We propose a rigorous and effective way to compare experimental and
theoretical histograms, incorporating the different sources of statistical and
systematic uncertainties. This is a useful tool to extract as much information
as possible from the comparison between experimental data with theoretical
simulations, optimizing the chances of identifying New Physics at the LHC. We
illustrate this by showing how a search in the CMSSM parameter space, using
Bayesian techniques, can effectively find the correct values of the CMSSM
parameters by comparing histograms of events with multijets + missing
transverse momentum displayed in the effective-mass variable. The procedure is
in fact very efficient to identify the true supersymmetric model, in the case
supersymmetry is really there and accessible to the LHC
