This tool describes case studies of gender implications in mechanization in RTB crops, illustrating both positive and negative outcomes. GENNOVATE research has shown that the beneficiaries of mechanization tend to be the wealthier rather than the poorer farmers and more often men than women. However, results also reveal that women have strong interest in mechanization as a way to improve their own circumstances

Babini, C.

Forsythe, L.

Kawarazuka, N.

Mayanja, S.

Mudege, N.N.

Polar, V.

Prain, G.

English

Kawarazuka, Nozomi

Prain, Gordon

Polar, Vivian

CGSpace

Gender in Agricultural Mechanization: KEY GUIDING QUESTIONS impact of mechanization on men and women is very important to ensure that both men and women will benefi t and neither will be harmed. GENNOVATE researchi has shown that the benefi ciaries of mechanization tend to be the wealthier rather than the poorer farmers and more often men than women. However, results also show that women have strong interest in mechanization as a way to improve their own circumstances. Without careful consideration of power relations existing in the community between men and women, interventions risk contributing to or exacerbating existing A resource for scientists and research teams Mechanization refers to the agricultural process of replacing manual labour or use of draught animals with machinery. Labor-saving machines are increasingly available in rural areas but not a ordable for all. To identify ways of expanding the benefi ts of mechanization to more people, a careful consideration of gendered needs and gender implications is required throughout the project cycle from design to impact assessment, and throughout the agricultural cycle, from land-preparation and cultivation to post-harvest and processing. Although your project may have already decided what to do, critical thinking about the socio-cultural and gender inequalities. At the same time, outcomes from labour saving technologies that benefi t women can also contribute to other development outcomes; for example, the extra time made available for women can be used for self, infant and family care, and other agricultural activities for income generation or household consumption. Reduced labour burden can also contribute to improved health outcomes. The following section describes case studies of gender implications in mechanization in RTB crops, illustrating some positive and negative outcomes. Photo courtesy of IITA.2machine. Men pointed to the lack of durability and a constant demand for providing services as a major limitation to e ective use of the chopper. Thus, there is need to ensure that choppers are safe to use and that farmers and local artisans are trained to repair the choppers. If the safety of the chopper is improved, the adoption rate could increase since women often expressed fear of operating it. Training a cohort of people in the community to provide services for chopping vines also helps provide opportunities to link agriculture and other rural economies and provide o -farm employment.Case Story 1: Smoke-reducing Gari fryers in south-west Nigeria Agricultural interventions have historically tended to overemphasise issues around e  ciency and quality in mechanisation processes, without looking at the socio-economic and gendered contexts in which they are embedded. Gender studies undertaken as part of the Cassava: Adding Value for Africa project found that in Nigeria, men and women are often involved in di erent types of cassava value chains, which result in di erent sets of needs and priorities of women and men in terms of mechanization interventions in relation to their position and participation in those value chains.ii In Nigeria, women are highly involved in cassava processing, particularly gari. Women typically process gari at a processing centre and pay fees for the use of a fryer and other services (e.g. press), as they do not have this equipment at their home. However, unfortunately, the frying equipment used in many locations exposes women to harmful smoke for many hours a day. Smoke-reducing gari fryers have been developed in the region to Case Story 2: Sweet potato silage chopping machines in Ugandaiii In Uganda, the silage chopper was introduced in order to make ensiling more e  cient and to reduce drudgery associated with chopping vines using pangas (sickles). However, this research shows that mechanization which is not friendly for specifi c users or well adapted to local conditions may deter adoption or limit usage and usefulness of technology. For example, women were afraid to use the chopper because of safety concerns. This limited their ability to venture into silage making on their own since they had to depend on men to operate the reduce women’s exposure to smoke and possibly increase productivity. However, visits to cassava processing centres showed minimal uptake of the technology and limitations for women in access to the technology, which would have important health benefi ts for women. This was because owners of the processing facilitates, usually male, appear to have little incentive to invest in new, smoke-reducing equipment for their clientele, as they did not perceive a direct benefi t. Other facility owners and gari processors had limited awareness of the new fryers. This example demonstrates the importance of understanding and identifying gender constraints, needs and priorities in local contexts and value chains for technological dissemination and uptake. Going forward, practical activities may consider targeting small-scale adaptations for processing mechanisation that are accessible for women independently, in order to reduce women’s labour burden and exposure to health hazards.Smoke-reducing gari fryers in Nigeria. Photo: Adekola Felix Adegoke.BA BA:  The pulley was not covered and thereby women were afraid that their children could be injured. The feeding tray was very short and when women farmers fed the vines, their fi ngers could touch the edge. Photo: VEDCO Uganda (http://www.vedcouganda.org). B: An improved chopping machine with a protection cover. Photo: Jolly Kabirizi. 3Case Story 3: Potato drying equipment, Peruiv In Peru the popular traditional dish carapulcra is prepared with dried potatoes, meat and other ingredients. As the main ingredient for carapulcra the dried potatoes have a good market in both Andean and coastal cities such as Lima, and the product carries higher value than the fresh tuber. In the Andean highlands where most potato is produced, harvesting comes at the end of the rainy season. Women are mainly responsible for peeling and cooking the potatoes and then laying out and sun-drying the cooked pieces in the open air. Post-harvest researchers were interested to improve the productivity of the processing technique in order to increase income. Infl uenced by current research and development interest in drying technology for di erent processed food products and talking to local men, the researchers identifi ed the installation of modern drying equipment to accelerate the drying process as the best option for improving the e  ciency of the overall system. Evaluation of the drying boxes that researchers introduced showed, according to the fi ndings, that “traditional methods dry the food products as quickly as the improved method”, despite its higher cost. The “improved” method was not adopted.  If the researchers had talked to local women, who are the ones responsible for this processing activity, they would have learnt something di erent: the women were quite satisfi ed with sun-drying. What they urgently needed was improved equipment for peeling the potatoes. This latter was deemed very time consuming and interfered with their other commitments. Photo A: Source, http://cipotato.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/005850.pdf, p. 217.  Photo B: PROINPA Foundation – Bolivia.Case Story 4: Potato grading equipment, Jacopampa in BoliviavAn important task in potato production for commercialization is potato grading by size. In order to reduce the time devoted to this task, there was an attempt to introduce equipment for mechanized potato grading (Photo A). The evaluations showed positive results but the equipment was not adopted by farmers. A subsequent analysis found that in the validation meetings more men than women had participated and they had gladly operated the equipment. However, within the families, it was still the women who carried out the grading. Women found the operation of the new technology di  cult due to the height of the equipment and, the strength necessary to operate the cranks and lift the potato bags to feed the equipment. Once these conditions were understood, a di erent equipment was introduced (lower, without cranks, where the potatoes were fed by gravity and were pushed manually through sieves) (Photo B). This equipment reduced the time allocated to manual selection, as its simplicity, low bearing and lower physical strength requirement allowed women to adopt it.This case shows that in addition to general social context factors, characteristics and conditions of key actors interact in favour or against the adoption of technologies, in this case the size of the operator and his/her physical strength. Taking the perspectives and special knowledge of key actors into account in technology design and development increases relevance of the equipment and likelihood of adoption. Women cutting potato for Papa Seca. Photo: Gordon Prain. AB4In the Central Highlands in Vietnam, cassava is grown in remote hills.  Men go to the fi eld and carry cassava using two-wheel tractors, while women ask their husband to give them a ride. Those vehicles are integral parts of rural agriculture and they help men exercise power both physically and symbolically. In the matrilineal Ede community in the Central Highlands, for example, many men perceive that their decision-making power is higher than their wives because they can drive two-wheel tractors while their wives cannot. Tractors thus enable men not only to control some aspects of farming and increase their mobility but they also strengthen men’s symbolic power. Agricultural machines have been mostly made by men and used by men. Until recently, little attention was paid to women’s needs. As a direct result of men’s migration to cities, there is a growing demand for agricultural machines that are usable for women (e.g. small, light and easy maintenance). Machines designed for women could help female farmers not only save labor and time but also increase their confi dence and power. Principal questions and follow-on questionsAre there any machines used for your targeted crops during the whole cycle from plowing to selling?Yes: What are these machines?Who owns them?Who uses them? Who are the non-users and why? Are there men and/or women who earn income as manual laborers in the study/intervention areas and for which tasks? No: Are there needs and/or challenges expressed by men and women? Does your intervention introduce new machines? (e.g. for cultivating, harvesting and processing)Yes:What machine?Who are you targeting as users of the new machines and why? What may be possible barriers for some users and how best to mitigate these barriers? Who are the non-users and why? Are there any risks or unintended consequences you can think of? (e.g. creating envy among the community members; resulting in control of innovation by a small number of powerful members; landless women/men laborers lose their jobs)Are the machines usable for women in terms of the requirement of physical power and skills and knowledge needed for maintenance? Does your intervention create additional labor- and fi nancial-burden for men and/or women farmers?No:Please go to question 3.Does your intervention depend on access to particular machinery?Yes:Who own the machinery (e.g. men, women)? Who can access the machinery and how? How does your intervention support those who don’t have machines? No:Does your intervention create addi-tional labor for men and/or women farmers? Case Story 5: Cassava tractors, the Central Highlands in VietnamviGuiding questionsPhoto: Nguyen Thi Van Anh.The guiding questions below are presented to stimulate researchers to think about the gender implications of actual or possible interventions involving machinery or that may depend on existing machinery. Undertaking a needs assessment is strongly encouraged. This will not only mean that the proposed activities are more relevant to the needs of users (and thus, better take up and adoption), but also shows funders that there is evidence-based research for the proposed intervention.5How will you monitor and evaluate (M&E) visible and hidden impacts of mechanization? Please critically consider how the new technology/intervention is likely to a ect di erent people, for example: a)     Are there changes in gender division of labor in other farming and non-farming activities?b)    Are there di erences in men and women’s perceived benefi ts and positive / negative changes they face?c)    What are impacts of the intervention on di erent socio-economic groups and their roles in the community? In general, big and expensive machinery are developed by men and used by men. Photo: Nguyen Thi Van Anh. Small-scale simple machinery and equipment can signifi cantly help women  save their time and labor. Left: a cassava milling machine in Benin. Photo: D. Dufour. Right: a sweet potato vine cutting machine for animal feeding in Vietnam. Photo: Nguyen Thi Van Anh. Many women’s tasks are still manual across the global South. Left: women peeling cassava in Benin. Photo: D. Dufour. Right: women working with an ox in Vietnam. Photo: Nguyen Thi Van Anh. The portfolio of CGIAR Research Programs has changed since 2017, please see here.Correct citation: Kawarazuka1, N., Prain1, G., Forsythe2, L., Mayanja1, S., Mudege1, N.N., Babini1, C., Polar1,V. (2018). Gender in Agricultural Mechanization: Key guiding questions. Lima, Peru: CIP.1 International Potato Center, 2 Natural Resources Institute, University of GreenwichTo learn more visit: gender.cgiar.org/collaborative-research/gennovate/Contact:Lone BadstueGENNOVATE Project Leader International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) email: l.badstue@cgiar.orgThis publication was made possible by the support of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. AcknowledgementsThis research was undertaken as part of, and funded by, the CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB) and supported by CGIAR Fund Donors. Funding support for this work was provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Valuable comments were provided by Graham Thiele (RTB), Lone Badstue (CIMMYT) and Amare Tegbaru (IITA).  Referencesi GENNOVATE RTB-HT team. (2017). Gender in Agricultural Change: Towards more inclusive innovation in farming communities. GENNOVATE Report to the CGIAR Research Programs on Roots, Tubers and Bananas and Humidtropics. GENNOVATE Research Paper. Lima, Peru: RTB.  ii Forsythe, L., Posthumus, H. & Martin, A. (2016). A crop of one's own? Women's experiences of cassava commercialization in Nigeria and Malawi. Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security, 1 (2):2, 110-128. ISSN 2413-922X. Forsythe, L., Martin, A.M. & Posthumus, H. (2015). Cassava market development:  a path to women's empowerment or business as usual? Food Chain, 5 (1-2), 11-27.iii Mudege, N. N., Mayanja, S., & Naziri, D. (2016). Gender Situational Analysis of the Sweetpotato Value Chain in Central and Eastern Uganda and Strategies for Gender Equity in Postharvest Innovations. Technical report.  CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas.iv Werge, R. (1977). Socio-economic research on post-harvest technology. In CIP (Ed.) Social Science Research and Training. Report of a Planning Conference. Lima, Peru: CIP. v Polar, V., Babini, C., Flores, P., Velasco, C. & Fonseca, C. (2017). Technology is not gender neutral: factors that infl uence the potential adoption of agricultural technology by men and women. CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas. La Paz, Bolivia: CIP. vi Kawarazuka, N. & Newby J. (2017). Social dimensions of cassava value chain. Case study report submitted to ACIAR.  Photo: IITA.

Gender in agricultural mechanization: Key guiding questions

https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/10568/106756/1/Gender_in_Agricultural-Mechanization_Gennovate_Tool.pdf

Gender in agricultural mechanization: Key guiding questions

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

CGSpace