Banerjee, Anirban

Bhattacharjee, P.

Blake, Holly

Hendrick, Paul

Nottingham ePrints

Banerjee, Anirban and Hendrick, Paul and Bhattacharjee, P. and Blake, Holly (2016) A systematic review of outcome measures utilised to measure the change in self-management in clinical trials in non-cancer chronic pain. In: UK Society for Behavioural Medicine 12th Annual Scientific Meeting, 1-2 Dec. 2016, Cardiff, UK. Access from the University of Nottingham repository: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38996/1/2016%20Banerjee%20et%20al%20Systematic%20Review%20Pain%20UKSBM.pdfCopyright and reuse: The Nottingham ePrints service makes this work by researchers of the University of Nottingham available open access under the following conditions.This article is made available under the University of Nottingham End User licence and may be reused according to the conditions of the licence.  For more details see: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdfA note on versions: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.For more information, please contact eprints@nottingham.ac.ukCitation:	Banerjee	A,	Hendrick	P,	Bhattacharjee	P,	Blake	H.	A	systematic	review	of	outcome	measures	utilised	to	measure	the	change	in	self-management	in	clinical	trials	in	non-cancer	chronic	pain.	In:	Proceedings	of	the	UK	Society	for	Behavioural	Medicine	12th	Annual	Scientific	Meeting,	Cardiff,	Thursday	1st	-	Friday	2nd	December	2016.		A	systematic	review	of	outcome	measures	utilised	to	measure	the	change	in	self-management	in	clinical	trials	in	non-cancer	chronic	pain	Anirban	Banerjee1,2,	Paul	Hendrick1,	P	Bhattacharjee2,	Holly	Blake1	1University	of	Nottingham,	Nottingham,	UK,	2MSK	Physiotherapy,	Nottingham	CityCare,	Nottingham,	UK	Background:	There	is	lack	of	clarity	and	consistency	in	assessing	the	outcomes	of	self-management	support	programmes.	Measures	used	often	focus	on	particular	constructs	or	behaviours	such	as	pain,	functional	disability	or	self-efficacy.	Aim:	Appraise	and	synthesise	the	evidence	on	outcome	measures	utilised	to	measure	the	effectiveness	of	self-management	intervention	in	patients	with	non-cancer	non-episodic	chronic	pain.	Methods:	Medline,	Embase,	CINAHL,	PsycINFO,	the	Cochrane	Library	and	Google	Scholar	were	searched	in	March	2015	(updated	in	February	2016).	Included	full	text	primary	research	reports	of	randomised	or	nonrandomised	controlled	trials,	using	SM	outcome	measure	to	examine	effectiveness	of	nonsurgical	interventions	in	adult	participants.	Study	selection	and	risk	of	bias	assessment	was	performed	by	two	independent	reviewers.	Cochrane	Handbook,	the	Cochrane	Back	Review	Group	and	the	Preferred	Reporting	Items	for	Systematic	Reviews	and	Meta-Analyses	(PRISMA)	guidelines	were	followed.	Results:	2381	records	were	identified.	27	studies	were	included	(24	in	original	2015	search,	further	4	in	updated	2016	search).	All	were	RCTs	including	30-812	patients	with	chronic	pain	conditions	including	hip/knee	osteoarthritis,	rheumatoid	arthritis,	chronic	low	back	pain,	fibromyalgia	and	chronic	fatigue	syndrome.	Most	included	studies	had	low	risk	of	bias	with	the	exception	of	blinding.	14	different	validated	measures	were	used	in	measuring	SM	and	its	change.	Conclusions:	This	systematic	review	presents	the	range	of	scales	available	for	assessing	change	in	SM	in	non-cancer	chronic	pain.	Multi-construct	scales	are	recommended	for	assessing	SM	alongside	traditional	pain	and	disability	scales	in	chronic	pain	research	and	clinical	practice.		

A systematic review of outcome measures utilised to measure the change in self-management in clinical trials in non-cancer chronic pain

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Nottingham ePrints