A Reputational Model of Conflict: Why Die to Win?

Abstract

This paper considers a simple model of zero-sum conflict between two players ( e.g., territorial dispute) in which costly actions ( e.g., terrorism) are available to one side. We identify how reputation effects shape the outcome of such conflict. A small prior of fanatic commitment type induces the possibility of costly attack followed by withdrawal in equilibrium. The chance of withdrawal is proportional to the self-inflicted cost of attack.This work was supported by the Je-Won Research Foundation Grant funded via the Institute of Economic Research at Seoul National University

    Similar works