Using a sample of 17,544 firms from 28 countries we explore how creditors influence dividend payouts in
various disclosure regimes. Poorly-protected creditors do not restrict the practice by firms in opaque
regimes of using large dividend payouts to build reputation capital, and place few restrictions on dividend
payouts in transparent regimes. In intermediate disclosure regimes creditors place large restrictions on
dividend payouts. Dividend payouts are always largest in transparent regimes. Our findings say that the
disclosure standards versions of the outcome and substitution agency models of dividends are not
mutually-exclusive, and are as effective under weak as they are under strong creditor rights