In the course of understanding a text, a succession of decision points arise at which readers are faced with the task of choosing among alternative possible interpretations ofthattext. We present new experimental evidence that different readers use different inference strategies to guide their inference behavior during understanding. The choices available to an understander range from various alternative inferential paths to the option of making no inference at a particular point, leaving a 'loose end'. Different inference strategies result in observably different behaviors during understanding, including consistent differences in reading times, and different interpretations of a text. The preliminary experimental results given here so far consistently support a previously published set of hypotheses about the inference process that we have called Judgmental Inference theory
