Biltereyst, Daniël

Huisman, Martijn

Joye, Stijn

English

Ghent University Academic Bibliography

“YOU CAN JUST GET IT FROM WIKIPEDIA”A QUALITATIVE EXPLORATION OF THE ATTITUDES, PERCEPTIONS, AND USE OF WIKIPEDIA AS A SOURCE OF HEALTH INFORMATION BY MIDDLE-AGED AND OLDER ADULTSMartijn Huisman, Daniël Biltereyst, & Stijn Joye / 06.02.2020 / Etmaal 2020VAKGROEP COMMUNICATIEWETENSCHAPPENONDERZOEKSGROEP HEALTH, MEDIA & SOCIETY (HM&S)2▪ Wikipedia has become a key component of our online information infrastructure. ▪ Popular source of information, including health and medical affairs (Shafee et al., 2017). Average of 170 million page views per month.▪ Surprisingly little is known about Internet users’ attitudes towards and perceptions of the online encyclopaedia as well as how and why they use Wikipedia. A large body of research examines Wikipedia’s factual accuracy and completenessHeilman et al., 2011; Mesgari et al., 2015; Okoli et al., 2014; Shafee et al., 2017. Studies taking a user-centric perspective to Wikipedia are sparse. The overwhelming majority examines the perceptions and use of Wikipedia by studentsBlikstad-Balas, 2016; Colón-Aguirre & Fleming-May, 2012; Head & Eisenberg, 2010; Lim, 2009; Macias, Lee, & Cunningham, 2018; Menchen-Trevino & Hargittai, 2011; Metzger, Flanagin, & Medders, 2010; Rowley & Johnson, 2013; Selwyn & Gorard, 2016; Yaari, Baruchson-Arbib, & Bar-Ilan, 2011. HEALTH AND MEDICAL INFORMATION ON WIKIPEDIALiterature: self-perceived lack of skills, literacy, and confidence as Internet users, difficult to assess the credibility of OHI, anxious about upsetting their relationship with the doctor. Literature: older Internet users might be more hesitant to use Wikipedia than younger generations; more worried about the open character of the encyclopedia and the credibility of its information. THE PRESENT STUDY▪ Investigates the attitudes, perceptions, and use of Wikipedia as a source of health and medical information by middle-aged and older adults (50-80) in the Belgian Flanders region. 3DATA & METHOD4• 40 in-depth qualitative interviews (Ghent)• Young older adults (50-64) & old older adults (65-80). • Heterogeneous group in terms of age, gender, and education. • Diagnosed health conditions as well as healthy individuals.• 18 men / 22 women• Youngest participant 51 y.o., oldest 80 y.o. (groupaverage 64.98).• 31 respondents used the Internet to find health information.POSITIVE PERCEPTIONS, BUT LIMITED KNOWLEDGE▪ Some respondents critical, but the majority expressed positive attitudes towards Wikipedia.▪ However, both critical and uncritical views rooted in limited factual knowledge of how the Wikipedia works. ▪ Respondents knew little about how information on Wikipedia is created, curated, and edited, and few respondents were aware of Wikipedia’s editorial policies, protocols, and other quality control measures. 5SIX KEY QUALITIES AND CHARACTERISTICS6Convenience (easy, quick)CoverageCurrency (up-to-date)ComprehensibilityConciseness (to the point) Familiarity▪ Six key qualities and characteristicswhich make Wikipedia an attractive source of health and medical information. ▪ Reported in previous studies, but for the first time demonstrates that these factors together contribute to the attractiveness of Wikipedia as a source of health and medical information for older generations of Internet users. WIKIPEDIA ULTIMATELY PLAYS A LIMITED ROLERespondents use Wikipedia mostly to only obtain basic facts and general or background health and medical information.Most participants stated that they did not consider Wikipedia as ‘gospel’ or necessarily 100 percent true: they do not blindly trust and use Wikipedia and appeared aware of credibility issues.Respondents would never diagnose or treat themselves based on online health and medical information, including information obtained from Wikipedia. Specific or personal information, serious health issues, clarification of information found on the Internet → visit the doctor. 7BASIC FACTSLIMITED TRUSTDOCTOR #1CONCLUSIONSWhile Wikipedia is a popular source of health and medical information, it appears to play a limited role in the health management and decision-making practices of respondents.8123Given the limited and rudimentary knowledge of Wikipedia’s workings, and the fact that Wikipedia wants to be a “key public health information tool” (Shafee et al., 2017), Wikipedia might attempt to better explain how it operates and how health and medical entries are created and edited. Novel because of its qualitative approach and exploration of an understudied target audience, this study contributes original insights as well as nuances to prior Wikipedia user-centric studies.THANK YOUMARTIJN HUISMANMARTIJN.HUISMAN@UGENT.BE

'You can just get it from Wikipedia' : a qualitative exploration of the attitudes, perceptions, and use of Wikipedia as a source of health information by middle-aged and older adults

https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8650513/file/8650514.pdf

'You can just get it from Wikipedia' : a qualitative exploration of the attitudes, perceptions, and use of Wikipedia as a source of health information by middle-aged and older adults

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Ghent University Academic Bibliography