This short article explains the development of a closing project developed with students of English as a foreign language. The project emerged with the idea of innovating in the classroom and trying to make links with their reality which could help developed a more meaningful process. Students involved study English for different reasons but most of them do it as a complementary activity for their job or study. They attend classes on the weekends so this project was enhanced also with the intention to break the old scheme of the foreign language as an additional but unconnected activity. The cooperative work and the motivation arisen from this task were some of the more valuable results

Bonilla Medina, S X

Cruz Arcila, F

Universidad Pedagogical Nacional-Colombia

Vargas Torres, M R

English

UEL Research Repository at University of East London

EXPERIENCE OF PREPARING A CLOSING SESSIONLanguage is not static; the world is not either… as teachers we should innovate.  Research is the core of our profession. Looking for ways to change the traditional vision of our English classrooms, trying to provide our students new opportunities to learn through the use of language, some of us thought of creating a closing session where the students had to prepare a play and perform it in front of an audience.  This idea emerged after reflecting on many theorists’ ideas which entail that the basis of learning a second language should emphasize on meaning more than language itself, in other words, communication more than linguistic forms.  Then, the proposal of performing a closing session could be a task which involved those characteristics if we applied a procedure taking into account those theories. In order to undertake a task, we should understand what it includes.  For instance, Breen 1987:23 in Nunan said “A task is any structured language learning which has a particular objective, appropriate content, a specified working procedure and a range of outcomes for those who undertake the task.  It’s a number of plans which have the purpose of facilitating the learner’s development from simple to more complex tasks” in regards to that definition we had to organize a plan which implicated all of those conditions.  Then, we had to establish some principles which were part of the planning stage of any task ​[1]​ and they were: principles of selection, the ones referring to what topics to develop; principles of development, the ones referring to class procedures; principles of making decisions, the ones referring to task performance and principles on diagnosis; the ones referring to evaluation of the procedure and the final result.  We organized a general goal which later had to be sub-categorized into specific objectives according to the process of preparing and the performance stage in the following way: 	GOAL: Students will show and participate in a sample of a communicative semi-real situation. PROCESS OF PREPARING	Selecting the subject to deal withObjective: Students will brainstorm and discuss on suitable topics. For this activity it was necessary to work with the group in general, the students could listen to their partners’ ideas and approve or reject what they considered so.  The role of the teachers was as a free controller​[2]​ who had to limit their ideas to their background knowledge. “ Make sure that  you challenge your students sufficiently but without overwhelming them” ​[3]​, students shouldn’t be damaged by the influence of reloaded input. The students gave a lot of opinions but my role as a teacher tried to help them to choose an option which was possible for them to handle in terms of language. 	Searching on information about the selected subject Objective:Students will be able to interpret, abstract and create new information based on extracts of real and semi-real sources. For this part of the process, the students had to investigate from different sources and authentic materials and this search had to be the main tool for their final presentation.  I handle three groups with pretty different needs in terms of learning styles and they showed as a common factor that they liked to approach nowadays tendencies from mass media.  For example, one of the groups agreed in preparing a presentation in which they could play out a reality show, a program on television which was called “Robinson expedition”.  For that purpose, they had to look at the program several times and realize everything necessary to make a similar program. Although the input in this case was in Spanish, the students had to think they way they could use that program to apply the English concepts they had worked in class.   Another example was a group who wanted to prepare a song; they had to look for the lyrics and to understand what they meant in order to propose it in class.  My role as a teacher was to direct​[4]​ all the ideas, to point them to stimulate their background knowledge and at the same time to control the influence of overwhelming language. That step of investigation was linked to another which I called the socialization of ideas for the final performance. “A group of students carrying out a successful role play in a classroom has much in common with a group of children playing school, doctors and nurses or Star Wars.  Both are unselfconsciously creating their own reality and, by doing so, are experimenting their knowledge of the real world and developing their ability to interact with other people”​[5]​ After the students searched the necessary information, they had to interact with their partners and to choose the options they feel more secure about because of the projection of language use and the roles to play in accordance with their personalities.   The role of the teacher as a manager, controller and director contributed to make the final decisions.	Assigning roles to role-playObjective: Students will match the roles with their personalities.It is very important to stress that in this stage personality was the main component. Students had to evaluate their personalities and choose a character who they feel more comfortable with in the moment of performance. This procedure made students understand their responsibility and also helped them produce language more naturally. “ …once students understand what they are trying to do in role, their imagination is often liberate and the fantasy becomes a very enriching and useful linguistic experience”​[6]​.  My role as a teacher was as a psychologist who had to enter the student’s mind to understand if they were going to work with the roles they had been assigned. 	Preparing the transcriptsObjective: Students will interact with their partners using the target language and will be able to organize a coherent part of speech to fit a semi-real conversation.This part of the task dealt with “output”.  Most of the teachers became stressed when they were asked to developed a task, they worried about time-cosuming because it was hard for them to understand that not only output should be the objective, the process involved in getting a final result was.  Richards Plat and Weber 1986:89 in Nunan state that a task is an activity or action that requires the processing of language understanding and it can or can’t involve language production.  For that reason, the teacher’s concern about time didn’t have to be a problem indeed. However, this part of preparing the transcripts encouraged the teacher and the students to demonstrate their language ability, in that way, students had the commitment of taking out the best of their previous knowledge to put it in play.  The pedagogical implication of this part was not only the display of that input to turn into output, the richest part is the cooperative work in which the students seem to be involved.  The students had to work in groups to build up their scripts, their ideas and their partners’ were mixed up and in that way they were able to integrate their background knowledge, their previous knowledge and their partners helped them re-call what they possibly forgot. The teacher’s role was more as a facilitator, a facilitator who capitalizes on the principles of intrinsic motivation by allowing students to discover language through using it pragmatically rather than telling them about language.​[7]​ The teacher motivates the recall of language forms through a less controlled environment and the students worked by exploring what they had previously learned.  Moreover, it is also necessary to highlight that not only previous knowledge was part of this activity, sometimes students wanted to say more than the language they had learned, in terms of vocabulary or language forms, so as Krashen said they were asking for one plus more, which means,  producing a little higher of what they actually know, and the role of the teacher was as a resource​[8]​ in who the students take the initiative to come to. The teacher had to be a help-tool to give confidence to them to use the language appropriately. 	Rehearsing Objective: Students will be able to produce attempts to communicate in which the negotiation of meaning and strategies of communication are explicit. In this part of the process, students had to put into practice what they were working through with their partners. In agreement to Brown’s words that was the most controlled teacher’s role. When the students rehearsed I had to monitor their specific aspects of language, that is, pronunciation, grammar forms, fluency, intonation, vocabulary and so on. And consequently, students were acquiring awareness in their output and monitoring themselves.  The scope of working on mistakes lent a hand for them to detect the path of student’s language acquisition and also aided them to step up on their target language. 	Preparing the settings and the costumes to wear in the presentation Objective: Students will provide more meaningful messages as they contextualize their situations. The importance of this part of the process was more than simply choosing the best way to dress up or the most attractive scenery for our audience. It has to do with the way the language was going to be more comprehensible to transmit a message to our interlocutors who, in this case, were the audience.  In all kind of communication, interaction plays an important role and that interaction has to do with negotiation of meaning which was involved not only in the verbal language but also in the kin esthetics and the social context. Those elements mixed up in a role-play gave the importance of preparing a meaningful scenery where the cooperative exchange of the audience’s responses facilitate the fluency of communication.  In this aspect Brown states that “interaction is the collaborative exchange of thoughts, feelings, or ideas between two or more people resulting in a reciprocal effect on each other”.  Then we could say the audience’s response to the student’s presentation was crucial to demonstrate they understood the message but also to motivate the students to improve and improvise language forms and meanings. PERFORMANCE STAGEObjective: Students will perform a role-play and improvise language if it requires so. This was the top of the task, the moment when the students had to show a result of such a complex procedure, the result of hours of work, the moment of facing a real audience.  Many feelings grew up in that moment, students felt afraid, students showed anxiety, students were so excited that I was sure those feeling were going to influence them positively, they were going to encourage them to do it better.  As Brown​[9]​ said “interaction requires a certain degree of failing to produce intended meaning”, they knew they could forget, they could make mistakes, but also they knew they could improvise, they could understand that was their learning process.  This was going to help them to evaluate themselves because “they more fully appreciate their own competence to use the language, they could develop a system of self-reward”​[10]​. They were going to try and in order to try, the risk had to be taken. In this activity more than language was going to be part of their work, their communication strategies had to come into view, the students had to look for synonyms when they forgot, they had to paraphrase, they had to re-call, they had to avoid difficult words and so on.  We, as teachers know that all of these communication strategies are the valuable and in these groups they were because students could understand their target language was in progress and they could improve just with practice and with a enormous desire. As a conclusion I can say that, although for this task it was really important the teacher, the person who clearly understood the idea of having in mind the prior principles, some of us failed in demonstrating the same feeling to our students,- paraphrasing Nuna’s words, a learner believes what the teacher believes- and several teachers didn’t comprehend the real purpose of the task and eventually the general goal was the only visible task and they forgot the importance of developing a valuable process too. ^1	  Nunan, David. Developing and Desining tasks. 199…^2	  Brown, Douglas. Teaching by Principles, 19…^3	  Ibid^4	  Ibid^5	  Porter Ladousse Gillian, Role play, 1987, Oxford University press^6	  Ibid^7	  Brown, Douglas. Teaching by Principles, 19…^8	  Ibid^9	  Ibid^10	  Ibid 

The experience of preparing a closing session

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/download/262b8df301aff1a466f3462cb765cbbf73e6d819c4c80481db4c7a57abd8b605/51712/Experience%20of%20closing%20session.doc

The experience of preparing a closing session

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

UEL Research Repository at University of East London