CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
New ideas for non-animal approaches to predict repeated-dose systemic toxicity: Report from an EPAA Blue Sky Workshop
Authors
RS Ashton
B Birk
+19 more
AR Boobis
MTD Cronin
T Cull
GP Daston
L Ewart
TB Knudsen
C Mahony
I Manou
L Margiotta-Casaluci
S Maurer-Stroh
BP Müller
P Nordlund
RA Roberts
T Steger-Hartmann
E Vandenbossche
MR Viant
M Vinken
M Whelan
Z Zvonimir
Publication date
1 July 2020
Publisher
'Elsevier BV'
Doi
Abstract
© 2020 The Authors The European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) convened a ‘Blue Sky Workshop’ on new ideas for non-animal approaches to predict repeated-dose systemic toxicity. The aim of the Workshop was to formulate strategic ideas to improve and increase the applicability, implementation and acceptance of modern non-animal methods to determine systemic toxicity. The Workshop concluded that good progress is being made to assess repeated dose toxicity without animals taking advantage of existing knowledge in toxicology, thresholds of toxicological concern, adverse outcome pathways and read-across workflows. These approaches can be supported by New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) utilising modern molecular technologies and computational methods. Recommendations from the Workshop were based around the needs for better chemical safety assessment: how to strengthen the evidence base for decision making; to develop, standardise and harmonise NAMs for human toxicity; and the improvement in the applicability and acceptance of novel techniques. “Disruptive thinking” is required to reconsider chemical legislation, validation of NAMs and the opportunities to move away from reliance on animal tests. Case study practices and data sharing, ensuring reproducibility of NAMs, were viewed as crucial to the improvement of non-animal test approaches for systemic toxicity.U.S.Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Agency for Science, Technology and Research ( A*STAR), Singapor
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
University of Birmingham Research Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.atira.dk:openaire_cri...
Last time updated on 13/06/2020
Brunel University Research Archive
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:bura.brunel.ac.uk:2438/208...
Last time updated on 18/12/2020
University of Birmingham Research Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.atira.dk:publications...
Last time updated on 13/06/2020