Irons, Rebecca M

English

Irons, R

UCL Discovery

286     FORUM Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale (2020) 28, 2 286–287. © 2020 The Author. Social Anthropology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Social Anthropologists.and local responses to accelerated modernity, to the voluminous literature on climate change and options for systemic change. An overheated world has been forced to slow down. What can the long‐term consequences be? Or rather: How can alternative val-ues and societal models be strengthened as a result of the enforced cooling down?Thomas Hylland EriksenDepartment of Social AnthropologyUniversity of Oslo 0317OsloNorwayt.h.eriksen@sai.uio.noR E B E C C A  I R O N SPandemic … or syndemic? Re‐framing COVID‐19 disease burden and ‘underlying health conditions’What is in a name? When the WHO declared coronavirus a global ‘pandemic’, it seems that this is when the world finally sat up to take serious notice of the impending threat as it gained momentum throughout the continents. Indeed, this change of term upgraded COVID‐19’s status from a faraway‐disease to something all‐encompassing and pan‐global. But importantly, it positioned the virus as something that should now concern ‘us’.Infectious disease epidemics are not your everyday occurrence or concern if you live in a certain part of the world; they are arguably portrayed as a scourge of post‐colonial and so‐called ‘developing’ contexts, where a European and North American audience might suspect death and disease to be a regretful, if inevitable, part of histor-ical and contemporary existence. ‘Epidemics’ and ‘disease’ happen ‘out there’. Zika took hold in the jungles of South America; Ebola ravages the civil‐war‐torn Congo; MERS infiltrated the insular Saudi peninsula; SARS erupted in Southern China. When cases arrived in Europe and North America, they were quickly contained, and the lay public had little cause for extended interaction with the news media about these epidemics.However, COVID‐19 is different in an important sense: Europe, and now the USA, have become the epicentres for the virus, challenging post‐colonial perceptions that infectious‐disease epidemics are fundamentally a non‐‘Western’ concern. Alas, it would seem that for a disease to globally register as a ‘pandemic’, it does not necessar-ily need to include the whole world, but the part of the world that considers itself the This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.FORUM    287© 2020 European Association of Social Anthropologists.most important. Certainly, reporters and observers have delighted in highlighting how COVID‐19 ‘does not discriminate’, and can kill individuals from across social strata and geographical locations. Yet, is this really true? Despite the sensationalist tabloids breathlessly reporting on the still‐rare deaths of younger people and those with no underlying health conditions, it remains that the vast mortality majority comes from the elderly and those who have pre‐existing health conditions. Coronavirus is no 1918 ‘Spanish’ Influenza that struck down a global population in its prime: this virus is over-whelmingly targeting people who would already be vulnerable to disease. From the available data, then, there is cause to suggest that this is not a pandemic, but a syndemic. A syndemic refers to the interaction of multiple epidemics that ultimately exacerbate the disease burden in certain populations and increase health vulnerability. Now, peo-ple with underlying health conditions and the elderly, whose immune systems may be weaker, are substantially more at risk from coronavirus. Significantly, multiple epi-demic disease burdens are not of great threat to Europe and North America.Here then, the Greek prefix pan‐, ‘all’ [of us], arguably does not work conceptu-ally as a name for COVID‐19. This virus will not corporeally affect us ‘all’, but will disproportionately encumber those already burdened. Going forward, understanding this virus as a syndemic could contribute to more appropriate responses in our own communities, and globally. Importantly, it could potentially influence ‘selfish’ hoard-ing and quarantine‐flouting behaviours. From the name ‘pandemic’ leaps ‘panic’; re‐addressing the term may influence behaviours that save lives in the long run.Rebecca IronsDepartment of AnthropologyUniversity College LondonLondon WC1H 0BWUKrebecca.irons.14@ucl.ac.ukS O P H I A  J AW O R S K IOn viral conceptsAs I write, a news stream announces the COVID count passing 1.4 million. I live with a healthcare worker stationed at a designated COVID‐19 hospital. If I contract the virus, my asthma will be a major problem. I face not only a pandemic, but also a social dilemma of viral concepts.‘Our pizzas are made without touch. Contactless delivery for your safety’ is the dystopian message from three different pizza ads on a TV programme I stream. They appear non‐coincidentally after talking about pizza with my roommates during a Zoom book club about Camus’s The Plague. In his fictive account of the city of Oran 

Pandemic ... or syndemic? Re-framing COVID-19 disease burden and 'underlying health conditions'

Explore Bristol Research

                          Irons, R. M. (2020). Pandemic … or syndemic? Re-framing COVID-19disease burden and 'underlying health conditions'. SocialAnthropology, 28(2), 286-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12886Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of recordLicense (if available):CC BYLink to published version (if available):10.1111/1469-8676.12886Link to publication record in Explore Bristol ResearchPDF-documentThis is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Wiley athttps://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12886 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.University of Bristol - Explore Bristol ResearchGeneral rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only thepublished version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available:http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/user-guides/explore-bristol-research/ebr-terms/286     FORUM Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale (2020) 28, 2 286–287. © 2020 The Author. Social Anthropology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Social Anthropologists.and local responses to accelerated modernity, to the voluminous literature on climate change and options for systemic change. An overheated world has been forced to slow down. What can the long‐term consequences be? Or rather: How can alternative val-ues and societal models be strengthened as a result of the enforced cooling down?Thomas Hylland EriksenDepartment of Social AnthropologyUniversity of Oslo 0317OsloNorwayt.h.eriksen@sai.uio.noR E B E C C A  I R O N SPandemic … or syndemic? Re‐framing COVID‐19 disease burden and ‘underlying health conditions’What is in a name? When the WHO declared coronavirus a global ‘pandemic’, it seems that this is when the world finally sat up to take serious notice of the impending threat as it gained momentum throughout the continents. Indeed, this change of term upgraded COVID‐19’s status from a faraway‐disease to something all‐encompassing and pan‐global. But importantly, it positioned the virus as something that should now concern ‘us’.Infectious disease epidemics are not your everyday occurrence or concern if you live in a certain part of the world; they are arguably portrayed as a scourge of post‐colonial and so‐called ‘developing’ contexts, where a European and North American audience might suspect death and disease to be a regretful, if inevitable, part of histor-ical and contemporary existence. ‘Epidemics’ and ‘disease’ happen ‘out there’. Zika took hold in the jungles of South America; Ebola ravages the civil‐war‐torn Congo; MERS infiltrated the insular Saudi peninsula; SARS erupted in Southern China. When cases arrived in Europe and North America, they were quickly contained, and the lay public had little cause for extended interaction with the news media about these epidemics.However, COVID‐19 is different in an important sense: Europe, and now the USA, have become the epicentres for the virus, challenging post‐colonial perceptions that infectious‐disease epidemics are fundamentally a non‐‘Western’ concern. Alas, it would seem that for a disease to globally register as a ‘pandemic’, it does not necessar-ily need to include the whole world, but the part of the world that considers itself the This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.FORUM    287© 2020 European Association of Social Anthropologists.most important. Certainly, reporters and observers have delighted in highlighting how COVID‐19 ‘does not discriminate’, and can kill individuals from across social strata and geographical locations. Yet, is this really true? Despite the sensationalist tabloids breathlessly reporting on the still‐rare deaths of younger people and those with no underlying health conditions, it remains that the vast mortality majority comes from the elderly and those who have pre‐existing health conditions. Coronavirus is no 1918 ‘Spanish’ Influenza that struck down a global population in its prime: this virus is over-whelmingly targeting people who would already be vulnerable to disease. From the available data, then, there is cause to suggest that this is not a pandemic, but a syndemic. A syndemic refers to the interaction of multiple epidemics that ultimately exacerbate the disease burden in certain populations and increase health vulnerability. Now, peo-ple with underlying health conditions and the elderly, whose immune systems may be weaker, are substantially more at risk from coronavirus. Significantly, multiple epi-demic disease burdens are not of great threat to Europe and North America.Here then, the Greek prefix pan‐, ‘all’ [of us], arguably does not work conceptu-ally as a name for COVID‐19. This virus will not corporeally affect us ‘all’, but will disproportionately encumber those already burdened. Going forward, understanding this virus as a syndemic could contribute to more appropriate responses in our own communities, and globally. Importantly, it could potentially influence ‘selfish’ hoard-ing and quarantine‐flouting behaviours. From the name ‘pandemic’ leaps ‘panic’; re‐addressing the term may influence behaviours that save lives in the long run.Rebecca IronsDepartment of AnthropologyUniversity College LondonLondon WC1H 0BWUKrebecca.irons.14@ucl.ac.ukS O P H I A  J AW O R S K IOn viral conceptsAs I write, a news stream announces the COVID count passing 1.4 million. I live with a healthcare worker stationed at a designated COVID‐19 hospital. If I contract the virus, my asthma will be a major problem. I face not only a pandemic, but also a social dilemma of viral concepts.‘Our pizzas are made without touch. Contactless delivery for your safety’ is the dystopian message from three different pizza ads on a TV programme I stream. They appear non‐coincidentally after talking about pizza with my roommates during a Zoom book club about Camus’s The Plague. In his fictive account of the city of Oran 

Pandemic … or syndemic? Re-framing COVID-19 disease burden and 'underlying health conditions'

https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/files/248349401/Full_text_PDF_final_published_version_.pdf

Pandemic … or syndemic? Re-framing COVID-19 disease burden and 'underlying health conditions'

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

UCL Discovery

Explore Bristol Research