The Burning Index (BI) produced daily by the United States government's
National Fire Danger Rating System is commonly used in forecasting the hazard
of wildfire activity in the United States. However, recent evaluations have
shown the BI to be less effective at predicting wildfires in Los Angeles
County, compared to simple point process models incorporating similar
meteorological information. Here, we explore the forecasting power of a suite
of more complex point process models that use seasonal wildfire trends, daily
and lagged weather variables, and historical spatial burn patterns as
covariates, and that interpolate the records from different weather stations.
Results are compared with models using only the BI. The performance of each
model is compared by Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), as well as by the
power in predicting wildfires in the historical data set and residual analysis.
We find that multiplicative models that directly use weather variables offer
substantial improvement in fit compared to models using only the BI, and, in
particular, models where a distinct spatial bandwidth parameter is estimated
for each weather station appear to offer substantially improved fit.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/10-AOAS401 the Annals of
Applied Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aoas/) by the Institute of
Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org