Cook, J

Cooper, C

Costa, ML

Dritsaki, M

Glaze, M

Hing, CB

Law, M

Pearse, M

Phelps, E

Smith, TO

Stokes, JR

Trompeter, A

Tutton, E

St George's Online Research Archive

CORRECTION Open AccessCorrection to: Reamed intramedullarynailing versus circular frame externalfixation for segmental tibial fractures (STIFF-F): a mixed methods feasibility studyCaroline B. Hing1*, Elizabeth Tutton2, Toby O. Smith2,3, Molly Glaze2, Jamie R. Stokes2, Jonathan Cook2,Melina Dritsaki2, Emma Phelps2, Cushla Cooper2, Alex Trompeter1, Michael Pearse4, Michael Law1 andMatthew L. Costa2Correction to: Pilot Feasibility Stud 7, 93 (2021)https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00821-3Following publication of the original article [1], the authorsreported an error in the fifth author’s last name. The fifthauthor should be Jamie R. Stokes instead of Jamie R. Law.The original article has been corrected.Author details1Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, St George’s University HospitalsNHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 2Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics,Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford,UK. 3Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia,Norwich, Norfolk, UK. 4Imperial College London, London, UK.Reference1. Hing CB, Tutton E, Smith TO, Glaze M, Stokes JR, Cook J, et al. Reamedintramedullary nailing versus circular frame external fixation for segmentaltibial fractures (STIFF-F): a mixed methods feasibility study. Pilot FeasibilityStud. 2021;7(1):93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00821-3.© The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you giveappropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate ifchanges were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commonslicence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commonslicence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtainpermission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to thedata made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00821-3.* Correspondence: caroline.hing@stgeorges.nhs.uk1Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, St George’s University HospitalsNHS Foundation Trust, London, UKFull list of author information is available at the end of the articleHing et al. Pilot and Feasibility Studies           (2021) 7:102 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00842-y

Correction to: Reamed intramedullary nailing versus circular frame external fixation for segmental tibial fractures (STIFF-F): a mixed methods feasibility study.

https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/113213/6/Correction%20to%20Reamed%20intramedullary%20nailing%20versus%20circular%20frame%20external%20fixation%20for%20segmental%20tibial%20fractures%20%28STIFF-F%29.pdf

Correction to: Reamed intramedullary nailing versus circular frame external fixation for segmental tibial fractures (STIFF-F): a mixed methods feasibility study.

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

St George's Online Research Archive