The Jordan measure, the Jordan curve theorem, as well as the other generic
references to Camille Jordan's (1838-1922) achievements highlight that the
latter can hardly be reduced to the "great algebraist" whose masterpiece, the
Trait\'e des substitutions et des equations alg\'ebriques, unfolded the
group-theoretical content of \'Evariste Galois's work. The present paper
appeals to the database of the reviews of the Jahrbuch \"uber die Fortschritte
der Mathematik (1868-1942) for providing an overview of Jordan's works. On the
one hand, we shall especially investigate the collective dimensions in which
Jordan himself inscribed his works (1860-1922). On the other hand, we shall
address the issue of the collectives in which Jordan's works have circulated
(1860-1940). Moreover, the time-period during which Jordan has been publishing
his works, i.e., 1860-1922, provides an opportunity to investigate some
collective organizations of knowledge that pre-existed the development of
object-oriented disciplines such as group theory (Jordan-H\"older theorem),
linear algebra (Jordan's canonical form), topology (Jordan's curve), integral
theory (Jordan's measure), etc. At the time when Jordan was defending his
thesis in 1860, it was common to appeal to transversal organizations of
knowledge, such as what the latter designated as the "theory of order." When
Jordan died in 1922, it was however more and more common to point to
object-oriented disciplines as identifying both a corpus of specialized
knowledge and the institutionalized practices of transmissions of a group of
professional specialists
