The analyses of many algorithms and data structures (such as digital search
trees) for searching and sorting are based on the representation of the keys
involved as bit strings and so count the number of bit comparisons. On the
other hand, the standard analyses of many other algorithms (such as Quicksort)
are performed in terms of the number of key comparisons. We introduce the
prospect of a fair comparison between algorithms of the two types by providing
an average-case analysis of the number of bit comparisons required by
Quicksort. Counting bit comparisons rather than key comparisons introduces an
extra logarithmic factor to the asymptotic average total. We also provide a new
algorithm, "BitsQuick", that reduces this factor to constant order by
eliminating needless bit comparisons