337-346In general, intellectual property systems do
not protect ideas but only their practical applications. To grant protection,
patent law imposes stringent checks like novelty, non-obviousness, and utility,
while copyright law involves a lower threshold of originality. Patentability
determinations have undergone considerable disarray over the last few decades.
The question to be answered is whether pure science has become patentable as against
scientific development even as legal reforms have tightened the standards for
patentability narrowing it to reduce the scope of patent-eligible subject
matter and to make patents harder to acquire (thus easier to invalidate) based
on obviousness. Can simple advances in
science and its methods be regarded as patentable or should there be
significant progress for satisfying patentability criteria is a question that
needs to be answered.
</span