Comparison of Control of Clostridium difficile Infection in Six English Hospitals Using Whole-Genome Sequencing

Abstract

Background: Variation in Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) rates between healthcare institutions suggests overall incidence could be reduced if the lowest rates could be achieved more widely. Methods: We investigated whether whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of consecutive C. difficile isolates from six English hospitals over one year (2013-14) could be used to assess infection control performance. Fecal samples with a positive initial screen for C. difficile (GDH or toxin-PCR) were cultured and sequenced. Within each hospital, we estimated the proportion of cases plausibly acquired from previous cases, defined by an isolate ≤2 single nucleotide polymorphisms different from a previous isolate in the last 90-days. Results: 851/971(87.6%) sequenced culture-positive samples were toxigenic, and 451(46.4%) were fecal-toxin-positive. 128/652(20%,95%CI 17-23%) toxigenic isolates >90-days after the study started were genetically-linked to a prior patient’s isolate from the previous 90-days. Hospital-2 had the fewest linked isolates, 7/105(7%,3-13%), hospital-1 an intermediate proportion, 9/70(13%,6-23%), while hospitals 3-6 had similar proportions of linked isolates (22-26%) (p≤0.002 comparing hospital-2 vs 3-6). Results were similar adjusting for locally-circulating ribotypes. Adjusting for hospital, ribotype-027 had the highest proportion of linked isolates (57%, 95%CI 29-81%). Fecal-toxin-positive and toxin-negative patients were similarly infectious in terms of being a potential transmission donor, OR=1.01(0.68-1.49,p=0.97). There was no association between the estimated proportion of cases linked to a previous case within 90-days and testing rates (p=0.60). Conclusions: WGS can be used to identify varying rates of C. difficile transmission in different locations, and offers the potential to allow targeted efforts to reduce CDI incidence