The family-head system as inscribed in the Family Law has had enormous significance since the system regulates virtually every legal relation within the family, for instance, through designating a amily-head usually an adult-male, or the eldest son of the previous family-head. Through this simple constellation, the institution has exerted strong and complex social effects: it defines the boundary of the family, endows a kind of atural rightto be the head to a family to every adult male in Korea, while it also naturalizes the inferior status as emberto almost every adult woman in Korea.
Although the right of family-head was often conceived as a ymbolicone rather than a substantive
one, the status of a family-head becomes real enough as it means headship in the family document, i.e.
family register, which is the identification system of Korean people as well.
The history of family law in Korea is a history of women movements. This article tries to interpret
the meaning of this change within the history of legal feminism in Korea. It will examine the critical
articles that treat the women in the family in discriminatory way, and presents how the separate
articles interrelate with each other as a system. Based upon this examination, it will introduce the
constitutional case regarding this family-head system. From the analysis of the constitutional case, the
essay will discuss the question of raditionand colonialism. This will be a critical effort for not only
interpreting legal history but also envisioning future change
