Reply to comment on "Lost in translation: topological singularities in group field theory"

Abstract

In [1, arXiv:1102.1844] the author disputes the conclusion of our paper [2, arXiv:1006.0714]. He claims that the Feynman graphs of three dimensional group field theory always represent pseudo manifolds. However, [1] uses a different definition for pseudo manifolds. also, in order to apply the new definition, [1] proposes a construction which cannot be implemented in a path integral by Feynman rules. These two points invalidate the claims of [1]