Th e general idea of the article is to compare Deleuze’s theory of the institution, which emerges in the
context of various infl uences of French phenomenology and philosophy of law, with Searle’s theory
and the latest Anglo-Saxon theories of the institution, and the new institutionalism. Deleuze carelessly
diff erentiates infl uences and fragments copied or taken over from Hume, Saint-Just, de Sade,
Renard, Hauriou, Durkheim, Malinowski and others and in the end completely succeeds in relegating
to oblivion his ingenious project from 1953, Instincts and Institutions (Instincts et institutions). Th e
consequences of such writing and theoretical work call into question the status of the theory of the
institution and replace it with intuition and recognition that the thematisation of the institution is an
impossible task. Th us the author of the article attempts to ‘integrate’ this impossibility to systematically
think or explain the fi gure of institution into the framework of the great and pioneering work of Saint-
Just, Hume, Deleuze, Gehlen and Searle