Latinis, D. Kyle

Murphy, Stephen A

SOAS Research Online

       SEP - NOV 2017#6HIGHLIGHTSNSCUPCOMING EVENT:Imperial Rice Transportation of Nguyen Vietnam (1802-1883) by Tana LiFEATURES:Uncovering a Hidden Temple: Ta Mok Shwegugyi, KyaukseLegislation on Underwater Cultural Heritage in Southeast AsiaSema Stones and Mountain Palaces from the Dawn of Angkor Book Review:Nalanda, Srivijaya and Beyond: Re-exploring Buddhist Art in AsiaA Dusun-type jar, extricated from the sediments covering the 9th century Belitung Wreck. Several were smashed by looters to access Changsha bowls within. (Photo: Michael Flecker)CONTENTSEditorial - pg 1Features - pg 2Uncovering a Hidden Temple: Ta Mok Shwegugyi, KyaukseLegislation on Underwater Cultural Heritage in Southeast AsiaSema Stones and Mountain Palaces from the Dawn of Angkor Book Review - pg 10Nalanda, Srivijaya and Beyond: Re-exploring Buddhist Art in AsiaPeople - pg 11New Visiting ResearchersPublic Outreach - pg 12Archaeology Programme for StudentsRecent Publications and Upcoming Events - pg 13The ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute (formerly Institute of Southeast Asian Studies) is an autonomous organization established in 1968. It is a regional centre dedicated to the study of socio-political, security, and economic trends and developments in Southeast Asia and its wider geostrategic and economic environment. The Institute’s research programmes are grouped under Regional Economic Studies (RES), Regional Strategic and Political Studies (RSPS), and Regional Social and Cultural Studies (RSCS). The Institute is also home to the ASEAN Studies Centre (ASC), the Nalanda-Sriwijaya Centre (NSC) and the Singapore APEC Centre.The Nalanda-Sriwijaya Centre (NSC) at the ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore, pursues research on historical interactions among Asian societies and civilisations. It serves as a forum for the comprehensive study of the ways in which Asian polities and societies have interacted over time through religious, cultural, and economic exchanges, and diasporic networks. The Centre also offers innovative strategies for examining the manifestations of hybridity, convergence and mutual learning in a globalising Asia. NSC HIGHLIGHTSis published by the Nalanda-Sriwijaya Centre (NSC) at ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute and available electronically at www.iseas.edu.sg.Editorial ChairmanTan Chin TiongExecutive EditorTerence ChongManaging EditorFoo Shu TiengEditorial CommitteeNicholas ChanFong Sok EngKao Jiun FengLim Chen SianDavid Kyle Latinis Hélène NjotoISSN: 2424-9211ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute 30 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Pasir Panjang 119614Tel: (65) 6778 0955Fax: (65) 6778 1735ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute is not responsible for facts represented and views expressed. Responsibility rests exclusively with the individual author(s). No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without permission. Comments are welcome and may be sent to the author(s). Copyright is held by the author(s) of each article.Sema Stones and Mountain Palaces from the Dawn of AngkorBy D. Kyle Latinis1 and Stephen Murphy21V is i t ing Fe l low,  NSC2Curator  (Southeast  Asia) ,  Asian Civ i l isat ions MuseumIn 2015, the NSC Archaeology Unit and APSARA National Authority conducted archaeological research at two sema stone sites in Cambodia. Further support was provided by the Asian Civilisations Museum. The sema stone sites, Peam Kre and Don Meas, are located adjacent to the Banteay site atop Phnom Kulen (Kulen Mountain; Mahendraparvata) in the Angkorian homeland at Siem Reap. Phnom Kulen is widely considered to be the holy mountain and birthplace of the Angkorian Empire under the reign of Jayavarman II—a Saivite king—where he first orchestrated the renowned devaraja ritual in 802 CE. The ritual has critical symbolic and political importance. It remains a topic of great debate concerning possible ‘god-king’ interpretations and the ensuing implications. Peam Kre and Don Meas sema stone sites consist of carved stone slabs ritually arranged to demarcate sacred Buddhist structures or spaces. The Banteay site comprises several terraces, platforms, pavements, and other landscape modifications. Banteay is now considered to be the ruins of Jayavarman II’s early 9th century mountain palace after LiDAR analysis revealed the ancient urban landscape and palace-like grounds (Evans 2016; Evans et al. 2015). Archaeological research by the NSC and APSARA teams also confirmed subsurface palace architecture during the 2014 excavation campaign at Banteay (brick stairs, pavements, and postholes for wooden structures).LiDAR and ground survey also revealed that Don Meas and Peam Kre are located at the perimeter of the Banteay site. Previously, the spatial connections between the sema stone sites and the palace were unknown, primarily because the extent and nature of the Banteay site had not been established until recently. The close proximities of the sites along with their contemporaneous nature (8th/9th century CE) were likely no coincidence, suggesting that Jayavarman II also supported Buddhist religious groups. Interestingly, Buddhist monks and perhaps whole communities possibly migrated from the Khorat Plateau. They may have arrived to seek royal patronage and perhaps solidify socio-political and economic alliances between the newly formed Angkorian kingdom and neighbouring Dvaravati polities among other explanations. Ancient sema stone traditions dating from the 7th–10th centuries CE are ISEAS – Yusof Ishak InstituteNSC HIGHLIGHTS7#6 • Sep-Nov • 2017Left: Unearthing sema stone with floral-like cakra at Dons Meas. Above: Ornate sema stone with spoked cakra motif, Don Meas. (Photos: D.Kyle Latinis)Dr. Ea Darith photographing a sema with unique design, Peam Kre. (Photo: D.Kyle Latinis)predominantly found in the Khorat Plateau of modern day Thailand and to a lesser extent in Cambodia and Laos. Most are affiliated with a Dvaravati tradition. The definition of Dvaravati is not consistent. Different researchers varyingly refer to Dvaravati as an art tradition, archaeological remains, ancient polities, and past cultures belonging to ancient Mon-Khmer ethno-linguistic groups with Buddhism strongly represented in the material culture. Sema stones are Buddhist boundary markers that demarcate ritual space. They may have had additional functions related to spiritual protection or assigning other types of spatial boundaries. Specific sema stone arrangements likely defined the perimeters of ubosot (uposathaghara in Pali)—a structure where ritual ceremonies such as ordinations took place.The sema stones are generally placed upright in rectangular or square arrangements with the stones located at each of the corners and midpoints. In some cases, stones are doubled for a total of 16. There are also sites where 20 or more stones occur. The greatest length of a site’s long axis does not usually exceed 20–30 m. Some sites are built on a platform, foundation or terrace made of hard enduring material such as rock, sand, and clay fill or paving. Centrally placed ubosot were presumably made of perishable wood and organic materials, but not brick, stone, or laterite like typical Hindu temples and shrines of that period.Common morphological types of sema stones include slab, pillar, octagonal, and unfashioned shapes. Sandstone is the most typical material. Stones range in size from approximately 50–300 cm tall and 20–80 cm thick. Some are plain, others have simple motifs, and many have highly ornate carvings of symbols, narrative panels, and inscriptions.The Peam Kre and Don Meas sites were first recorded by Boulbet and Dagens (1973) who described several of the more ornately carved stones. They provided plan views, photographs, drawings, and descriptions within a broader inventory of archaeological sites at Phnom Kulen. Both sema sites exhibit double stone arrangements (16 slab style sema stones each). Many of the stones are ornately carved with stupa-kumbha, dharmacakra (Wheel of the Law), and other unique designs. A few portray intricate scenes from important narratives. The stones were still upright and mostly intact during the original assessment by Boulbet and Dagens. A few broken stones were repaired. The sites have since been looted with almost all stones having been disturbed and moved. At least one beautifully carved stone depicting Gaja Lakshmi—the goddess Lakshmi flanked by elephants—has disappeared. Fortunately, most stones still remain. Subsequently, Dr. Stephen Murphy (2010) researched the sites in conjunction with his greater doctoral focus on the ancient sema stone tradition in northeast Thailand and central Laos. An APSARA team also reviewed the sites during a more recent Phnom Kulen archaeological assessment.Many of the motifs on the sema from Phnom Kulen depict dharmacakra and/or stupa motifs. These designs have their origins in the sema of the Khorat Plateau, particularly the stupa form. The dharmacakra found at Phnom Kulen, however are more elaborate. The rim of the wheel is decorated with either one or two bands of small circular motifs. Some of the wheels are flanked by elaborate floral or flame-like patterns which appear to be almost enveloping the whole Above: Sema stone with stupa motif being excavated by local labor manager who also worked with Boulbet in the 1970s. (Photo: D. Kyle Latinis)“Sema stones are Buddhist boundary markers that demarcate ritual space. They may have had additional functions related to spiritual protection or assigning other types of spatial boundaries.”Left: Map of Siem Reap and Phnom Kulen (areas in red indicate LiDAR survey zones; map courtesy of APSARA). Right: Google Earth satellite image of site locations with the LiDAR outline of the Banteay site superimposed; normally invisible from aerials or satellite. (Photo: D. Kyle Latinis)NSC HIGHLIGHTS8ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute #6 • Sep-Nov • 2017dharmacakra. On some examples, the dharmacakra is placed on stupa-kumbha (pot) motif. In some cases the kumbhas are depicted with ample vegetation issuing forth which end in volute type designs reminiscent of those found on the spokes of three-dimensional cakras from central Thailand. In these cases, the dharmacakra appear to be emerging from the mouth of the kumbha pot along with the floral motifs. On another example, the kumbha pot is flanked by a lion and a boar, while on a further example the pot is shown with a monkey climbing up its side. The fact that the stupa-kumbha motif is present alongside, or at times as part of the dharmacakra motif, illustrates that the artists responsible for the carving of these sema were extremely familiar with the existing motifs from the Khorat Plateau. This strongly points towards the idea that a group of Buddhist monks and craftsmen decided to move from this region, perhaps in the vicinity of the Mun River, and settled on Phnom Kulen in an attempt to establish a Buddhist community there. The conflation of the stupa-kumbha motif with the dharmacakra was most likely a conscious choice, perhaps in an attempt to forge new and more dynamic religious symbolism.Our recent archaeological research was intended to record further details of the sema stones, assess current conditions, and conduct excavations to determine the nature of structural remains, material culture, stratigraphy, geomorphology, and the extent of looting.Mapping and test excavations indicate that Don Meas was built atop a rock outcrop on a rubble filled platform with a simple stone alignment. Don Meas has a commanding view of the valley and floodplains. Peam Kre was built close to the existing stream at the base of the peak that contains the Banteay site. Peam Kre had no hard platform or foundation, and was likely built on soil fill. The archaeological team also discovered a sema stone quarry adjacent to the Don Meas site. Two unfinished or rejected sema stone blanks were partially carved out of sandstone outcroppings—the channeling marks of the quarrying techniques are clearly visible. Incidentally, there is an ancient brick and stone Hindu shrine site near Don Meas which bears the same name. However, it may be completely unrelated to the Don Meas or Banteay sites. It has been heavily looted and damaged.Artefact content at both sema sites, notwithstanding the sema stones themselves, were minimal—yielding 160 potsherds in 7 trenches at Peam Kre (approximately 60 m2 in total were excavated) and 110 potsherds in 1 trench at Don Meas (approximately 15 m2 were excavated). However, most of the potsherds are fine paste earthenware. A spout from a kendi (spouted ritual water pot) was also recovered. These wares are typical of assemblages from the late Funan period (4th–6th centuries CE) and, less robustly, the Chenla period (7th–8th centuries CE). Interestingly, despite Phnom Kulen harbouring a vast glazed and unglazed stoneware kiln industry beginning in the 9th century (particularly Khmer green glazed ware) with a massive set of kilns at Anlong Thom only a few kilometres from Peam Kre, no stoneware was recovered from either site. In fact, we know of no stoneware at the Banteay site. Surface surveys do not indicate any significant stoneware scatters as well, although they are abundant at other Phnom Kulen sites. This leads us to hypothesise that the Banteay palace site and the sema stone sites were abandoned by the mid-9th century or earlier—the space not being subsequently reused (perhaps considered taboo). ReferencesBoulbet, J. and Dagens, B. (1973). ‘Les sites archeologiques de la region du Bhnam Gulen’, Arts Asiatiques XXVII: 1-130. Evans, D. (2016). Airborne laser scanning as a method for exploring long-term socio- ecological dynamics in Cambodia. Journal of Archaeological Science 72:1-12.Evans, D., Kasper H., and Roland F. (2015). The story beneath the canopy: an airborne lidar survey over Angkor, Phnom Kulen and Koh Ker, northwestern Cambodia. In Across Space and Time. Selected Papers from the 41st Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 25-28 March 2013, Perth:38-46. ed. Arianna Traviglia. Amsterdam University Press: 38-46.Murphy, S. A. (2010).  The Buddhist Boundary Makers of Northeast Thailand and Central Laos, 7th-12th Centuries CE: Towards an Understanding of the Archaeological, Religious, and Artistic Landscapes of the Khorat Plateau.  PhD. Diss.  School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.  Electronic version available at http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/12204/.Sema stone with a dharmacakra motif, Buriram province, Thailand. (Photo: Stephen Murphy)“This strongly points towards the idea that a group of Buddhist monks and craftsman decided to move from this region, perhaps in the vicinity of the Mun River, and settled on Phnom Kulen in an attempt to establish a Buddhist community there.”Another sema stone with dharmacakra motif and monkey motif on the right. Peam Kre, Phnom Kulen, Cambodia. (Photo: D. Kyle Latinis)ISEAS – Yusof Ishak InstituteNSC HIGHLIGHTS9#6 • Sep-Nov • 2017

Sema Stones and Mountain Palaces from the Dawn of Angkor

https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/34690/1/Latinis%20and%20Murphy%202017.pdf

Sema Stones and Mountain Palaces from the Dawn of Angkor

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

SOAS Research Online