While the Internet was conceived as a decentralized network, the most widely
used web applications today tend toward centralization. Control increasingly
rests with centralized service providers who, as a consequence, have also
amassed unprecedented amounts of data about the behaviors and personalities of
individuals.
Developers, regulators, and consumer advocates have looked to alternative
decentralized architectures as the natural response to threats posed by these
centralized services. The result has been a great variety of solutions that
include personal data stores (PDS), infomediaries, Vendor Relationship
Management (VRM) systems, and federated and distributed social networks. And
yet, for all these efforts, decentralized personal data architectures have seen
little adoption.
This position paper attempts to account for these failures, challenging the
accepted wisdom in the web community on the feasibility and desirability of
these approaches. We start with a historical discussion of the development of
various categories of decentralized personal data architectures. Then we survey
the main ideas to illustrate the common themes among these efforts. We tease
apart the design characteristics of these systems from the social values that
they (are intended to) promote. We use this understanding to point out numerous
drawbacks of the decentralization paradigm, some inherent and others
incidental. We end with recommendations for designers of these systems for
working towards goals that are achievable, but perhaps more limited in scope
and ambition
