The author shows that the notion of contingency forms one of the key notions of Deleuze’s philosophy. It is, however, never developed as such, but always presented through other key notions and conceptions of Deleuze’s philosophy – (thinking as) dice throw, “the power of the false”, “becoming”, “time out of joint”, “eternal return” and, of course, “event”. Through examination of these notions and conceptions the author shows the power and consequences of Deleuze’s theory of contingency as well as its major flaw – contingency is for Deleuze always thought as the Contingency, as the Event, as the eternal return of the One and that is in contradiction with the major task of philosophy as such for Deleuze: “to create is to resist”.Avtor se osredotoča na naključje kot enega ključnih pojmov Deleuzove filozofije, ki pa pri Deleuzu nikoli ne nastopi kot tak, pač pa je vselej tematiziran skozi druge koncepte. Avtor skozi obravnavo metafore o metu kock, moči popačenja in postajanja, koncepcije “časa, ki je iz tira”, “večnega vračanje” in dogodka pokaže moč in razsežnosti Deleuzovega pojmovanja naključja, hkrati pa tudi njegovo temeljno pomanjkljivost – naključje je namreč za Deleuza vselej Naključje, Met kock, Dogodek, večno vračanje Enega – zaradi katere temeljni motto Deleuzove filozofije, ustvarjati nove koncepte in se s tem upirati danemu, pade v prazno
