The main aim of ventilation is to guarantee a goodindoor air quality, related to the energy consumed forheating and fan(s). Active or passive heat recoverysystems seem to focus on the reduction of heatingconsumption at the expense of fan electricityconsumption and maintenance. In this study, demandcontrolledmechanical extract ventilation systems ofRenson (DCV1 and DCV2), based on natural supply inthe habitable rooms and mechanical extraction in thewet rooms (or even the bedrooms), was analysed forone year by means of multi-zone Contam simulationson a reference detached house and compared withstandard MEV and mechanical extract ventilationsystems with heat recovery (MVHR).
To this end, IAQ, total energy consumption,CO2 emissions and total cost of the systems aredetermined. The results show that DCV systems withincreased supply air flow rates or direct mechanicalextract from bedrooms can significantly improve IAQ,while reducing total energy consumption comparedto MEV. Applying DCV reduces primary heatingenergy consumption and yearly fan electricityconsumption at most by 65% to 50% compared toMEV. Total operational energy costs and CO2emissions of DCV are similar when compared toMVHR. Total costs of DCV systems over 15 years aresmaller when compared to MVHR due to lowerinvestment and maintenance costs
