The legal problem that the process through the penal, often form a paradigm the wrong, namely law such as merchandise.Justice desired the applicant of providers decisions, were out were decisions the results of determined by financial factors.The public and media then form an opinion about practices judicial mafia. This is invisible, but there was realy that judicial decisions sometimes far from a sense of justice. Law desired to apply justice for found justice, it hurt. This research in order to uncover of the main functions and abstacle that face in the implementation of the surveillance by the agency of the supervision of the supreme court and he knows efforts to strengthen of supervisory function of trusts and relies.The kind of research that had been selected based is research empirical legal information about or research sociological perspective. Research covered this includes also been disclosed in the research law non a doctrinal. The result is the organizational structure in the Supreme Court and the judiciary who are below do not have organizational structures in charge of supervision in particular supervision in every province. As for supervisory functions attached to the implementing Organization Restructuring must be a function of supervision, strengthening of human resources for Implementing the functions of supervision, the use of Objective Parameters in the exercise of supervision, Increased Accountability; Quality of service Complaints for the community, a redefinition of the relations of the Supreme Court and Judicial Commissions as a partner in the implementation of the supervisory Function
KEYWORDS: Internal Control, Supervisory Board, Supreme Cour