Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Rochester. Program in Visual and Cultural Studies, 2014.This dissertation concerns the shifting notion of what I call “democratic
aesthetics” in South Korea from the 1980s--a decade when the country’s pro-democracy
social movement called “minjung undong” (lit. “people’s movement”) provided a
political stage of postcolonial, anti-statist, and anti-authoritarian dissent until its nationwide
spread effectively forced the dictator to step down by 1987. The heroic participation
of artists as a propaganda unit during this successful march towards democracy in the
1980s is well noted in the country’s political history. Yet the history of art has yet to
consider the exhibition values as well as the formal and aesthetic implications of the
political art of this period--which, by 1985, obtained the moniker “minjung misul” (lit.
“people’s art”). This dissertation begins by addressing this lack, and furthermore it asks
the question about political art after the institution of parliamentary democracy. In other
words, what happened to art when the political struggle was over? In the 1990s and the
2000s, how did South Korean artists constantly reactivate their political engagement with
the shifting realities in the age of globalization and neoliberal urban development, as well
as democracy?
This inquiry has led me to concentrate on four specific moments of “democratic
aesthetics”: the conceptualization of dissident reality by artist groups Reality and
Utterance and Gwangju Freedom Artist Association in the early 1980s; Choi Jeong-hwa’s
postcolonial mimesis of vernacular and commercial urban landscape in the late 1980s to
the 1990s; art collectives Sungnam Project and FlyingCity’s pursuit of publicness in
neoliberal urbanization in the late 1990s to the early 2000s; and the democratic
understanding of division with North Korea in the art of Oh Yoon, Sin Hak-chul, and
Seung Woo Back from the 1980s to mid-2000s.
Establishing a genealogy of Korean contemporary art within the concurrent
workings of political democratization and cultural globalization, this dissertation
ultimately constitutes an epistemological inquiry into three implicated terms: “Korean
(hankuk)”; “contemporary (hy!ndae)”; “art (misul).” As a visual and cultural studies
inquiry into the history of political aesthetics in South Korea, a country still reconciling
with its (post-)colonial dilemma and an antagonistic relationship with the “other” Korea
in the North, this dissertation seeks to contribute to, and complicate, how art history has
thus far envisioned the 20th-century history of political avant-garde art