CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Toxicological and ecotoxicological risk‐based prioritization of pharmaceuticals in the natural environment
Authors
Agerstrand
Ashton
+36 more
Boxall
Boxall
Capleton
Carter
Cooper
Crane
Dong
Drillia
Escher
Fick
Franco
Fu
Halling-Sorensen
Hirsch
Kidd
Kim
Kolpin
Kostich
Lahnsteiner
Laville
Monteiro
Niemuth
Ramirez
Roberts
Rocco
Roos
Sanderson
Santos
Schwab
Schwaiger
Sinclair
Triebskorn
Triebskorn
Wang
Webb
Zha
Publication date
22 January 2016
Publisher
'Wiley'
Doi
Abstract
Approximately 1500 active pharmaceutical ingredients are currently in use; however, the environmental occurrence and impacts of only a small proportion of these have been investigated. Recognizing that it would be impractical to monitor and assess all pharmaceuticals that are in use, several previous studies have proposed the use of prioritization approaches to identify substances of most concern so that resources can be focused on these. All of these previous approaches suffer from limitations. In the present study, the authors draw on experience from previous prioritization exercises and present a holistic approach for prioritizing pharmaceuticals in the environment in terms of risks to aquatic and soil organisms, avian and mammalian wildlife, and humans. The approach considers both apical ecotoxicological endpoints as well as potential nonapical effects related to the therapeutic mode of action. Application of the approach is illustrated for 146 active pharmaceuticals that are used either in the community or in hospital settings in the United Kingdom. Using the approach, 16 compounds were identified as a potential priority. These substances include compounds belonging to the antibiotic, antidepressant, anti‐inflammatory, antidiabetic, antiobesity, and estrogen classes as well as associated metabolites. In the future, the prioritization approach should be applied more broadly around the different regions of the world. Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;9999:1–10. © 2016 SETA
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1002%2Fetc.3319
Last time updated on 26/03/2019
White Rose Research Online
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:94...
Last time updated on 02/08/2016