CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Temporal estimation in prediction motion tasks is biased by a moving destination
Authors
BT Barrett
NB Beebe
+6 more
SJ Bennett
JG Buckley
AG Cruickshank
JC Flavell
JM Harris
AJ Scally
Publication date
13 December 2017
Publisher
'Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)'
Doi
Abstract
© 2018 The Authors. An ability to predict the time-to-contact (TTC) of moving objects that become momentarily hidden is advantageous in everyday life and could be particularly so in fast-ball sports. Prediction motion (PM) experiments have sought to test this ability using tasks where a disappearing target moves toward a stationary destination. Here, we developed two novel versions of the PM task in which the destination either moved away from (Chase) or toward (Attract) the moving target. The target and destination moved with different speeds such that collision occurred 750, 1,000 or 1,250 ms after target occlusion. To determine if domain-specific experience conveys an advantage in PM tasks, we compared the performance of different sporting groups ranging from internationally competing athletes to nonsporting controls. There was no difference in performance between sporting groups and non-sporting controls but there were significant and independent effects on response error by target speed, destination speed, and occlusion period. We simulated these findings using a revised version of the linear TTC model of response timing for PM tasks (Yakimoff, Bocheva, & Mitrania, 1987; Yakimoff, Mateeff, Ehrenstein, & Hohnsbein, 1993) in which retinal input from the moving destination biases the internal representation of the occluded target. This revision closely reproduced the observed patterns of response error and thus describes a means by which the brain might estimate TTC when the target and destination are in motion
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
LJMU Research Online (Liverpool John Moores University)
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk:...
Last time updated on 08/03/2018
University of St Andrews Research Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:research-portal.st-andrews...
Last time updated on 17/07/2024
St Andrews Research Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:research-repository.st-and...
Last time updated on 04/03/2018
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1167%2F18.2.5
Last time updated on 05/06/2019
University of St. Andrews - Pure
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:research-portal.st-andrews...
Last time updated on 29/01/2024
University of St. Andrews - Pure
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:research-portal.st-andrews...
Last time updated on 29/01/2024