Genetic association analyses often involve data from multiple
potentially-heterogeneous subgroups. The expected amount of heterogeneity can
vary from modest (e.g., a typical meta-analysis) to large (e.g., a strong
gene--environment interaction). However, existing statistical tools are limited
in their ability to address such heterogeneity. Indeed, most genetic
association meta-analyses use a "fixed effects" analysis, which assumes no
heterogeneity. Here we develop and apply Bayesian association methods to
address this problem. These methods are easy to apply (in the simplest case,
requiring only a point estimate for the genetic effect and its standard error,
from each subgroup) and effectively include standard frequentist meta-analysis
methods, including the usual "fixed effects" analysis, as special cases. We
apply these tools to two large genetic association studies: one a meta-analysis
of genome-wide association studies from the Global Lipids consortium, and the
second a cross-population analysis for expression quantitative trait loci
(eQTLs). In the Global Lipids data we find, perhaps surprisingly, that effects
are generally quite homogeneous across studies. In the eQTL study we find that
eQTLs are generally shared among different continental groups, and discuss
consequences of this for study design.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/13-AOAS695 the Annals of
Applied Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aoas/) by the Institute of
Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org