open access articleIn recent years there has been growing interest in the identification of people with superior face recognition skills,
for both theoretical and applied investigations. These individuals have mostly been identified via their performance
on a single attempt at a tightly controlled test of face memory—the long form of the Cambridge Face Memory
Test (CFMT+). The consistency of their skills over a range of tests, particularly those replicating more applied policing
scenarios, has yet to be examined systematically. The current investigation screened 200 people who believed they
have superior face recognition skills, using the CFMT+ and three new, more applied tests (measuring face memory,
face matching and composite-face identification in a crowd). Of the sample, 59.5% showed at least some consistency
in superior face recognition performance, although only five individuals outperformed controls on overall indices of
target-present and target-absent trials. Only one participant outperformed controls on the Crowds test, suggesting that
some applied face recognition tasks require very specific skills. In conclusion, future screening protocols need to
be suitably thorough to test for consistency in performance, and to allow different types of superior performer to
be detected from the outset. Screening for optimal performers may sometimes need to directly replicate the task
in question, taking into account target-present and target-absent performance. Self-selection alone is not a reliable
means of identifying those at the top end of the face recognition spectrum