The active participation of energy consumers is regarded as essential for the effective roll-out and
development of a wide range of smart energy technologies, micro-generation and energy demand policies.
As such, the ‘active consumer’ has become a focus of European Union energy policy in recent years.
Accordingly, and as an output of the SHAPE ENERGY project, this report has two aims:
• to present and offer guidance for interested parties on different Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH)
options for examining active consumers, including suggesting how particular SSH approaches might
shape the direction of energy research and findings; and
• to examine options for the integration of different SSH disciplinary approaches to the active consumer,
as well as considering the implications of such integrations for future energy research.
While recognising multiple understandings of active consumers and their energy consumption, we adopt
a broad definition. Specifically, active (energy) consumption encompasses a level of participation by
consumers in the purchase or use of products and services, which thereby reflects some agency on the
consumers’ part and/or is itself influential in how products and services are used and designed. This can
include consumer feedback, and the use and appropriation of goods and services which go beyond that
intended by providers/manufactures and can affect future design considerations.
Drawing on an extensive review of the literature, we establish some of the key characteristics of how active
consumers and their energy demand are conceptualised in SSH, both implicitly and explicitly. Specifically,
we divide SSH approaches by their most common features into:
• Individualised approaches, which focus on answering what shapes individual decisions/actions
towards energy consumption; and
• Relational Societal approaches, which focus on energy consumption as part of an evolving and
interdependent relationship with society.
The application of either approach will carry different implications for research on the active consumer
in relation to potential energy research problems (such as smart technology participation). In particular,
there are questions over whether research can be restricted or improved by either greater interdependency
and inclusion of societal elements, as per the Relational Societal approaches; or by direct (often linear)
modelling of active consumers, as per the Individualised approaches.
We argue that Relational Societal, while more complex, offer a deeper understanding of dynamic and
widespread change. In contrast, Individualised offer greater conceptual simplicity, but appear vulnerable
on explanations of how consumption is shaped and changed. Recognising these fundamental differences
is essential for researchers and project funders when considering which SSH approaches might best serve
the development of energy interventions - this is especially important as the dominant STEM (Science,
Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) agenda would typically favour Individualised approaches.
With interdisciplinarity being a key aspiration of SHAPE ENERGY and indeed of Horizon 2020 energy work
programmes, we also consider options for integrating the two approaches. We recognise that integration
attempts need to be cautious of paradigmatic differences that can make certain forms of integration
unworkable.
On the basis of all this, we present recommendations, including to the Commission concerning future
EU research funding, to those interested in or working on interdisciplinary energy research projects and
platforms, and to fellow SHAPE ENERGY partners on the organisation of our Platform’s activities.
Across all of these recommendations, we have prioritised: the importance of including SSH approaches in
research on energy consumption; the need to acknowledge the relevance to energy consumption research
of previously neglected Relational Societal approaches; and the need to be critical when considering
interdisciplinary approaches to studying the active consumer
