A von Bertalanffy growth curve,
L = 65.47 cm (1 - e-.2005 (t + .4113 yr)),
is derived from published data on spotted seatrout in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and used in constructing a yield-per-recruit contour. Maximum yield-per-recruit is approached as F increases above 1 and age of first entry approaches 3.9 years (14.9 in., 1.1 lb). A linear regression is derived relating average size of capture to gill net mesh size (MS in inches),
L = 1.97 in. + 8.63 MS,
and used along with legal sizes of first harvest to evaluate the impact of current laws in the Gulf states on yield-per-recruit of spotted seatrout

Adkins, Gerald

Condrey, Richard E.

Wascom, Michael W.

English

Aquila Digital Community

Gulf Research ReportsVolume 8 | Issue 1January 1985Yield-Per-Recruit of Spotted SeatroutRichard E. CondreyLouisiana State UniversityGerald AdkinsLouisiana Department of Wildlife and FisheriesMichael W. WascomLouisiana State UniversityDOI: 10.18785/grr.0801.09Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/gcrPart of the Marine Biology CommonsThis Short Communication is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf andCaribbean Research by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact Joshua.Cromwell@usm.edu.Recommended CitationCondrey, R. E., G. Adkins and M. W. Wascom. 1985. Yield-Per-Recruit of Spotted Seatrout. Gulf Research Reports 8 (1): 63-67.Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr/vol8/iss1/9GulfResearch Reports, Vol. 8 ,  No. 1,63-67, 1985 15’ SHORT COMMUNICATIONS A -Stewart (19611 3 YIELD-PER-RECRUIT OF SPOTTED SEATROUT’ RICHARD E. CONDREY’ , GERALD ADKINS3 AND MICHAEL W. WASCOM2 ’Coastal Fisheries Institute, Center for Wetland Resources, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803-7503 ’Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Bourg, Louisiana 70343 ABSTRACT A von Bertalanffy growth curve, is derived from published data on spotted seatrout in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and used in constructing a yield-per-recruit contour. Maximum yield-per-recruit is approached as F increases above 1 and age of first entry approaches 3.9 years (14.9 in., 1.1 lb). A linear regression is derived relating average size of capture to gill net mesh size (MS in inches), L = 1.97 in. + 8.63 MS, and used along with legal sizes of first harvest to evaluate the impact of current laws in the Gulf states on yield-per-recruit of spotted seatrout. INTRODUCTION Spotted seatrout are one of the most important edible finfish in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Despite their pre- eminence, there is a perception that scientific “information [on seatrout] is general and, for the most part, inadequate” to meet management’s needs (Lori, and Perret 1980). Cur- rent regulations on the size at harvest are not based upon a quantitative consideration of yield-per-recruit and spawner- recruit relationships. Rather, current laws are largely based upon expedient compromises between conflicting user groups (Perret et al. 1980; Merriner 1980). In this note we present a yield-per-recruit analysis based entirely upon a synthesis of published data. While lacking the rigor of a study based upon its own data collection, this synthesis does offer a needed first look at the effect of cur- rent regulatory restrictions on the yield of this increasingly important resource. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Construction of the yield-per-recruit contour A von Bertalanffy growth curve, ‘This is contribution N o .  CFI-84-5, Coastal Fisheries Institute, Center for Wetland Resources, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803-7503. It results from research supported by the Louisiana Fisheries Initiative. Manuscript received October 23,1984;accepted May 18,1985. was fitted to size-at-age data (total length in cm) reported for seatrout in U S .  Gulf of Mexico estuaries (Pearson 1929, Klima and Tabb 1959, Moffett 1961, Stewart 1961, Tatum 1980, and Colura et al. 1984) (Figure 1). Mean annual air 50 45 40  0 E 23 35 I 30 z w -1 25 20 0 -Colura e l  at. (1984) 0 -Klima andTabb (1959) -MoIfett (1961. Fort ~ e y e r s l  A - Pearson (1929) 0 0 -MOffett  [1961,Cedar K e y  p 20 I 5  h i .- Y 10 5 Figure 1. Growth rate of spotted seatrout in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Tatum’s “Age I+ . . . Age VI+” data are plotted as age 2 through age 7 fish under the assumption that all of the annual growth had occurred when the length-age measurements were made. 63 64 C O N D R E Y  E T  A L .  3 4 5 6 7 I I I M temperature (1941-1970; NOAA 1981, 1983a, b) of the coastal weather station nearest to each study site was used as an index of mean annual water temperature (Table 1). The average of these means was used as an estimate of the overall mean water temperature for the entire data set. Use of the combined growth equation and overall mean temperature in Pauly’s (1979) equation generated an instan- taneous rate of natural mortality (M) of 0.45 on an annual basis. These rates of growth and mortality predict that maxi- mum biomass of an unfished cohort is attained at 3.9 yr (14.9 in., 1.1 lb). Tatum (1980) reports a total annual mortality of 50% (Z = ’ 0.69, where Z is the instantaneous annual rate of total mortality) for spotted seatrout in Alabama. An instan- taneous rate of annual fishing mortality (F) of 0.24 is estimated as the difference between Tatum’s Z and our M For comparison, we reran the natural mortality analysis using the individual estimates of growth and temperature. The predicted individual estimates of M ranged from 0.22 to 0.65 with a mode of 0.36 (Table 1). Maximum biomass of an unfished cohort was predicted to occur over a range of 3.4 yr (14.2 in., 1 .O lb) to 8.4 yr (24.4 in., 5.0 lb) with modes of 4.9 yr and 15.9 in. (1.3 lb) (Table 1). We are not able to correlate the variation between these individual estimates with location or timing of the studies. For example, estimates were comparable for central and south central Texas despite the wide temporal range of these reports, 1929 and 1984. In contrast, Moffett’s study generated two widely differing sets of estimates for north central and south central Florida. We assume that the real variation in growth rates which should occur as one moves from the southern to the northern estuaries of the US. Gulf of Mexico is not represented by the variation observed in these estimates. We use our combined equation as the best estimate of growth throughout the rest of this paper. Data on the average sizes of fishes (total length in inches) caught in differing size mesh (MS in inches) of monofila- ment and multifilament gill nets are plotted in Figure 2 (Trent and Pristas 1977, Matlock et al. 1978, Adkins et al. (F = Z - M = 0.69 - 0.45 = 0.24). -65 -60 - 55 - 50 h E -45 - 0 -40 - 35 - 30 1979, Lorio et al. 1980, Adkins and Bourgeois 1982, Arnoldi 1982). Analysis of covariance indicates no signifi- cant effect of mesh type (mono- or multifilament) on the relationships between sizes of fish and mesh, L = 1.97 in. t 8.63 MS (r2 = 0.90, H.S.). The minimum legal mesh sizes of gill nets in the various Gulf states (Table 2)  were used in this weighted regression to estimate average size at entry. 26 24 22 T c .- Y I 2o I- o J h 16 L 5 18 r 14 12 10 I I I I r - I  I I I I 1’,0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 MESH SIZE (in.) Figure 2. Relationship between mesh size of monofilament or multi- filament gill nets and average length of spotted seatrout captured. Data from Matlock et al. 1978 (M); Trent and Pristas 1977 (T); Adkins et al. 1979 (A); Lorio et al. 1980 (L); Adkins and Bourgeois 1982 (C, monofilament; g, multifilament); and Arnoldi 1982 (D). TABLE 1 Estimates of growth, mortality, and of age and size of maximum biomass predicted for an unfished cohort. Area of study Author L, k to Temp. M Age Length Wt. cm annual years OC annual years in. Ib Corpus Cristi, Texas Matagorda, Texas Coastal Alabama Apalachicola, Florida Cedar Key,  Florida Fort Meyers, Florida Flamingo, Florida Combined Pearson 1929 Colura et al. 1984 Tatum 1980 Klima and Tabb 1959 Moffett 1961 Moffett 1961 Stewart 1961 All of the above 71.4 ,148 72.6 .152 57.2 .362 78.4 .140 114.4 .085 62.6 .214 85.2 .138 65.5 .200 -0.640 -1.288 0.616 -0.456 -0.814 -0.343 -0.579 -0.411 22.2 21.4 19.8 20.3 22.0 23.3 25.0 22.0 .36 .36 .65 .32 .22 .49 .35 .45 4.9 4 .O 3.4 5.6 8.4 3.6 5.2 3.9 15.6 1.3 15.9 1.3 14.2 1.0 17.5 1.8 24.4 5.0 14.1 0.9 18.4 2.1 14.9 1.1 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 65 TABLE 2 Current size and gill net restrictions on the harvest of spotted seatrout in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Florida Alabama Mississippi Louisiana Texas Size limit Recreational Commercial 12 in. (but no size limit in Gulf and Franklin counties). 12 in. (but no size limit in Gulf and Franklin counties). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Gill net mesh size or general statutes (minimum) of local application or by rules of the Marine Fisheries Commission that are approved by the Governor and Cabinet. Varies by local statutes 12 in Currently prohibited. Formerly 12 in. Currently prohibited. Formerly 1.25 in. in Mobile County and 1.5 in. in Baldwin County. None 12 in. - - _ _ -. _ 1.5 in. None 12 in. - _ _ _ _ _  1.75 in.  14 in. Currently prohibited. Formerly 12 in. Currently prohibited. Formerly 1.5 in. Minimum Legal Age Minimum Gill at Legal Net First  Sizes Mesh Entry (in.) (in.> Cyrl 14 1; 1( C 0 0.5 1 .o 1.5 2.0 FISHING MORTALITY (F)  95 75 55 35 15 Figure 3. A yield-per-recruit contour for spotted seatrout in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Points indicate the entry levels associated with the current or recent Gulf state laws on minimum legal sizes of harvest and of gill net mesh (Table 2). 66 CONDREY ET AL.  Effect on yield-per-recruit A yield-per-recruit contour was computed with Ricker’s (1 975) expanded form of Beverton’s expression using these estimates, Harrington et al.’s (1979) length-weight relation- ship, and 12 years as an estimate of the maximum attainable age (Figure 3). Sizes of first entry as denoted by legal size limits (Table 2) and average size at entry predicted for gill net mesh limits are denoted for the respective states on the The fisheries of most concern are in Florida’s Gulf and Franklin counties and in Louisiana and Mississippi’s recrea- tional fisheries since these fisheries have no legal minimum limits on the size of first harvest. As such any growth-over- fishing concerns are superseded by the open nature of these fisheries since they are fully exposed to the potential for spawner-recruit overfishing. The situation in Louisiana’s commercial harvest has been greatly improved by two pieces of recent legislation (Ford 1984). The first reduced Louisiana’s gill net mesh from 2.0 in. to 1.75 in., moving the gill net fishery from fish averaging 19.2 in. (6.4 yr, 2.4 Ib) to those averaging 17.1 in. (5.0 yr, 1.7 lb). The second increased the minimum legal commercial harvest from 10 in. (2.0 yr, .33 lb) to 12 in. (2.7 yr, .57 lb). On the other hand, Alabama and, perhaps, Texas have recently moved away from maximum yield per recruit. In both states commercial harvest has been recently prohibited. Before the prohibition the existing regulations targeted the plot. commercial harvest towards the size of fish which would maximize yield: 3-4 years old, 12-15 in., and 0.6-1.1 lb. Given our current estimate of fishing mortality for Alabama, this prohibition will reduce the overall yield for that state, unless it stimulates an increase in the recreational fishery. A similar pattern might be expected for Texas, although the situation is less clear as we have no direct estimate of fish- ing mortality for that state. Since the spotted seatrout fishery has a large recreational component, management may be far more concerned with catch-per-angler-hour and spawner-recruit relationships than with yield-per-recruit. Our analysis suggests, however, that efforts to optimize catch-per-angler-hour and to maintain an adequate spawning biomass may be compatible with efforts to maximize yield-per-recruit. Yield appears to be maximized when spotted seatrout are harvested at 3.9 years. This age represents the second year of spawning activity. As such, management that provides for maximum yield- per-recruit, also reduces the danger of spawner-recruit overfishing (as compared to most current regulations), and enhances the recreational experience through the harvest of larger fish. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank the following reviewers for their suggestions: A. M. Bankston, V. Guillory, G. C. Matlock, M. D. Murphy, J. E. Roussel, B. Thompson, G. Waguespack and W. Wiseman. REFERENCES CITED Adkins, G.,  J .  Tarver, P. Bowman, & B. Savoie. 1979. A study of the commercial finfish in coastal Louisiana. Louisiana Dep. of Wild- life and Fisheries Tech. Bull. 29. New Orleans, Louisiana. Adkins, G .  & M. J .  Bourgeois. 1982. An evaluation of gill nets of various mesh sizes. Louisiana Dep. of Wildlife and Fisheries Tech. Bull. 36. New Orleans, Louisiana. Arnoldi, D. 1982. Certain aspects of the life history and habits of the spotted seatrout in Calcasieu Lake, Louisiana. Final report for Dingle Johnson Project Number F-32. Louisiana Dep. of Wildlife and Fisheries, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Colura, R. L., C. W. Porter, & A. F. Maciorowski. 1984. Preliminary evaluation of the scale method for describing age and growth of spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) in the Matagorda Bay System, Texas. Tex. Parks Wildl. Dep., Manage. Data Ser. No. 257. Austin, Texas. Ford, T. B.  1984. Governor’s Task Force on Saltwater Finfish Man- agement: Report to the Governor. Louisiana Dep. of Wildlife and Fisheries, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Harrington, R. A., G .  C. Matlock, & J. E. Weaver. 1979. Standard- total length, total length-whole weight, and dressed weight-whole weight relationships for selected species from Texas bays. Tex. Parks Wildl. Dep., Tech. Ser. No. 26. Austin, Texas. Klima, JZ. F., & D. C. Tabb. 1959. A contribution to the biology of the spotted weakfish, Cynoscion nebulosus (Cuvier), from nor thwes t  Florida, with a description of the fishery. Fla. Board Conserv. Mar. Res. Lab., Tech. Ser. 30. St. Petersburg, Florida. Lorio, W. 1. & W. S. Perret. 1980. Biology and ecology of spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus Cuvier). Pages 7-1 3 in: Proceed- ings of  the colloquim on the biology and management of red drum and spotted seatrout. Gulf States Marine Fisheries Com. mission, Ocean Springs, Mississippi. Lorio, W. J., T. Heaton, & 0. Dakin. 1980. The relative impact of netting and sport fishing on economically important estuarine species. Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium Final Report, MASGP-79-025, Ocean Springs, Mississippi. Matlock, G .  C . ,  J .  E. Weaver, & A. W. Green. 1978. Trends in finfish abundance in Texas estuariesas indicated by  gill nets. Texas Parks and Wildlife Dep., Coastal Fisheries Branch, Austin, Texas. Merriner, J .  V. 1980. History and management of the spotted sea- trout fishery. Pages 55-61 in: Proceedings of the colloquim on the biology and management of red drum and spotted seatrout. Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, Ocean Springs, Mississippi. Moffett, A. W. 1961. Movement and growth of spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus (Cuvier) in West Florida. Ha. Board Con- serv. Mar. Res. Lab., Tech. Ser. 36. 35 p p .  NOAA. 1981 I Climatological data: Annual summary, Florida 1980. 84(13):2-3. ____ . 1983a. Climatological data: Annual summary, Alabama 1982. 88(13): 1 1 .  ___.  1983b. Climatological data: A n n u a l  summary, Texas Pauly, G .  1979. On the interrelationship between natural mortality, growth parameters and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks. J. Cons. Int. I’Explor. Mer 39:175-192. 1982. 87(13):31-32. SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 67 Pearson, J. C. 1929. Natural history and conservation of the redfish and other commercial sciaenids on the Texas Coast. Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish. 44: 129 -2  14. Perret, W. S., J .  E. Weaver, R. 0. Williams, P. L. Johansen, T. D. McIlwain, R. C. Raulerson, & W. M. Tatum. 1980. Fishery profiles of red drum and spotted seatrout. Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, Ocean Springs, Mississippi. Ricker, W. E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Oln. 191: 251-259. Stewart, K. W. 1961. Contributions to the biology of the spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) in the Everglades National Park, Florida. Masters thesis, Univ. of Miami, Miami, Florida. Tatum, W. M. 1980. Spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) age and growth: data from annual fishing tournaments in coastal Alabama, 1964-1977. Pages 89-92 in: Proceedings of the colloquium on the biology and management of red drum and sported seatrouf. Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, Ocean Springs, Mississippi. Trent, L., & P. J .  Pristas. 1977. Selectivity of gill nets on estuarine and coastal fishes from St. Andrew Bay, Florida. Fish. Bull. 75: 185 -1 98. ADDENDUM (in proof) Since this paper was written, Mississippi and Florida have begun consideration of new regulations that would change the size restrictions in their states. In Mississippi it is probable that state regulations will be changed to make it illegal to sell, offer for sale, or transport for sale in or from the state of Mississippi, spotted seatrout under 14 in. In Florida it is possible that state regulations will be changed to make 14 in. the minimum size limit for spotted seatrout for both commercial and recreational fisheries. The Florida regulation might or might not be applied statewide. If applied statewide in Florida’s recreational and commercial fisheries and applied in Mississippi’s commercial fisheries, the 14 in. minimum limit would target the harvest towards the size of fish that would maximize yield-per-recruit in these fisheries. On the other hand, if part of Florida remains exempt from this regulation that part, a long with the recreational fisheries in Louisiana and Mississippi, will be fully exposed to  the threat of spawner-recruit overfishing. 

Yield-Per-Recruit of Spotted Seatrout

https://aquila.usm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1191&amp;context=gcr

Yield-Per-Recruit of Spotted Seatrout

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Aquila Digital Community