is crucial. A marriage without children is already a true marriage because of the God-given nature of the covenant relationship” (Blanchard, 2007, p. 237).  Consider the couple who cannot have children because pregnancy would be too dangerous to the woman’s health. Since they cannot procreate, should they also never have sex? Are they inferior to other married couples who have children? From Song of Solomon and other Scriptures, we can conclude otherwise. According to theologian Karl Barth, being childless can also be a sort of calling that can allow a couple to be effective for the Kingdom in a special way that parents cannot (Blanchard, 2007). Marriage is an institution that honors God even apart from procreation.  So, if procreation is not the central purpose of marriage, then we must consider what kind of birth control may be used ethically. The Catholic Church only condones NFP, which determines when the woman is fertile based on her menstrual cycle and does not use any artificial methods to prevent pregnancy. This is a legitimate option for many couples, as abundant research supports its effectiveness.  However, some couples may choose artificial methods of birth control, such as barrier or certain hormonal methods. Since these two methods are not abortive, they should not be ethically forbidden for all Christians. The Catholic Church only permits NFP because it does not completely block the procreative aspect of sex. However, since the whole purpose of NFP is to purposefully avoid pregnancy, I see little difference between that and other methods. As discussed earlier, if a couple chooses to employ a contraceptive, they should still maintain the proper attitude about conceiving; that is, they should not view an unexpected baby as a problem but as an unplanned gift. Non-abortifacient contraceptives should be allowed if the couple chooses to use them in order to fulfill their duty to their family, and to fulfill a different role within the Kingdom. (Mayo Clinic Staff, 2011; Sullivan, 2006; Warniment, 2012).  I would like to make two final comments here on choosing birth control methods. The first is that this decision, in my estimation, may be a situation similar to that which Romans 14 CedarEthics ⦁ 2013 ⦁ Volume 13 ⦁ Number 1  3  discusses. “The faith that you have, keep between yourself and God. Blessed is the one who has no reason to pass judgment on himself for what he approves. But whoever has doubts is condemned if he eats, because the eating is not from faith. For whatever does not proceed from faith is sin” (Romans 14:22-23). This passage refers to eating meat sacrificed to idols, an obstacle to some but not to others; however, it may apply also to birth control. Even if non- abortifacient contraceptives are permissible, which I argue here that they are, a couple may still choose to use NFP because of their own convictions. This seems right to me.  My second comment is about who should and should not make these decisions. Family planning should be left up to Christian parents, as they seek the Lord’s guidance in making the decision. It is wrong, therefore, for government entities, employers, or any others to dictate the number of children a couple may have. The parents have the primary responsibility in bringing up children, and neither the government nor any other party should have any say.  In conclusion, parents have a great responsibility in their decision-making about raining a family. There are a variety of views and approaches, from the Catholic Church’s condemnation of contraceptives to China’s government regulations on family size. I believe that from Scripture and other sources, we see that sex and marriage do not exist merely for procreation, and that the decision to use non-abortive birth control should be left up to the parents, who should be seeking the Lord’s guidance and wisdom, and a desire to honor Him above all.   References  Blanchard, K. (2007). The gift of contraception: Calvin, Barth, and a lost Protestant conversation. Journal of The Society of Christian Ethics, 27(1), 225-249.  Campbell, F. (1960). Birth Control and the Christian Churches. Population Studies, 14(2), 131-147.  Mayo Clinic Staff (2011). Rhythm method for natural family planning. Mayo Clinic. Retrieved from http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/rhythm- method/MY01003/DSECTION=risks  Mohler, R. (2013). Can Christians Use Birth Control? Journal for Biblical Manhood & Womanhood, 18(1), 7-9.  Reuters, T. (2013). Supreme Court is asked to review 'contraception mandate' ruling. NBC News Health. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/health/supreme-court-asked- review-contraception-mandate-ruling-4B11205668  Sullivan, D. M. (2006). The oral contraceptive as abortifacient: an analysis of the evidence. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 58(3), 189-195.   4 Newcomer ⦁ To Conceive or Not Conceive Warniment, C., & Hansen, K. (2012). Is natural family planning a highly effective method of birth control? Yes: natural family planning is highly effective and fulfilling. American Family Physician, 86(10), 1-2. 

To Conceive or Not Conceive: A Christian Perspective on Family Planning

Cedarville UniversityDigitalCommons@CedarvilleCedarEthics Online Center for BioethicsFall 2013To Conceive or Not Conceive: A ChristianPerspective on Family PlanningElise Newcomerenewcomer@cedarville.eduFollow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/cedar_ethics_onlinePart of the Bioethics and Medical Ethics CommonsThis Article is brought to you for free and open access byDigitalCommons@Cedarville, a service of the Centennial Library. It hasbeen accepted for inclusion in CedarEthics Online by an authorizedadministrator of DigitalCommons@Cedarville. For more information,please contact digitalcommons@cedarville.edu.Recommended CitationNewcomer, Elise, "To Conceive or Not Conceive: A Christian Perspective on Family Planning" (2013). CedarEthics Online. 51.http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/cedar_ethics_online/51To Conceive or Not Conceive: A Christian Perspective on Family Planning Elise Newcomer  The issue of birth control has been a constant source of dissent between the Catholic Church and the secular world for much of history. However, the past year has seen an even more divisive conflict erupt over family planning in the United States, since the Affordable Care Act mandates that employers supply insurance coverage for birth control (Reuters, 2013). By contrast, China’s government continues to dictate how many children each family can have. The current political and social climate of the world has seriously called into question what should be proper family planning. For the Christian, this is extremely important, as the family unit is emphasized in Scripture. In this paper, I will argue that a Christian view of family planning sees children as gifts, not as unfortunate by-products of sex, and is needed to serve God well in one’s duty to his family.   Before discussing the specifics of responsible family planning, we should understand the need for it. 1 Timothy 5:8 says, “But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever” (ESV). Scripture is clear that family is important and that we have a great responsibility to take care of family members.  The Bible also specifically extols the value of children. “Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward” (Psalm 127:3). Children should be highly valued, and should be seen as gifts to us. Seeing children as just the by-products of sex is very detrimental and violates the spirit of such biblical texts.  With all this in mind, it is also crucial to see that truly caring for a child means making wise decisions so that one has the means, including emotional investment, financial resources, A Christian Perspective on Family Planning  2  and time, to give good care. This may mean that a couple limits the number of children they have in order to best provide for each child’s emotional, physical, and spiritual needs.  Of course, God is the ultimate Master; He can choose to bring a life into the world anytime He chooses, even if it defies human wisdom. It appears, however, that God has granted parents the responsibility for family planning. He has commanded His people, particularly in the books of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes, to make wise decisions, and this extends to building a family (Campbell, 1960). So we must decide what responsible family decision-making looks like.  The issue of birth control is controversial, inasmuch as hormonal methods might seem to deviate from the created plan as described in Scripture. The Catholic Church only condones natural family planning (NFP). Church father St. Augustine believed that sexuality is a sin and is only permitted for procreation (Campbell, 1960). However, we see in Scripture that there are more God-given purposes for sexual intimacy within a married couple than just procreation. Song of Solomon demonstrates this principle, as there are countless references to the unitive aspect of sex, with arguably little or no mention of the procreative aspect. For example, 4:9-11 says, “You have captivated my heart, my sister, my bride; you have captivated my heart with one glance of your eyes, with one jewel of your necklace. How beautiful is your love, my sister, my bride! How much better is your love than wine, and the fragrance of your oils than any spice! Your lips drip nectar, my bride; honey and milk are under your tongue; the fragrance of your garments is like the fragrance of Lebanon.” This is one example of the goodness and joy of sexual intimacy between a man and his wife on its own merits. Such intimacy stands on its own in marriage, and is not merely for producing children. Just as childbearing is not the only purpose for sex, having children is not the defining feature of a marriage. God commands his people to “Be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:28), A Christian Perspective on Family Planning  3  and procreation is an important part of humans’ mandate. However, “the idea that Christian hope is in eternal life rather than in many generations of their own genetic offspring is crucial. A marriage without children is already a true marriage because of the God-given nature of the covenant relationship” (Blanchard, 2007, p. 237).  Consider the couple who cannot have children because pregnancy would be too dangerous to the woman’s health. Since they cannot procreate, should they also never have sex? Are they inferior to other married couples who have children? From Song of Solomon and other Scriptures, we can conclude otherwise. According to theologian Karl Barth, being childless can also be a sort of calling that can allow a couple to be effective for the Kingdom in a special way that parents cannot (Blanchard, 2007). Marriage is an institution that honors God even apart from procreation.   So, if procreation is not the central purpose of marriage, then we must consider what kind of birth control may be used ethically. The Catholic Church only condones NFP, which determines when the woman is fertile based on her menstrual cycle and does not use any artificial methods to prevent pregnancy. This is a legitimate option for many couples, as abundant research supports its effectiveness.  However, some couples may choose artificial methods of birth control, such as barrier or certain hormonal methods. Since these two methods are not abortive, they should not be ethically forbidden for all Christians. The Catholic Church only permits NFP because it does not completely block the procreative aspect of sex. However, since the whole purpose of NFP is to purposefully avoid pregnancy, I see little difference between that and other methods. As discussed earlier, if a couple chooses to employ a contraceptive, they should still maintain the proper attitude about conceiving; that is, they should not view an unexpected baby as a problem A Christian Perspective on Family Planning  4  but as an unplanned gift. Non-abortifacient contraceptives should be allowed if the couple chooses to use them in order to fulfill their duty to their family, and to fulfill a different role within the Kingdom. (Mayo Clinic Staff, 2011; Sullivan, 2006; Warniment, 2012).  I would like to make two final comments here on choosing birth control methods. The first is that this decision, in my estimation, may be a situation similar to that which Romans 14 discusses. “The faith that you have, keep between yourself and God. Blessed is the one who has no reason to pass judgment on himself for what he approves. But whoever has doubts is condemned if he eats, because the eating is not from faith. For whatever does not proceed from faith is sin” (Romans 14:22-23). This passage refers to eating meat sacrificed to idols, an obstacle to some but not to others; however, it may apply also to birth control. Even if non-abortifacient contraceptives are permissible, which I argue here that they are, a couple may still choose to use NFP because of their own convictions. This seems right to me.  My second comment is about who should and should not make these decisions. Family planning should be left up to Christian parents, as they seek the Lord’s guidance in making the decision. It is wrong, therefore, for government entities, employers, or any others to dictate the number of children a couple may have. The parents have the primary responsibility in bringing up children, and neither the government nor any other party should have any say. In conclusion, parents have a great responsibility in their decision-making about raining a family. There are a variety of views and approaches, from the Catholic Church’s condemnation of contraceptives to China’s government regulations on family size. I believe that from Scripture and other sources, we see that sex and marriage do not exist merely for procreation, and that the decision to use non-abortive birth control should be left up to the parents, who should be seeking the Lord’s guidance and wisdom, and a desire to honor Him above all. A Christian Perspective on Family Planning  5  References Blanchard, K. (2007). The gift of contraception: Calvin, Barth, and a lost Protestant conversation. Journal of The Society of Christian Ethics, 27(1), 225-249.  Campbell, F. (1960). Birth Control and the Christian Churches. Population Studies, 14(2), 131-147.  Mayo Clinic Staff (2011). Rhythm method for natural family planning. Mayo Clinic. Retrieved from http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/rhythm-method/MY01003/DSECTION=risks  Mohler, R. (2013). Can Christians Use Birth Control? Journal for Biblical Manhood & Womanhood, 18(1), 7-9.  Reuters, T. (2013). Supreme Court is asked to review 'contraception mandate' ruling. NBC News Health. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/health/supreme-court-asked-review-contraception-mandate-ruling-4B11205668  Sullivan, D. M. (2006). The oral contraceptive as abortifacient: an analysis of the evidence. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 58(3), 189-195.  Warniment, C., & Hansen, K. (2012). Is natural family planning a highly effective method of birth control? Yes: natural family planning is highly effective and fulfilling. American Family Physician, 86(10), 1-2.     

https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=cedarethics

To Conceive or Not Conceive: A Christian Perspective on Family Planning

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Digital Commons

Digital Commons