Combining biologic monoclonal antibodies with chemotherapeutic cytotoxic drugs provides clinical benefit to patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, but the optimal choice of the initial biologic therapy in previously untreated patients is unknown

Atkins, James Norman

Benson, Al B.

Berry, Scott

Bertagnolli, Monica M.

Blanke, Charles

El-Khoueiry, Anthony B.

Fruth, Briant

Goldberg, Richard M.

Greene, Claire

Hochster, Howard S.

Innocenti, Federico

Lenz, Heinz-Josef

Mayer, Robert J.

Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A.

Mulkerin, Daniel L.

Niedzwiecki, Donna

O'Neil, Bert H.

O'Reilly, Eileen M.

Polite, Blase N.

Schilsky, Richard L.

Schrag, Deborah

Venook, Alan P.

Watson, Peter

English

ImportanceCombining biologic monoclonal antibodies with chemotherapeutic cytotoxic drugs provides clinical benefit to patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, but the optimal choice of the initial biologic therapy in previously untreated patients is unknown.ObjectiveTo determine if the addition of cetuximab vs bevacizumab to the combination of leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) regimen or the combination of leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen is superior as first-line therapy in advanced or metastatic KRAS wild-type (wt) colorectal cancer.Design, setting, and participantsPatients (≥18 years) enrolled at community and academic centers throughout the National Clinical Trials Network in the United States and Canada (November 2005-March 2012) with previously untreated advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer whose tumors were KRAS wt chose to take either the mFOLFOX6 regimen or the FOLFIRI regimen as chemotherapy and were randomized to receive either cetuximab (n = 578) or bevacizumab (n = 559). The last date of follow-up was December 15, 2015.InterventionsCetuximab vs bevacizumab combined with either mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI chemotherapy regimen chosen by the treating physician and patient.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was overall survival. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival and overall response rate, site-reported confirmed or unconfirmed complete or partial response.ResultsAmong 1137 patients (median age, 59 years; 440 [39%] women), 1074 (94%) of patients met eligibility criteria. As of December 15, 2015, median follow-up for 263 surviving patients was 47.4 months (range, 0-110.7 months), and 82% of patients (938 of 1137) experienced disease progression. The median overall survival was 30.0 months in the cetuximab-chemotherapy group and 29.0 months in the bevacizumab-chemotherapy group with a stratified hazard ratio (HR) of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77-1.01; P = .08). The median progression-free survival was 10.5 months in the cetuximab-chemotherapy group and 10.6 months in the bevacizumab-chemotherapy group with a stratified HR of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.84-1.08; P = .45). Response rates were not significantly different, 59.6% vs 55.2% for cetuximab and bevacizumab, respectively (difference, 4.4%, 95% CI, 1.0%-9.0%, P = .13).Conclusions and relevanceAmong patients with KRAS wt untreated advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, there was no significant difference in overall survival between the addition of cetuximab vs bevacizumab to chemotherapy as initial biologic treatment.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00265850

Venook, Alan P

Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A

O'Neil, Bert H

Polite, Blase N

O'Reilly, Eileen M

Goldberg, Richard M

Hochster, Howard S

Schilsky, Richard L

Bertagnolli, Monica M

El-Khoueiry, Anthony B

Benson, Al B

Mulkerin, Daniel L

Mayer, Robert J

eScholarship - University of California

Effect of First-Line Chemotherapy Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab on Overall Survival in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Carolina Digital Repository

http://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/1c18dn353

Effect of First-Line Chemotherapy Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab on Overall Survival in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

eScholarship - University of California

Carolina Digital Repository